Weather | Beachcam
Login | Contact Us | Staff | Site Map | Archives | Alerts | Electronic Edition | Subscribe to the paper

HomeElectionsLocal election news

Jackson says she's been a fighter since youth

Running for 19th district senate seat


Download Podcast  Download this story as a podcast!
Eric Parsons / Star staff 
Hannah-Beth Jackson entered politics relatively late in life. She was 48 when elected to the Assembly, shifting careers after practicing law for more than two decades, mostly as a family law attorney in a small firm owned by her and her husband, George Eskin.

Eric Parsons / Star staff Hannah-Beth Jackson entered politics relatively late in life. She was 48 when elected to the Assembly, shifting careers after practicing law for more than two decades, mostly as a family law attorney in a small firm owned by her and her husband, George Eskin.

Order Photos
Eric Parsons / Star staff. Ventura 9/16/08. Hannah-Beth Jackson is running for the 19th District Senate seat for Ventura, Santa Barbara and Los Angeles Counties.

Eric Parsons / Star staff. Ventura 9/16/08. Hannah-Beth Jackson is running for the 19th District Senate seat for Ventura, Santa Barbara and Los Angeles Counties.

Order Photos

Those who know Hannah-Beth Jackson use a common set of adjectives to describe her personality: passionate, tenacious, aggressive, a fighter.

All are traits that she marshaled on July 31, 2006, the day she was diagnosed with breast cancer.

"I researched it, went to the experts, got as many different opinions as I could," she said. "Like I do with everything, I got very proactive."

The best advice was to treat it as aggressively as possible. Jackson underwent surgery, chemotherapy and radiation. She put herself on a strict diet. Even during the worst of the chemotherapy — she lost her hair and says the ordeal was "like having a bad case of the flu for four months" — she kept up an exercise regimen.

"I walked three miles every other day when I could," she recalled. "I considered it my primary job to heal and get well."

Seven months later, in February 2007, she underwent her final treatment.

"The doctor said to just go home and stay well," she said recently. "I feel great. I have lots of energy and a more humble perspective on what life's all about."

By the end of 2007, confident in her prognosis, Jackson announced she would be a Democratic candidate for the state Senate, hoping to return to the Legislature, where she had served in the Assembly from 1998 to 2004.

"I realized that, like all of us, I have a limited amount of time left, so I asked myself, What is it I want to be doing?' This really is my passion," she said. "Just the fact that you're able to be engaged in the process of making public policy is rewarding."

Willingness to irritate'

Jackson, 58, entered politics relatively late in life. She was 48 when elected to the Assembly, shifting careers after practicing law for more than two decades, mostly as a family law attorney in a small firm owned by her and her husband, George Eskin, in downtown Ventura.

Retired Superior Court Judge Melinda Johnson, who has known Jackson since she and Eskin were married in 1981, said Jackson was always a fighter for her clients in court but that she seemed to be more fulfilled as a legislator.

"Her heart is twice as big as that tiny, little body," Johnson said. "She's very passionate at caring about working hard for people."

Jackson's tenacity in fighting for issues didn't win her any congeniality awards in Sacramento. Many legislators, lobbyists and Capitol insiders privately say that her battling style created some hard feelings, and, in fact, may have been the reason that the 2001 redistricting plan did not include a state Senate seat tailored for Jackson.

Former Assemblyman John Longville of San Bernardino, who calls Jackson "one of the brightest, most passionate public-policy advocates I've ever met," cites an example of Jackson's unwillingness to go along to get along.

Longville, an eclectic fellow, sometimes verbally presented his bills to the Assembly in haiku form.

"It got a lot of attention, and members appreciated the brevity," he said. "Everybody appreciates it when you give your message in 17 syllables Hannah-Beth was the only person who had a problem with it."

Jackson argued, he said, that anyone listening on television had the right to hear a brief, cogent summary of what a bill was about.

"It reflects her willingness to irritate a colleague," Longville said, "but her purpose was to provide greater information to the public."

I hated to lose'

Democratic political consultant Gale Kaufman acknowledges the perception that Jackson was not universally liked in Sacramento. She said that could affect the degree to which special interest groups and Democratic leaders are willing to financially support her campaign. "It will be an ingredient, but not THE ingredient," she said.

Richard Holober, executive director of the Consumer Federation of California, said sometimes it takes a fighting spirit to take on interest groups and their legislative allies in the Capitol.

He points to a landmark financial privacy bill that Jackson helped pass, a law that he says provides Californians with the highest level of financial privacy in the nation.

