Login | Contact Us | Staff | Site Map | Archives | Alerts | Electronic Edition | Subscribe to the paper

HomeBreaking News

Board makes little progess in search for new superintendent

The Ventura County Board of Education met for two hours Tuesday night discussing how to replace Superintendent Charles Weis, but made little progress.

Weis will leave in June for a job as Santa Clara County schools superintendent, and the Ventura County board likely will appoint someone to serve out his term, which ends in 2010.

Trustees called a special meeting for Tuesday to consider hiring a search firm to help with the appointment and three firms submitted proposals. The board, however, decided to review more options before making a decision.

Trustee Marty Bates said he was disappointed that none of the firms had much experience searching for a county superintendent to fill an elected office. He also was one of several trustees put off by a California School Boards Association proposal for "a completely open and transparent" search process.

CSBA executive search services had previously outlined its "typical" search process for a superintendent, which included a confidential selection process.

Since then, however, the CSBA said questions had been raised regarding confidentiality and the organization had changed its proposal.

In the new outline, the board would not meet in private to discuss the appointment and candidates would be informed that their names and applications would be subject to public review.

The CSBA declined to elaborate on its reasons behind the change.

But Weis has told trustees that state law requires the entire appointment process to be done in public. Unlike superintendents of local school districts, he said, the county job is an elected position that should be filled in full public view.

The board came under scrutiny late last month when Weis said he suspected trustees might try to hold an illegal, closed-door meeting to discuss the replacement process.

Trustees disputed that claim and said they would not violate open-meeting laws.

But several have said they are concerned about outing applicants during the screening process.

Trustee Dean Kunicki said Tuesday that he didn't want to lose candidates that might not want their names made public when they apply. It could potentially jeopardize their current positions, he said, and limit the applicant pool.

Trustee Mary Louise Peterson, however, has pushed for a completely transparent process, saying the only reason she would hire a search firm is to make sure that happens.

The board is scheduled to meet to discuss the issue again at 6 p.m. May 21 at the Ventura County Office of Education conference center, 5100 Adolfo Road in Camarillo.

Chris Meagher, president of the county office's teachers union, has asked the board to forego an outside search, saying there are qualified candidates within the organization. Appointing a current staff member would save money that could be used to benefit students, he said, and anyone else interested in the position would have an opportunity to run for the office in two years.

On Tuesday, Peterson asked the board to consider appointing from within the county office before expanding the search, but other trustees declined to support that motion.

"I do not object to appointing someone from within," Bates said Tuesday, but he does want to allow others to submit applications, as well.

Comments

Posted by JohnAlamillo on May 7, 2008 at 11:41 a.m. (Suggest removal)

How would you risk potentially jeopardizing their current position by being open. If an election were held the names would be in clear view.

Posted by JohnAndersen on May 8, 2008 at 7:58 p.m. (Suggest removal)

If a candidate is coming out of private enterprise, he/she may not want his current boss to know he is looking. This is a common concern/practice in hiring (like it or not) -- particularly in upper management.

Post your comment
(Requires free registration.)

Comments on this site are to be used for the discussion and/or debate of issues related to our stories and editorials.

Comments should not stray from the subject of the story or editorial.

We don't allow the following:

  • Comments that degrade others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation or disability.
  • Disparaging remarks, abusive language or obscene comments.
  • Threats, whether obvious or veiled.

We reserve the right to delete comments and/or ban users for these or other reasons we deem necessary.

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Username:

Password:
(Forgotten your password?)

Your Turn:

Click here to see additional features for Breaking News.

Download Podcast  Download this story as a podcast!