Weather | Beachcam
Login | Contact Us | Staff | Site Map | Archives | Alerts | Electronic Edition | Subscribe to the paper

HomeNewsCounty News

Chance to Gather surplus crops from fields lessens

Farm gleaning curtailed


Download Podcast  Download this story as a podcast!

Video: Mutual benefits of gleaning

 
Fruit that would otherwise rot in private orchards is picked fresh and given to the needy.
Watch now »
Photos by Jason Redmond / Star staff
The Rev. Ed McRae of Simi Valley, who is retired, picks oranges from a private orchard in Camarillo. FOOD Share says most calls for gleaning come from homeowners who want to give away the citrus and avocados growing in their yards before they rot.

Photos by Jason Redmond / Star staff The Rev. Ed McRae of Simi Valley, who is retired, picks oranges from a private orchard in Camarillo. FOOD Share says most calls for gleaning come from homeowners who want to give away the citrus and avocados growing in their yards before they rot.

Retired engineer Conrad Kootz of Camarillo helps collect oranges for FOOD Share. The number of major growers allowing gleaning has dropped from 20 to half a dozen, according to the agency.

Retired engineer Conrad Kootz of Camarillo helps collect oranges for FOOD Share. The number of major growers allowing gleaning has dropped from 20 to half a dozen, according to the agency.

Volunteers are salvaging far fewer crops for Ventura County's needy as land and fuel prices rise, farmland is developed and the crews available to pick surplus crops dwindle.

Officials at FOOD Share, the county's regional food bank, say the amount of fresh produce gleaned from local farms and ranches has plummeted by thousands of pounds a month over the past few years, forcing more crops to be trucked in at higher cost.

Managers say the downturn hasn't hurt supply; they're giving away more fruits and vegetables than ever at a time when the agency is committed to fighting obesity in poor neighborhoods. But some say there's much less choice.

"We certainly are not getting the variety of foods we used to have," said Cecilia Rexford, who has operated the food pantry at Camarillo Community Church for 18 years. "We used to have things like broccoli every week, spinach, celery, lettuce, stuff that was grown locally. It was very good produce, better than some of the stuff you got in the grocery stores."

The decline comes at a time when there's a desperate need for food with growing demand and rising prices, said Sandy Bishop, chief executive officer of FOOD Share.

"We need to focus on how we can increase gleaning," she said.

Changes in farm economy

The number of major growers allowing gleaning has dropped from 20 to half a dozen, officials said. Instead, the calls come from homeowners who want to give away the citrus and avocados growing in their yards before they rot.

"We used to pick carrots, onions, celery, radishes," volunteer Joe Birg, 75, said as he harvested Valencia oranges one day last month at an upscale home in Camarillo. "We don't pick any of that anymore. The only thing now is oranges, avocados, lemons."

FOOD Share officials blame changes in the farm economy. So much land is being leased out to multiple interests that it's hard to find farm managers who can grant permission for volunteers to pick the fields. Growers beset by high land costs are harvesting and replanting before the sun sets. Many farmers also are raising lucrative berries instead of the lower-profit vegetables the agency needs.

"Because strawberries and raspberries are so prevalent, it drastically reduced the number of other available crops to pick," said Jayson Muelder, operations manager for the nonprofit serving 38,000 people a month. "The number of farms with excess crop is not out there."

Personnel decisions blamed

Bishop said temporary setbacks fueled the decrease, namely last year's freeze and farmers' reluctance to allow volunteers in fields after the salmonella and botulism scares.

However, volunteers blame personnel decisions at FOOD Share for part of the problem.

During 12 years on the job, gleaning supervisor Roger Davis drove around the county looking for fields, speaking Spanish with foremen to find jobs. After Davis retired in 2006, Muelder decided that his replacement should spend only three hours a day on the task.

Muelder said farm economics had changed so much since Davis took on the assignment in the early 1990s that it was no longer worth it to assign someone full time.

"With what's out there and available, that's really all it necessitates," he said.

Davis' replacement, Andy Murphy, said some volunteer gleaners quit after Davis retired. Others became disaffected the next year when FOOD Share's board decided to stop allowing volunteers to take home free food. Until then, each gleaner had been able to take home a bucket of produce from the fields.

Former gleaner Don Vanasse, 76, of Camarillo said it was one reason he quit.

"It just meant that we're not that important," said the retired helicopter mechanic.

"A lot of people felt the same way. What's the point? We can't take a bucket of oranges home. The stuff was going to go bad anyway."

