Home › News › County News
Commuter train to Santa Barbara in 2 years seen
Straight, narrow and almost always empty, the rail line between Ventura and Santa Barbara counties has always been the route not taken by commuters.
Tantalizingly close as it parallels the often-congested Highway 101, the rail line now might go from the route less-traveled to an active commuter line within two years.
Advocates for commuter rail and dozens of government officials from both counties are working on a plan to tweak Amtrak train schedules and coax Union Pacific Railroad officials into changing the times they send massive freight trains down the line and building "sidings" to allow the freight cars to pull over and make way for commuter trains.
"I'm an optimistic person, so I believe we will work out all the problems and make it happen," said Mary Travis, manager for the intercity rail and Metrolink program for the Ventura County Transportation Commission.
But Travis is still crossing her fingers because the many seemingly small obstacles have stalled past efforts. For instance, the rail line is owned and operated by Union Pacific. Its bread-and-butter is freight business. Many of the long trains running down the line are not on regular schedules, so it's difficult for the Omaha-based company to make room for a regular commuter route on a single-track line. Building sidings, however, could help.
'A lane and a train'
As for Amtrak, because of issues related mostly to its East Coast operation, the company isn't supposed to run "commuter train" service. Its current trains between Ventura and Santa Barbara counties are now scheduled at inconvenient times. The first northbound train does not leave Ventura until 9:20 a.m. and is often late. If a freight train is using the line, Amtrak must hold back its train. Also, the fare between Ventura and Santa Barbara is $16 one-way, far more than taking a bus.
But the potential led the Ventura County Transportation Commission to sign off on a plan with Santa Barbara last fall to get some sort of commuter rail system up and running within a few years.
Currently, about 4,000 people in Ventura ride Metrolink to points south, and Travis estimates as many as 2,000 might be willing to take the train north, given the right schedule and price.
The push for commuter train service couldn't come too soon, said Roger Horton, a Santa Barbara councilman and member of Transit/Rail Action for Commuters.
The group has been pushing "a lane and a train," the addition of a lane to Highway 101 and a rail line for the estimated 20,000 commuters traveling between the two counties.
Starting this year and continuing over the next 15 years, a series of big construction projects along the 101 corridor between Ventura and Santa Barbara promises to compound traffic congestion, said Horton.
"Traffic is going to get worse before it gets better, I believe," he said.
'Just seems obvious'
Horton and two fellow Santa Barbara City Council members gave a presentation on the commuter train plan to the Ventura City Council this week and plan on making similar presentations in Camarillo and Oxnard in the coming months, he said.
The looming highway projects include a $57 million job to add a lane on a two-mile stretch in Santa Barbara between Milpas Street and Hot Springs Road, and improvements to the interchange at Linden Road in Carpinteria.
The biggest project currently planned is a $116 million job to widen the freeway from Mussel Shoals through La Conchita and to the county line. That work isn't expected to begin until 2011, and some officials hope it will dovetail with more widening of the freeway through Carpinteria all the way into Santa Barbara. But that widening — particularly through Montecito — is controversial.
For many commuters, creating a rail service, widening the freeway and encouraging other driving alteratives seem like good solutions to increasing congestion.
"Some sort of light rail just seems obvious," said Mike Wyatt, an engineer who lives in Ventura and drives to Goleta every day.




Posted by THX1138 on March 1, 2008 at 8:38 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Another obstacle is changing the paradigm of how commuters that don't like to walk to and from the train station. Most are use to the convenience of their car. Also many commercial areas are not designed or planned with transportation in mind - typically cost drives the location.
In Europe the mindset is different, most are used to walking to their destination - a train/bus just gets them to the general area. Of course in the US most cities cover a wider area, so more train stations or bus service would be necessary.
If available, I would gladly take public transportation - the cost would be far less than what I pay for petrol. And, I'm not even driving a gas-guzzler...
Posted by billybob_jcv on March 1, 2008 at 4:09 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Union Pacific freight trains do NOT wait in sidings for Metrolink trains - it's the other way 'round. I ride the Metrolink from Ventura to LA almost every day, and the UP dispatchers can cause delays at any time. I love riding the trains, but if you absolutely, positively need to be at work by a specific time, you probably shouldn't take the train!
Posted by sbcommuter on May 21, 2008 at 9:40 a.m. (Suggest removal)
The first paragraph of Scott Hadly's article is completely false. Mr. Hadly obviously is ignoring the facts or failed to ask the right people. I spent years working with Union Pacific engineers and conductors in Santa Barbara and Goleta, and the only time available on the tracks would be about 3AM, and it was not at the same time every night either. It will cost about $500 MILLION just to build the required sidings, so I do not understand the reader above thinking that he would save money by using a train. European cities were designed for 5mph donkeys, and that is why they have to put up with public transpotation. If you think that they like it, then why is auto use increasing over there so quickly? Train in 2 years? He is dreaming or lying. I predict 20 years and $2 BILLION for a few hundred riders. The politicians and associates that skim the funds will be retired by then and taxpayers will be stuck paying the bills.
(Requires free registration.)
Article discussions on this site are to support community debates of issues related to our stories and editorials.
Discussions should not stray from the subject of the story or editorial.
We do not allow the following:
We reserve the right to delete threads and/or ban users for these or other reasons we deem necessary.
Opinions are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.