Home › Lifestyle › Lifestyle
Activist moms campaign to get more local hospitals to allow natural deliveries after Caesarean sections
Birth rights
Photo by Rob Varela
Gwen Cornell kisses her newborn son, Levi, at the family's home in Oak View. She gave birth to Levi naturally at 3:03 a.m. Sept. 7 in a RV on a Highway 101 offramp near Camarillo, en route to Los Robles Regional Medical Center in Thousand Oaks, which allows vaginal births after a Caesarean section.
Photo by Rob Varela
Gwen Cornell laughs about Levi's recent birth, a vaginal delivery after an earlier C-section.
To learn more
What: Birth Action Coalition panel and fair.
When: 10:30 a.m. to 3 p.m. Saturday.
Where: Mission Park in Ventura, at Santa Clara and California streets.
Cost: Free.
Details: A Walk for Women's Rights in Childbirth will begin at 10:30 a.m., to be followed by a panel discussion at 11:30 a.m. with physicians and Ricki Lake, producer of "The Business of Being Born." Live music from Tin Drum, food and entertainment for kids also will be featured.
Information: Visit http://birthactioncoalition.com.
The contractions began just after midnight on Sept. 7. Gwen Cornell got out of bed, wondering if she should wake her husband, Ira. He was exhausted after working all day in his business as an electrical contractor.
She was seized with another contraction. Had it been only 10 minutes?
She let Ira know she was in labor but encouraged him to get a little sleep first. It would be awhile yet before they had to pack their two toddlers in the motor home and drive from their Oak View house to Los Robles Regional Medical Center in Thousand Oaks.
Gwen, 31, planned the 40-mile trip to Los Robles because it is the only hospital in Ventura County that will accommodate a vaginal birth after Caesarean — or VBAC. Her obstetrician, Dr. Thomas Vangeem, is one of only three at Los Robles who will do VBAC deliveries.
"The decision is made by the physician and the patient," said Medical Center spokeswoman Kris Carraway-Bowman.
Many physicians feel there are too many risks involved for women who want a vaginal birth after having given birth via Caesarean section. Caesarean, or C-section, is the process of cutting into the uterus to remove the baby. One of the biggest concerns about a VBAC delivery, according to the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, is that the uterus will tear at the incision site, although VBAC supporters argue that the risks are low.
Mothers like Gwen Cornell find themselves caught between the medical and insurance communities committed to safe, cost-effective practices and their own instincts toward natural childbirth.
It is a complex issue that a local group, the Birth Action Coalition, hopes to demystify a bit during a public event next weekend in Ventura; the one-day panel and fair — featuring a scheduled appearance by Ricki Lake, producer of the new documentary "The Business of Being Born" — is to familiarize the public with its efforts to get more hospitals to allow VBACs, one of many items on its agenda.
"We are helping to empower and educate women and their families to find care providers who are supportive of what they want in childbirth, whether that's a natural birth or planned Caesarean," said BAC coordinator Kimberly Rivers of Piru.
The community activist group wants Ventura County's other six hospitals to consider allowing VBACs.
"A lot of physicians feel it's dangerous," explained Simi Valley Hospital spokeswoman Alicia Gonzalez.
"I think vaginal births after Caesarean should be available to women," said Los Robles gynecologist Ronald De La Pena. "It should require scrutiny by the physician."
Gwen, who is a member of BAC, said she believes the danger of VBACs is overstated. She and the other 150 or so BAC members want hospitals to understand the importance of giving women the option of delivering vaginally, even if they've had a previous C-section.
"I feel it's important because it's what I was made to do as a woman and a mother," Gwen said. "I have faith and confidence that I can do it. Once you've had a vaginal or natural birth, you're very empowered as a woman and a mother afterward."
Addy, Cali and Levi
Gwen's first child, Addy, was born May 14, 2004, at Community Memorial Hospital in Ventura. She was delivered via C-section because the doctor was concerned the baby's heart rate was slowing, Gwen said.
Gwen knew the risks, but she wanted her second child, Cali, to be born vaginally, with help from a licensed midwife. Gwen also wanted hospital support nearby in case there was a problem.
Her doctor saw to her prenatal care, but Gwen planned to start laboring with Cali in the couple's motor home, which they parked in the lot of a church near Los Robles.
Gwen would have help from a doula, which essentially is a nonmedical support person — a midwife — trained and licensed to assist in the birthing process.