Bishop recommended stopping the giveaways. The Internal Revenue Service could view that as compensation, jeopardizing the agency's tax-exempt status, she said.

The IRS allows occasional and small gifts of "low market value" to volunteers, but, Bishop said, the gleaners were taking food regularly, some of it high-cost items. "Avocados are not low market value," she said.

America's Second Harvest, which supplies food to a network of food banks including FOOD Share, also bans the practice.

Roster of volunteers shrinks

The number of gleaners is now down to a couple of dozen, a dip officials blame on gasoline prices and the fact that baby boomers still in the work force are not showing up to replace the older volunteers.

As late as 1993, crews would often pick at two sites a day, but they may go to only a few sites a week now.

Davis said he had a roster of 150 volunteers, with 40 available at any one time. By the time he left, the available crew had shrunk to 15 or 20, he said.

Volunteers say half a dozen now show up on an average pick and sometimes as few as three.

Nine turned up to pick citrus at Judi and Clark McKay's home in Camarillo one morning late last month. With property containing 120 citrus trees, the couple needs help harvesting the bounty that would otherwise drop and rot.

Photos by Jason Redmond / Star staff
Officials at FOOD Share say the amount of fresh produce gleaned from local farms and ranches has plummeted by thousands of pounds a month over the past few years.

Photos by Jason Redmond / Star staff Officials at FOOD Share say the amount of fresh produce gleaned from local farms and ranches has plummeted by thousands of pounds a month over the past few years.

As the smell of oranges wafted in the air, the volunteers, wearing hats, work clothes, gloves and sunscreen, picked ripening oranges. They enjoy the views, the feeling of doing something good, the friendship, the exercise.

"You don't have to go to Gold's Gym after this," said retired hairdresser Dina DeSimone, 62, of Camarillo.

Some fear that gleaning, rare in the nation as a whole, is fading away.

The Second Harvest Bank of Orange County started purely as a gleaning operation 25 years ago, but with urbanization found few jobs. Instead, the agency grows local produce on land owned by the city of Irvine and the Orange County Register.

Those plots generated 260,000 pounds of celery, cauli-flower, green onions, broccoli and squash last year. The yield from gleaning is meager.

"If we get a call to glean, we will," said General Manager Jerry Creekpaum. "It's usually somebody's backyard orchard."

'Freight is astronomical'

Many of the state's food banks, including those in Ventura and Orange counties, get the bulk of their produce from the California Association of Food Banks. The agency solicits donations from growers, who provide the food either free or at deeply discounted prices. It is surplus product or unsuitable for the market because of size or appearance.

Gleaning produces perhaps only 10 percent of the 3 million pounds the Oxnard food bank gives away annually. Muelder said the state association provides a more reliable supply, albeit at higher cost.

"We're paying up to 5 to 10 cents a pound, plus freight," Muelder said. "Freight is astronomical. It has gone from $600 a load to $750 a load."

But it's unlikely that gleaning will meet the need, Muelder said, adding that at its peak it totaled perhaps 500,000 pounds a year.

Stricter regulations on farms

Now it is far less. About 200,000 pounds were gleaned in 2006, a figure that dropped to roughly 135,000 pounds last year. So far this year, crews have harvested less than 35,000 pounds.

Conrad Kootz picks oranges in Camarillo. The number of gleaners is now down to a couple of dozen, a dip officials blame on the fact that baby boomers still in the work force are not showing up to replace the older volunteers.

Conrad Kootz picks oranges in Camarillo. The number of gleaners is now down to a couple of dozen, a dip officials blame on the fact that baby boomers still in the work force are not showing up to replace the older volunteers.

"I see there being stricter and stricter regulations on produce farms," Muelder said. "I think it's going to get harder and harder to be out in some of the fields. As more homes are built, it's going to mean less food available for donation."

Only a handful of food banks nationwide have gleaning programs, said Ross Fraser, spokesman for America's Second Harvest.

They tend to be in agricultural areas such as Ventura County, where seven friends started gleaning in the late 1970s to feed homeless people living under a Ventura bridge. The group asked farmers to let them pick surplus crops in their fields, using a Biblical passage in the Book of Leviticus as their guide.

"It says, Don't glean the corners of the field, save it for the poor and strangers," said Jewel Pedi, a gleaner who helped found FOOD Share.

That was a different time, when farmers could leave a field for a few days so volunteers could come in and glean. No more, farmers say.

Land is at a premium

Scott Deardorff, president of the Farm Bureau of Ventura County, said land is at a premium, costing $2,000 to $2,500 per acre per year to lease.

