Login | Contact Us | Staff | Site Map | Archives | Alerts | Electronic Edition | Subscribe to the paper

HomeNewsConejo Valley

Amgen investors want change

They ask board to alter the way bylaws are amended; executive pay questioned

Video: PETA protest

 
PETA protesters cage themselves at the site of Amgen's annual shareholder meeting.
Watch now »
Photos by Joseph A. Garcia / Star staff
Charlotte Duncan of Oxnard joins a protest by the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. The protest was staged outside the Four Seasons Hotel in Westlake Village, where Amgen held its annual shareholders meeting Wednesday.

Photos by Joseph A. Garcia / Star staff Charlotte Duncan of Oxnard joins a protest by the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. The protest was staged outside the Four Seasons Hotel in Westlake Village, where Amgen held its annual shareholders meeting Wednesday.

Order Photos

Amgen Inc. shareholders defied the company's board by calling for a change in how some important issues are passed, such as amending company bylaws, at an annual meeting Wednesday.

About 380 investors turned out at the Four Seasons Hotel in Westlake Village — some to hear how the company planned to move forward after a particularly difficult year and others to question why company leaders continue to be highly compensated even as shareholders suffered.

The shareholders' nonbinding resolution would allow a simple majority to pass certain key issues. While the Thousand Oaks-based biotech giant asserts it uses simple majority votes for most decisions, a two-thirds vote is required to approve some business combinations and stockholder amendments to the company bylaws.

Amgen's board of directors advised against an across-the-board simple majority vote, but more than 78 percent of shareholder votes supported the change.

Chief Executive Kevin Sharer said the board would consider the resolution at its next meeting, offering investors assurance that the board "will do the right thing."

Shareholders did re-elect all 11 members of the board.

Sharer acknowledged 2007 was an awful year for the company.

He said the company had to adapt quickly once anemia-fighting drugs, which make up a large part of Amgen's revenue, were called into question for safety reasons. Amgen had been poised for growth when it was instead hit by revenue losses that demanded restructuring and layoffs, Sharer said.

"We were planning for a future that didn't happen," he said.

Chief executive optimistic

This year, the company will have to be able to handle whatever happens with anemia medicines while continuing to work on its promising new drugs, such as one now in testing for treating bone loss.

Given the potential drugs in its pipeline, Amgen could once again achieve industry-leading performance in the next five years, Sharer said.

One shareholder criticized Sharer for raking in millions in compensation last year, including perks such as use of the corporate jet, even though the company's stock had dropped in value by about 35 percent. The Associated Press estimated Sharer's compensation was about $13.2 million for 2007.

Amgen stock, which closed at $42.20 Wednesday, was trading at $63.76 a year ago.

"We're owed a fiduciary and oversight duty to protect us," the shareholder said.

Other speakers questioned why the company doesn't offer a dividend.

Sharer noted his compensation was down from the year before. He also defended the company's leadership, saying the safety issue wasn't something the company caused or could have been expected to prevent.

Amgen should be judged instead on how it handled the situation, he said.

Some local shareholders took advantage of Amgen having its meeting close to home.

Bill Corkins and his wife, Diane Federle, of Ventura have been invested in Amgen for about 15 years. Wednesday marked the first time they attended a shareholder meeting.

Corkins said he saw it as a chance to hear directly from company leaders, lending more insight than what he would read in the annual report.

"It's more important to hear management's thinking and planning in these years than in years where everything is wonderful," he said.

Questions about the future

Mary and Cyril Bauer of Ventura know what a tough year it has been. The Ventura residents have held Amgen stock for about 20 years. Their son-in-law lost his job at the company as part of a major restructuring after he'd worked there more than 16 years. Thousands of positions were slashed at Amgen operations worldwide.

Mary Bauer said she wanted to hear about future plans.

"I think it's a good company," she said. "It certainly adds to the economy of Ventura County."

Another shareholder proposal Wednesday asked the company to report on animal welfare violations.

The proposal was presented by a member of the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals during the meeting. As shareholders drove up to the hotel, they were greeted by the sight of four PETA volunteers in dog kennels on the corner of the public road. A sign above them read: "Amgen Tortures Animals in Labs."

"We would rather be sitting on the other side of a boardroom table than have our volunteers cramming themselves in cages to make a point," Kristie Phelps of PETA said while holding a sign at the protest.

Less than 5 percent of the votes cast were in favor of the resolution.

On the Net:

http://www.amgen.com

Comments

Posted by Brucevacumesrooster on May 8, 2008 at 10:07 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Is it me or does it seem like these morons in the cage look natural in it? I went to the shareholders meeting since it was cold I made sure my wife wore her baby seal fur coat

Posted by rcamacho on May 8, 2008 at 4:22 p.m. (Suggest removal)

I love animals too!
..They TASTE Good!

Posted by rcamacho on May 8, 2008 at 4:27 p.m. (Suggest removal)

,,,awwwwwwh...small people with small minds. You are right Bruce, they do look natural in those cages. I wonder if these same people are willing to go to Planned Parent Hood and other clinics with me and protest the slaughter of innocent childrenn, as much is they do for the animals?

Posted by chardunk on May 8, 2008 at 8:51 p.m. (Suggest removal)

What if some huge, physically overpowering people held you captive and did painful things to you each day? What if they made fun of you when you screamed out of fear, cursed you for no reason, and threw you—literally threw you—back into a cage when they were finished roughing you up? Wouldn't you freeze in terror every time the door opened? Heart racing, you might wish to be invisible to your captors, but you never would be. The anxiety alone would be almost unbearable. It sounds like a nightmare, doesn't it? It is, and it's what monkeys endure in Amgen's laboratories every day.

Posted by jill on May 8, 2008 at 9:37 p.m. (Suggest removal)

It's time for companies like Amgen to evolve and show a little compassion for animals, who feel fear and pain just as we do. It's absolutely horrific what happens in animal testing and, in most cases, unnecessary. I am so grateful for PETA for speaking for those who cannot speak for themselves.

"Think occasionally of the suffering of which you spare yourself the sight."-Albert Schweitzer

Posted by LivinInPoorMansPV on May 9, 2008 at 1:01 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Yah and when an animal bites a person, they put the animal down....but when a "human" that acts like an animal (the freak that killed Sevn) he gets to live. Put him down like they do animals that hurt children!

Posted by Brucevacumesrooster on May 12, 2008 at 10:19 a.m. (Suggest removal)

You know when I went on Safari last summer..I just kept thinking how great this world is because of animals. If there were no animals I would have nothing to shoot. Chardunk, you know people pay good money to have people do to them what you described...so it may not be totally bad for these animals. I am glad we have animal testing, because we know so much more about drug interaction.

Post your comment
(Requires free registration.)

Comments on this site are to be used for the discussion and/or debate of issues related to our stories and editorials.

Comments should not stray from the subject of the story or editorial.

We don't allow the following:

  • Comments that degrade others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation or disability.
  • Disparaging remarks, abusive language or obscene comments.
  • Threats, whether obvious or veiled.

We reserve the right to delete comments and/or ban users for these or other reasons we deem necessary.

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Username:

Password:
(Forgotten your password?)

Your Turn:

Click here to see additional features for Conejo Valley.

Download Podcast  Download this story as a podcast!