Home › Opinion › Opinion
Bush joins disreputable campaign against Obama
President Bush's slander of Barack Obama as a terrorism appeaser would have been bad enough in any circumstance or venue. His carefully selected context — a visit to Israel on its 60th anniversary and an address to the Knesset — gave a particularly acrid odor to the affair.
For the president's target audience was neither Israelis nor their legislators. It was American voters and very particularly Jewish-Americans. To that end, the president hijacked Israel's national day and kidnapped the Knesset's members as props for his own partisan politicking.
And to boot, the White House lied about the event.
At the time, aides were telling any reporter who asked that the unspoken subject of Bush's comment was Obama. Later, they denied that and then decided the target had been former president Jimmy Carter, who had met with leaders of the terrorist Hamas — four weeks earlier.
The peg for the president's comments was Obama's oft-stated willingness to meet with the leaders of antagonist nations without preconditions to explore whether there might be mutual interests that could fruitfully be pursued.
Bush's stance has been to meet or negotiate with no leader who hasn't agreed with him in advance. Stubbornly following his own advice, Bush has thus left himself with only war or futile griping as responses to Iran's dangerous and growing influence in the Mideast.
To serve his habitual fear-mongering, Bush equated Obama's position with a supposed willingness on his part to truckle to terrorists, although the Democrat has specifically rejected the idea of any dealings with Hamas and Hezbollah.
Particularly noxious was the president's invocation of the appeasement of Adolf Hitler before World War II as somehow relevant.
That appeasement had nothing to do with mere talking. Britain and France ceded a large chunk of Czechoslovakia to Germany in 1938, hoping to slake Hitler's lust for territory but, in fact, only whetting it.
Nothing remotely like that is on the table now, any table or anywhere near one.
By raising the Hitler apparition and doing so in Israel and within days of Yom HaShoah, the annual lamentation for the Holocaust, Bush made himself party to the thoroughly disreputable campaign that is under way to cast Obama, contrary to his voting record and years of his commentary, as a secret enemy of Israel.
That campaign is viral on the internet, and at its extremes — and there is very little to the campaign but extremes — has Obama as a secret Muslim, a sleeper jihadist, even a cat's paw abroad for the political leanings of distant cousins in Kenya.
The issue of when to talk and to which leaders and under what circumstances is legitimate, though it is being argued only shallowly by Obama and John McCain alike. In any event, whichever becomes president, it is likely to be settled by events later rather than by campaign poses now.
George W. Bush first ran for the presidency promising dignity in the White House. Going overseas to play underhanded partisan politics at home doesn't seem to fit.
— Tom Teepen writes for Cox Newspapers. His e-mail address is teepencolumn@earthlink.net.




Posted by mikeb6804 on May 21, 2008 at 12:22 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Tom--you're a drip. It wouldn't have bothered you a bit if Willy had done the same thing. Bush never called Obama or Democrats by name; tells me there is a lot of thin skin around. Like the old saying goes, "If the shoe fits, wear it!"
Your columns are never worth reading.
Posted by jw1000 on May 21, 2008 at 4:59 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Obamas popularity with voters has actually gone up in the last few days according to polling data. Probably because the nations worst President in history made the mistake of criticizing him without using his name. Of course there are still idiotic nutjobs who support Bush at every turn.
Posted by Tom_Johnston on May 21, 2008 at 5:24 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Even as Bush's own Party begins to distance itself from him, he still doesn't get it.
He has met the problem and the problem is himself.
One hopes he'll live long enough to hear the beginnings of History's judgement of his turn at the Presidency, I'm sure it will be considered one of the worst in our nations history.
Posted by jw1000 on May 21, 2008 at 6:13 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Gottabwhite: I was referring to respected public opinion polls. Those polls ALL show Obama has benefited from the idiotic worst President in history criticism. Not polls of idiots at a skinhead or KKK bar.
Posted by mikeb6804 on May 21, 2008 at 7:55 a.m.
(This thread was removed by the site staff.)
Posted by shaver_one on May 21, 2008 at 8:41 a.m. (Suggest removal)
In 2006, John McCain said that talking to Hamas would be a good idea.
Last Week Sec of Defense, Robert Gates said the US needs to talk to Iran.
Is that appeasement, as well, Mr Bush?
shaverone.blog.com
Posted by del on May 21, 2008 at 10:02 a.m. (Suggest removal)
We should take a lesson from Moshe Dayan when he said, "If you want to make peace, you don't talk to your friends. You talk to your enemies."
He had enemies on every border, yet he would book no nonsense from them either.
Posted by lmcventura on May 21, 2008 at 10:07 a.m. (Suggest removal)
At this point in the game, who cares what the Grand Lier says, he's lied all thru his "Presidency" and frankly, I just wish he would leave office!!!
End The War Now!!
(Requires free registration.)
Article discussions on this site are to support community debates of issues related to our stories and editorials.
Discussions should not stray from the subject of the story or editorial.
We do not allow the following:
We reserve the right to delete threads and/or ban users for these or other reasons we deem necessary.
Opinions are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.