Home › Elections › Elections Opinion
Your letters: Propositions
STORY TOOLS
More from Elections Opinion
Right to protect children
As a father, with a daughter, I would solicit your support of Proposition 4. It is named after "Sarah," a 13-year-old girl who died from an infection after a legal abortion. Because her parents did not know about the abortion, they did not realize their daughter's predicament until it was too late.
Sarah's Law will require a doctor to notify at least one adult family member before performing an abortion on an under-18-year-old girl. Aside from the important goals of reducing abortions, this proposition helps protect girls from sexual predators who may force girls into abortions to cover their crimes.
More than 30 other states have similar laws and there is not one single documented case of a girl being harmed by such a law. In fact, these states have seen reductions in pregnancies and sexually transmitted diseases.
Support your daughter, support "Sarah's Law" and Proposition 4. It is you, the parent(s) who lose the right to protect your child when such laws go unchallenged! Support Proposition 4.
— James R. Caballero, D.C., Oxnard
End exploitation of girls
We need Proposition 4, Sarah's Law, to protect minor girls from sexual predators. Real girls in the real world are exploited by older men who then use secret abortions to cover up their crimes. Proposition 4 would require that a parent be notified before the abortion. If the girl is a victim of parental abuse, another adult family member, such as a grandmother, can be notified.
We need family and law enforcement to hold sexual predators accountable. Vote yes on Proposition 4.
— Mary Hattrup, Santa Paula
Truth, justice matter
Re: your Oct. 13 article, "Parental notice for abortion on ballot again":
I read your article and am concerned about the disparity in attention, space and detail given to proponents and opponents of Proposition 4. I support Proposition 4 as a woman, mother and former teenager. This law ensures that parents will know if and when their teenage daughter undergoes surgery.
I agree with this proposition for obvious medical reasons: Caretakers must be apprised of medical changes in those they care for! Abortion is surgery; it comes with risks and side effects, just like any other surgical procedure.
Women need medical care for this surgery, and teenagers are the ones most likely to try to do it alone.
Second, this law addresses the most common situation a teen girl finds herself in: pregnant by an adult man who does not love her, support her and certainly won't tolerate a child, much less care for her after her surgery.
These are the girls (which is what a female is until she is 18 in this country) we want to support.
Finally, it's still statutory rape in this country for a girl to engage in sexual relations with an adult man (one over 18). Parental notification could help on this front as well.
Please look at both sides of the debate, not just officially, but in truth and justice.
— Liza Hennigan, Ph.D., Ventura
Protect victims
Re: your Oct. 13 article, "Parental notice for abortion on ballot again":
Amy Moy, spokeswoman for Planned Parenthood, claims that Proposition 4 would put teens at "risk" of "delayed care and counseling" and this "potentially" endangers a girl's health. This is simply not true.
In all the states that have notification laws, not one instance of a girl being hurt from delayed care has been found. Look at the voters' guide that explains the pros and cons of every proposition. Proposition 4 will rescue many girls from being abused by adult men who can no longer take them for a secret abortion. Planned Parenthood could not find one instance of harm to girls in 34 states from notification laws! Sadly, Planned Parenthood is far more concerned about the potential loss it will have in revenues if girls cannot be taken for secret abortions.
Proposition 4 simply requires that abortion providers notify a family member when a girl under the age of 18 is going to have an abortion. It is common sense that a minor should not go through a major medical procedure such as abortion alone. Thirty-four states have notification laws like Proposition 4, and they have experienced a decline in abortion rates, teen pregnancies and sexually transmitted diseases without a single case of harm or danger to minors. California minor girls will benefit greatly from Proposition 4.
Law enforcement — including Tony Rackauckas, chief prosecutor of Orange County, and Rod Pacheco, chief prosecutor of Riverside County — supports Proposition 4 because it will help protect minor girls from abuse by predators who will no longer have the benefit of secret abortions for their victims.
We need Proposition 4 in California to protect girls from sexual-abuse coverup and from health risks of secret abortions. Don't let Planned Parenthood fool you.