Gwen wanted to labor as long as possible before entering the hospital.
"When you're in a hospital, they have more chance to interfere," she said, adding, "It's hard to relax when you've got lights and people walking in and out."
So, as soon as Gwen went into labor on June 2, 2006, the couple drove their RV to the church parking lot. There, Ira and the doula supported Gwen as she labored.
When the doula noted that delivery was near, Gwen was driven over to Los Robles.
"We basically walked in, put me in a gown and, 45 minutes later, I had my daughter," Gwen said.
The VBAC birth was successful, so, when Gwen learned she was pregnant with Levi, she wanted to deliver him the same way. Apparently, Levi had other plans.
A bumpy ride
Ira couldn't sleep in the early hours of Sept. 7. He could hear Gwen in the bathroom, exhaling hard through her contractions. It was time.
He dressed Addy and Cali and buckled them into their car seats in the back of the RV.
He stopped in Casitas Springs, when Gwen asked to go into the back of the RV. He helped her, then returned to the driver's seat and drove south on the 101 as his wife groaned behind him.
"We're passing Victoria (in Ventura) and I said, Do I need to pull over?' No! Just get there!'" Ira recalled.
"We're passing Rice (in Oxnard)," Ira recalled, "and I said, Do I need to pull over?' No! Just get there!'
"Then we get to Central," he said, "and I hear, PULL OVER!'"
He pulled off the road on the Central exit between Oxnard and Camarillo and put on the flashers. He grabbed towels. By the time he got back to his wife, Levi was crowning.
"Ira said, You need to stand up,'" Gwen said. "I did and he watched the baby turn one way, then the other, and then he basically caught my son. We rubbed his back and he started to cry."
The girls were introduced to their brother, then the family turned around and went home.
Gwen took the baby for a checkup with Vangeem three days later.
VBAC pros and cons
For 70 years, the dictum in obstetrical communities was, "Once a Caesarean, always a Caesarean." Caesarean deliveries reached a statistical high between 1970 and 1988, rising from 5 percent of all deliveries to 25 percent.
According to a series of guidelines co-written by ACOG board member Dr. Carolyn Zelop, the spike probably was a result of pressure on doctors to take the safest route possible if there were any pregnancy complications.
If a baby were upside-down, for example — in a breech position — the doctor was discouraged from delivering the baby vaginally.
Then, improvements in perinatal care began to change the dictum. In the late 1980s, the National Institutes of Health and ACOG began embracing the idea of VBACs.
According to an ACOG report, between 1989 and 1996, VBAC deliveries increased from less than 19 percent to more than 28 percent.
"We went through a period where people didn't understand there were any limitations and everybody was eligible for a VBAC," said Zelop, who is director of maternal fetal medicine and associate chairwoman of St. Francis Hospital and Medical Center in Hartford, Conn.
According to the report, some health insurance companies even pressured doctors to offer VBACs to unsuitable candidates, which resulted in well-publicized reports of uterine ruptures and other complications.
As a result, many hospitals stopped offering VBACs. The Caesarean delivery rate in the U.S. rose again, to an all-time high of 26.1 percent of all deliveries in 2002. In contrast, the VBAC rate has decreased by 55 percent to 12.6 percent of all deliveries.
The BAC, founded in Ventura County in February, wants to see that changed.
"We really want to show this is something the community thinks is important," said Rivers, explaining the event scheduled Saturday in Ventura's Mission Park. "There are so many moms in this community who want access to VBACs."
De La Pena said some doctors do want to offer VBACs and other services, but there are hoops to clear. De La Pena served as head of the OB/GYN department at Los Robles for four years, so he's had a lot of experience with hoops.
"It's an ongoing tug-of-war between what hospitals want to do and what doctors want to do in many areas," he said. "I have conversations like that on a regular basis."
"The problem here is that there are doctors practicing who are not going to get coverage from their insurance companies if they choose to do a VBAC," Zelop said.
She added that she believes the pendulum has swung too far the other way and VBACs have gotten a bad rap.
According to ACOG, uterine ruptures occur in 1 to 3.7 percent of cases, but Zelop's report stresses that there are many variables, including the type of C-section the mother had previously.
If a mother is a VBAC candidate, both Zelop and De La Pena agree it should never be attempted at home. "Home delivery is for pizza," De La Pena said. "Births should be in the hospital."
Posted by jennplew on October 12, 2008 at 12:01 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"Home delivery is for Pizza"?? What an outrageuos comment. My birth and my child are not even comparable to a food item! Birth is a sacred journey to be held where a women choses!
