Weather | Beachcam
Login | Contact Us | Staff | Site Map | Archives | Alerts | Electronic Edition | Subscribe to the paper

HomeNewsLocal News

Firefighter settles suit with Ventura

Battalion chief forced to go on disability can return to work, receive back pay


Download Podcast  Download this story as a podcast!

Ventura city officials have agreed to pay $750,000 and thousands more in back pay and benefits to settle a lawsuit filed by a former Fire Department official.

Donald Bartosh will be reinstated and is scheduled to return to duty July 1 at the rank of battalion chief, according to a settlement approved by the City Council in closed session Monday night and released Tuesday.

The agreement caps a two-year battle between Bartosh and the city after the veteran firefighter was let go and forced to go on disability because of heart disease.

Under the deal, Bartosh, 53, will receive $750,000 for damages and legal fees. He also is due back pay and benefits, accrued vacation and sick time retroactive to Feb. 12, 2006. The city, however, can offset its payment by the amount of disability pay Bartosh has received so far, about $175,000, City Attorney Ariel Calonne said. Exact figures were not included in the settlement.

Bartosh will return in an administrative role, and because of his heart condition, the city has agreed to some flexibility in his workload, officials said. Bartosh has insisted he plans to work, although technically under the settlement he can choose the "level of physical presence" he is comfortable with, and can telecommute if he prefers.

After a six-month trial period, Bartosh can retire, and he and the city could split the cost of purchasing extra service years to reach the 30-year pension level, the settlement shows. In return, Bartosh agreed to drop his lawsuit.

Bartosh has an unlisted number and could not be reached for comment Tuesday. His brother, local attorney Robert Bartosh, represented him and said the city is "doing the right thing" by letting him return to work.

Ventura Fire Chief Mike Lavery described Bartosh as a dedicated, 27-year employee. When Lavery was hired as chief in 2004, he immediately promoted Bartosh, a fire captain at the time, to acting battalion chief as part of a department reorganization.

"I was disappointed to see him go then, and I am absolutely pleased to see him back," Lavery said Tuesday. "We are elated he can come back to work as part of the settlement."

Calonne said workers' compensation laws often conflict with disability discrimination statutes, which the state Legislature has fortified in recent years. Bartosh could have received $2 million had the case reached a jury, he said.

"The bottom line is that he loved his job and wanted to keep working," said Calonne, who was hired last year and vowed to closely monitor future disability claims. "He wanted his job back. I respect that. That's why we agreed to settle this case."

Discussions

Posted by aaertc on May 14, 2008 at 5:40 a.m. (Suggest removal)

It amazes me, that Mr. Bartosh will get $750,000 from the city of ventura because he was forced to go on disability. My family has a lawsuit against the city of ventura also, because they are in part to blame for my dad's death and do you know what they offered my family $5,000!!! my dad doesn't have the luxury of being reinstated to go back to work, he's dead!!!

Posted by shaver_one on May 14, 2008 at 11:15 a.m. (Suggest removal)

People of Ventura:
Remember this article.
THIS is where your $1.49 per line per month 9-1-1 tax is going.

Posted by marketrealist on May 14, 2008 at 3:13 p.m. (Suggest removal)

The system is so screwed up that one man gets %750K, backpay and his job back. How many others will be laid off to make up for this loss. When will we reform our legal system!

Posted by smithjc on May 14, 2008 at 5:12 p.m. (Suggest removal)

he shouldn't have been laid off in the first place. if he is capable of working, even in an inside administrative position, he should be allowed to continue on.

Posted by 12345 on May 15, 2008 at 8:58 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Think about it. The reason there is a settlement is because the City did not want it to go to trial. They knew they would LOSE. If HR and Risk Management had done things right and with integrity, this would never have been an issue. But, as usual, they thought they were in full control of another City employee's life and future. Don't blame the man for the 750K+. Blame the morons that tried to wrongfully get rid of him and now YOU are going to pay for THEIR ineptitude!



Discuss this article
(Requires free registration.)

Article discussions on this site are to support community debates of issues related to our stories and editorials.

Discussions should not stray from the subject of the story or editorial.

We do not allow the following:

  • Posts that degrade others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation or disability.
  • Disparaging remarks, abusive language or obscene comments.
  • Threats, whether obvious or veiled.

We reserve the right to delete threads and/or ban users for these or other reasons we deem necessary.

Opinions are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Username:

Password:
(Forgotten your password?)

Your Turn:

Loading videos... If you don't see them shortly, you may need to download the Flash Player.