Weather | Beachcam
Login | Contact Us | Staff | Site Map | Archives | Alerts | Electronic Edition | Subscribe to the paper

HomeNewsFillmore

Changes on flood maps would aid residents

Owners of some parcels would not need insurance

The Federal Emergency Management Agency agreed Thursday to a change that could keep the owners of thousands of parcels of land in Oxnard and Fillmore from having to buy flood insurance, officials said.

By considering the Santa Clara River and Sespe Creek levees in segments instead of in their entirety, FEMA could grant preliminary accreditation letters to parts of the levees. That might change the number of parcels considered to be in Flood Plain A, a designation that would require property owners with a federally backed loan to buy insurance and could result in some building restrictions.

"Hopefully, they'll never have to buy flood insurance," said Jeff Pratt, director of the Ventura County Watershed Protection District, which owns and maintains the levees. "There will still be areas of Fillmore and Oxnard in the flood plain, but we will be working to remove those as well."

In Fillmore, for example, estimates place the monthly cost of flood insurance at about $100.

New maps expected in 2009

Because of concerns with certain parts of the levees, FEMA had drawn its preliminary flood insurance rate maps as if the levees were not there.

The maps could be published next year, with the requirements going into effect at that time.

During a conference call Thursday afternoon among FEMA engineers led by Kathleen Schaefer, and involving Pratt, Ventura County Supervisor Kathy Long and Rep. Elton Gallegly's District Chief of Staff Brian Miller, Schaefer said the Watershed Protection District could write a letter segmenting the levees and pursuing accreditation for the segments, Pratt said.

Schaefer could not be reached for comment late Thursday. Gallegly spokesman Tom Pfeifer confirmed that the meeting took place but declined to comment on it because he was not present.

Pratt said he believes the Santa Clara River levee will be accredited from Highway 101 to Saticoy and the Sespe Creek levee will be accredited north of Telegraph Road.

"We know these portions of the levees are good," Pratt said. "It's a foregone conclusion."

Fillmore Public Works Director Bert Rapp was encouraged by the decision.

More good news'

Two weeks earlier, FEMA had agreed to allow the continued use of a manual beam system to close a railroad cut-through in the Sespe Creek levee. Before that, FEMA had wanted the beam system to be replaced by an automatic gate.

"This is more good news," Rapp said of Thursday's development. "We're anxious to see how it actually pans out."

Rapp said an analysis will determine exactly how many parcels could be taken out of the flood plain in Fillmore as a result of segments of the levee being accredited. Pratt said he believed the change would affect several thousand parcels in Fillmore and about 1,000 in Oxnard.

Potential issues remain in the southern part of the Sespe Creek levee, which was built in the 1970s, and in part of the Santa Clara River levee, which was rebuilt in 1969 following flooding. "There's still a large part of Oxnard that we need to work on," Pratt said. "That may involve raising some levees or some levee retrofit."

Discussions

There are 5 comments to this article.   

Comments are found beneath the Yahoo! ad below.

Comments

Posted by frank14 on October 3, 2008 at 6:50 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Maybe they can turn their atention to why Ventura Road floods every time we have a quarter inch of rain?

Posted by DaleJ on October 3, 2008 at 8:29 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Gee I am Really Relieved to see that problem with the levees is solved. I can remember back in 1969 as a resident of Oxnard (which I am still) the flooding that occurred. The levees did there job then, just one small problem was encountered. The water level was higher then the levees. There was mud washed up in Wagon Wheel as high as the train bridge. And if i am not mistaken wasn't the bridge on L.A. ave crossing over Santa Clara river going into Saticoy damaged heavily. Also at that time the river bed was used as a recreation area for off roading so there was a considerable less amount of vegetation clogging it then there is currently. So I just hope that the powers to be are correct in there calculations, and its just not some backroom deal that Oxnard is famous for so that the River Park development will be a easier sell to future residents and business owners. Thank You For Time

Posted by beachgurl on October 3, 2008 at 9:47 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Why would you buy a house in a "flood zone" and not have flood insurance? If you can't afford $1200 a year for the insurance than how are you going to be able to afford to replace all your possessions when they are swept away or ruined by water when the flood comes?
To all you folks in RiverPark (ha ha) and The Bridges...see you downstream!

Posted by Ventura22 on October 3, 2008 at 5:38 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Riiiight... I'm sure the flood waters will always recognize those insurance boundaries too. Sometimes, even the government can't protect stupid people from themselves.

Posted by ModerateCaNative on October 3, 2008 at 10:21 p.m. (Suggest removal)

I have lived in this area since 1974, and everytime there was a halfway decent rain you always heard about flooding in Nyeland Acres/El Rio area. So when I saw the planned development for Riverpark, my first thought was, "Who would buy a house in a flood plain"? I am sure there are areas in this country designated flood plains that have a problem, maybe every 100 years, but the area around the new development is notorious. I don't care if the insurance was cheap, it just wouldn't be worth it to me.





Article discussions on this site are to support community debates of issues related to our stories and editorials.

Discussions should not stray from the subject of the story or editorial.

We do not allow the following:

  • Posts that degrade others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation or disability.
  • Disparaging remarks, abusive language or obscene comments.
  • Threats, whether obvious or veiled.

We reserve the right to delete threads and/or ban users for these or other reasons we deem necessary.

Opinions are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Discuss this article
(Requires free registration.)

Username:

Password:
(Forgotten your password?)

Your Turn:

Please download the latest version of Adobe Flash Player, or enable JavaScript for your browser to view the video player.