The event on Oct. 4 was amazing and inspirational, but where was the press coverage??
Posted by KolmiMajumdar on October 13, 2008 at 2:45 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Thank you to the Star for a great article on VBAC. Yet, myself and many others wonder where the coverage of the event was! Perhaps the Star didn't want to get rained on even though hundreds of parents and little kids were out?! Go to www.birthactioncoalition.com to learn about the event.
Below is a Letter to the Editor in response to the Sept 28th article to add some food for thought:
VBAC bans deny individual patient’s right to informed consent, including the right to refuse major abdominal surgery that may carry unacceptable risks for a woman and her baby.
American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG) states the opinion that emergency cesarean should be ‘immediately available,’ and some banning hospitals, claiming that they cannot provide that level of resource, point to ACOG as the justification for the bans. Yet, shouldn’t all labor and delivery hospitals be able to provide emergency cesareans immediately, irrespective of whether women have had previous cesarean? And why, amongst hospitals with similar staffing resources, have some preserved VBAC and others banned it?
In fact, ACOG guidelines do not advise banning VBAC, but rather that the patient and physician must come to a mutually acceptable decision.
An underlying cause of VBAC bans: Hospital and physician insurance policies are restricting coverage, not based on safety assessment for the individual woman and her baby, but rather on complicated risk management strategies to protect their bottom line. Insurance companies dictating maternity care policy is unethical and unsafe.
Evidence shows that VBAC is at least as safe as repeat cesarean. The most cited risk of VBAC is uterine rupture. Cesarean surgery carries a host of risks to mother and baby. Yet, real risks of VBAC versus repeat cesarean vary for individual women with particular pregnancies, and must be weighed by the woman with advice of her chosen practitioner.
Interestingly, a California study found that 66% of women experiencing uterine rupture after having had a prior cesarean were not in labor. In other words, elective repeat cesarean doesn’t prevent uterine rupture. And, adding uterine scars increases risks of serious placental problems in future pregnancies so significantly that doctors advise women stop having children after 3 cesareans.
For the wellbeing of mothers and babies, it’s critically important to both decrease the primary cesarean rate and support the option of planned VBAC.
Kolmi Majumdar, Parent Coordinator, Birth Action Coalition, www.birthactioncoalition.com
Posted by SamLee on October 17, 2008 at 6:06 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Thank you for the Sept 28th article on birth choices and vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC). However, several comments within suggested a need for more information.
Homebirth is a safe and well-evidenced option for the majority of women and their births. The largest study of home births attended by Certified Professional Midwives, published in the British Medical Journal (BMJ. 2005 Jun 18;330(7505):1416 ), has found that homebirth is safe for low risk women and involves far fewer interventions than similar births in hospitals. Skilled homebirth midwives are less likely to push amniotomy, epidural, pitocin, or prostaglandin inductive agents which lead to the higher cesarean rates found amongst hospital births. The average nationwide cesarean rate is above 30%, and almost 35% in Ventura County. Homebirth is associated with one-fifth the cesarean rate, lower infection rates, shorter NICU stays for babies, and greater satisfaction with birthing experience than planned hospital births. Birth, even VBAC, does not necessitate a physician's presence. A small study in the Journal of Midwifery in 2005 (50:386-391) reported that 93% of planned midwife-attended homebirth VBACs ended successfully in vaginal birth; 87.7% at home. Homebirth midwives carry with them many of the tools available in hospitals and attend watchfully over a single laboring patient. One-on-one care is preferable to being in a hospital, where the physician is usually not present and nurses watch fetal monitoring strips of several patients at once.
In general, suggesting that homebirth and pizza delivery are analogous is diminishing and inaccurate. It does, however, show that many in the medical field are out of touch with why thousands of parents across this country choose homebirth and value the midwifery model of care. Visit http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/... for further information.
Samantha Lee
Article discussions on this site are to support community debates of issues related to our stories and editorials.
Discussions should not stray from the subject of the story or editorial.
We do not allow the following:
- Posts that degrade others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation or disability.
- Disparaging remarks, abusive language or obscene comments.
- Threats, whether obvious or veiled.
We reserve the right to delete threads and/or ban users for these or other reasons we deem necessary.
Opinions are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.










There are 3 comments to this article.
Comments are found beneath the Yahoo! ad below.