"What California consumers need are advocates who will speak out," he said. "That often means you go up against very wealthy adversaries who fund both political parties. I don't think congeniality is always the recipe."

Jackson says she's been a fighter since she was a young girl. "I was not allowed to play Little League," she said, "even though I was the best guy on the team."

She took up tennis instead. She won the national 16-and-younger doubles championship and went on to play four years as the No. 1 singles player for Scripps College.

"I love competition," she said. "What motivated me when I was young was that I hated to lose."

It was her passion'

Jackson grew up in the Boston suburb of Newton, the daughter of a photography supply owner and the granddaughter of a Russian immigrant.

After coming to California to get her bachelor's degree at Scripps, she returned to Boston University to pursue her law degree.

Upon graduation, she headed back to California. "I went back East and realized I was right the first time," she said.

She landed a job with the Santa Barbara County District Attorney's Office, where she first met Eskin, now a Superior Court judge in Santa Barbara. After two years as a prosecutor, she went into private law practice in Los Angeles.

There, she became involved in advocating for changes in child custody laws and met a UCLA law professor who shared an interest in the subject, Sheila Kuehl, who would later establish the California Women's Law Center and go on to serve 14 years in the Legislature.

Kuehl said she took a liking to Jackson right away, kept in touch, and eventually encouraged Jackson to run for the Assembly.

What was it about Jackson that made an impression?

"It was her passion," Kuehl said. "She was always so passionate."

Discussions

Posted by MakingWaves on October 5, 2008 at 11:20 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Good article, Timm! I would agree wholeheartedly that Hannah-Beth is a fighter who sticks up for what is right. If she irritates those in her own party sometimes for it, more power to her.

This would also explain why big corporations she has taken on are pumping enormous sums of money into Tony Strickland's campaign.
http://www.electiontrack.com/lookup.p...

Look at these tobacco contributions to Strickland and this doesn't even count the most recent maxed out $3,600 contributions from Philip Morris and UST:
http://www.center4tobaccopolicy.org/R...|5686&menu=id|5014&LID=208

Posted by NowHearThis on October 5, 2008 at 4:16 p.m. (Suggest removal)

The opening paragraph in the Hannah-Beth Jackson story today:
"Those who know Hannah-Beth Jackson use a common set of adjectives to describe her personality: passionate, tenacious, aggressive, a fighter."

Versus:

The lead paragraph in the Tony Strickland story:
"As a boy growing up in Simi Valley, Tony Strickland was good at basketball, but not great."

You see folks, we know where the STAR stands in the upcoming state senate race. Jackson is, "passionate, tenacious and aggressive, a fighter."

Whereas, Strickland is a basketball player, but not a great one.

Strickland: “Because of his zeal for politics, however, Strickland has made some enemies.”
Jackson: All Fluff and of course, the DEM candidate has no enemies.

You have to compare both stories together.

If anyone doesn't get the double standard and bias in reporting, maybe they need to bang their head into a brick wall first.

Posted by nacilep on October 5, 2008 at 4:41 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Hey "now hear this": perhaps you should read the article on Jackson more carefully: "It reflects her willingness to irritate a colleague," Longville said, "but her purpose was to provide greater information to the public." "Willingness to irritate" "Jackson's tenacity in fighting for issues didn't win her any congeniality awards in Sacramento." Strickland himself made reference to his less-than-stellar performance in basketball. Your comments mirror the tactics used by Strickland (born-again alternative energy executive), i.e., misleading and conveniently ignoring facts.

Posted by gopisevil on October 6, 2008 at 5:24 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Hanna-Beth is a wonderful friend to Ventura County. She is not only intelligent but truly kind and compasionate, championing not only human issues of the downtrodden like mental illness, homelessness, elder abuse and healthcare, and helping the working poor, but also animal/pet cruelty causes like Proposition 2.

Her opponent, Tony Strickland is the embodiment of greed, instant gratuity and intolerance. He is not an "alternative energy" executive as he claims, but a fraud working for a disreputable firm that develops so-called fuel additive products that don't work. He is a weenie.



Discuss this article
(Requires free registration.)

Article discussions on this site are to support community debates of issues related to our stories and editorials.

Discussions should not stray from the subject of the story or editorial.

We do not allow the following:

  • Posts that degrade others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation or disability.
  • Disparaging remarks, abusive language or obscene comments.
  • Threats, whether obvious or veiled.

We reserve the right to delete threads and/or ban users for these or other reasons we deem necessary.

Opinions are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Username:

Password:
(Forgotten your password?)

Your Turn:

Loading videos... If you don't see them shortly, you may need to download the Flash Player.