— Mary Rollino, Ventura
Purity begins at home
Voters who are for Proposition 4 believe in the preciousness of human life, not just the lives of preborn babies, but of their parents. Have these young people been reared in home atmospheres that foster self-respect? Do they understand the great need to lead virtuous lives because their parents are caring enough to demand it?
Modesty in dress is a major part of the equation. Daughters, particularly, need to be protected from dressing provocatively, despite peer pressure. If parents are not tenderhearted and God-fearing enough to instill in their own flesh and blood the virtue of modesty from childhood on, then they should re-examine their priorities.
If parents provide the moral upbringing their children deserve, pureness in thoughts, words and deeds will begin in the home.
— Tracey Smith, Oxnard
Posted by ninab on October 21, 2008 at 1 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"Sarah" was really a 15 year old who was married and had a one year old child. She was an emancipated minor. Nothing in Prop 4 would have saved her.
Also...
I dont understand, Proposition 4 does nothing to increase or decrease risks from an abortion. Unless the girl's parent happens to be a doctor himself or herself, then I don't think they are going to be able to lend a hand during the procedure.
Posted by Ventura_Native_1963 on October 21, 2008 at 1:58 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I believe that at the end of my life I will have to answer to God -- not for whom I loved, but for whom I judged. I believe He will ask me what it was that made me think for even a nanosecond that I had more authority than He does. I am sure I will be speechless as I look into His eyes and silently plead forgiveness for having placed myself in such high regard that I displaced God Himself in my conduct.
As I get older, I look at things differently. I'm a Christian -- I believe what the Bible tells me. I also believe that there are things in the Bible that have been misinterpreted and mangled to the point that too often we are taught the opposite of the lessons God intends for us to learn from His Word. It amazes me that human beings are so arrogant as to stand in judgment against what God Himself said is the most important thing of all: love. Human beings have taken God's Word and turned it into an excuse for bigotry, hatred and prejudice.
What's really at the root of the issue with same-sex marriage is a simple quest for the rights & privileges afforded two people who have decided to make a serious & lifelong (hopefully) commitment to one another. There was a time when these rights & privileges were denied to interracial couples, too. Eventually, it became evident just how ridiculous this unjustified prejudice was -- one day soon I hope that same-sex couples will be afforded the same reversal of judgment. All couples who stand by each other as partners in life, regardless of the racial makeup or sexual orientation of that partnership, should be entitled to the same legal recognition.
"But it's not natural!" you say, referring, of course, to same-sex sex. Anyone who has ever experienced a healthy romantic relationship knows that while sexual intimacy is a wonderful, bonding experience, at its best what goes on in the bedroom with any couple is but a single ingredient in the recipe for a healthy, committed relationship. Jesus said, "And now these three remain: faith, hope and love. But the greatest of these is love" (1 Corinthians 13:13). Christ Himself didn't hang out with the people society had deemed acceptable. He hung out with the bane of society, at least according to the "righteous." Why? Because He walked the walk. He said, "the greatest of these is love" -- and He meant it. Jesus LOVED without worrying about what anyone else might think about it. His love was real, and He didn't need anyone else to confirm it. Real love knows no race or gender -- love, in its truest form, is an inexplicable and intimate connection from the inside-out. Jesus knew this, so why is it so hard for some human beings to just let it be so?
Posted by horsespinner on October 21, 2008 at 4:01 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Notification is good, murder in hiding is bad, even when legal
Posted by reasonable2008 on October 21, 2008 at 9:04 p.m. (Suggest removal)
People keep using extreme stories to justify their position. The bottom-line for me is that a child (younger than 18) is too easily swayed or influenced by people. In general (not always)the parents care more about their child then anyone else and would be best at guiding their child. They are already obligated by law to raise their child until 18 and are responsible for them. It only makes sense for them to be involved in one of the most important decisions in their child's life.
Article discussions on this site are to support community debates of issues related to our stories and editorials.
Discussions should not stray from the subject of the story or editorial.
We do not allow the following:
- Posts that degrade others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation or disability.
- Disparaging remarks, abusive language or obscene comments.
- Threats, whether obvious or veiled.
We reserve the right to delete threads and/or ban users for these or other reasons we deem necessary.
Opinions are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.










There are 4 comments to this article.
Comments are found beneath the Yahoo! ad below.