"You have to turn it over as soon as you can, to get another crop in there," the Oxnard grower said. "Our window for gleaners is all but gone."

FOOD Share officials are looking for ways to reverse the trend.

Among the solutions being entertained: bringing volunteers in on Saturdays and asking churches, social and fraternal groups to provide gleaners. Davis also has agreed to help the new gleaning supervisor, Lance Ferguson, find fields.

Muelder said the agency isn't giving up on its cornerstone.

"Gleaning is what FOOD Share was founded on," Muelder said. "We fully embrace it."

Discussions

There are 8 comments to this article.   

Comments are found beneath the Yahoo! ad below.

Comments

Posted by JohnGC on June 8, 2008 at 8:01 a.m. (Suggest removal)

"...The number of gleaners is now down to a couple of dozen, a dip officials blame on gasoline prices and the fact that baby boomers still in the work force are not showing up to replace the older volunteers..."

Here's a very radical concept: have the folks who recieve the gleaned food, become gleaners!

Posted by cassandra on June 8, 2008 at 9:43 a.m. (Suggest removal)

For MM: Global warming we will likely occasion more frequent and deeper droughts here. Currently the decreased snow pack and precipitation in the northern part of the state has lowered the state's supply as has the likelihood of losing Colorado River water. Thus the governor declared a water emergency recently.

Ventura's water comes to from our Ojai Valley watershed and the Santa Clara River so the supply is insulated. (East county gets its water from MWD and is connected statewide.)That doesn't mean we should be profligate with what we have, however.

I recommend Brad Lancaster's series of books on "Rainwater Harvesting" to help householders assist in the water saving effort and lower their water bills. Nature gives us much more water than we use wisely or hold on to.

Many areas of Socal are beginning to consider radical recycling, some even aiming at toilet to tap systems, others merely using graywater recovery, low water landscaping, and other water saving concepts.

Specific to the topic: many local residents have seen peak oil coming and the subsequent difficulty of getting food from distant places. Increasingly people are growing their own and should have surpluses soon, as when crops ripen there is more than one household can use. This is organic (unless your neighbor sprays recklessly) and local and couldn't be better nutritonally. The Gleaners could connect with these good people through the Ventura Organic Garden Club (www.vccool.org).

Also the Grow Food Party Crew (google it) creates food gardens for people who have space but not expertise. They specialize in permaculture designs for aiding in sustainability. Food Share beneficiaries with even small patches of land might contact these good citizens.

Posted by cassandra on June 8, 2008 at 10:10 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Thanks, MM.

Alas. I haven't looked at the vccool site for a long time. Imagine my surprise when I noted all links to the garden club had been omitted. I have an e mail to the web mistress and will report back later. One can contact her with a link on the site, and I'm sure she would be willing to forward to the garden club.

Posted by jeff93024 on June 8, 2008 at 11:42 a.m. (Suggest removal)

JohnGC:

I noticed that comment about baby boomers and gasoline prices, too. I thought the same thing you did: why not have the recipients help with the gleaning? Then I remembered that The Star never misses a chance to engage in a little boomer-bashing whenever possible. What's with that, anyway? I can think of several dozen other groups upon whom the blame could be (just as ridiculously) placed.

If the food gleaning programs are failing, maybe it's time to look where one usually needs to look when things turn bad; at the management. In this case, they seem to be blaming everybody and everything but themselves for the things that are going wrong, and that kind of behavior is usually a pretty good indicator that the trouble is in the head office.

By the way, doesn't the State of California have several hundred thousand non-violent prisoners who could be used to glean crops, or even grow them, as opposed to sitting on their dead butts in our jails and prisons and doing nothing besides costing us a fortune?

Posted by cassandra on June 8, 2008 at 2 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Normally, rape and murder are kind of violent.

Posted by JohnGC on June 9, 2008 at 9:22 a.m. (Suggest removal)

jeff93024: I do believe that it would be very un-PC to ask the recipients of the give aways to participate in replenishing the stores. They are obviously too busy, and it would be an insult to their honor and integrity. LOL!

There are scores of non-violent offenders within the prison system. Take a look at the large number of prisoners that work the fire lines in those tragic emergencies.

Interesting to me that scores of folks quit the gleaning efforts, with the installation of a new manager. I think you nailed that one: Look to the nut behind the wheel!

Posted by abbyjacks on June 9, 2008 at 1:02 p.m. (Suggest removal)

So we would rather the produce spoil then trying to deal with all the red tape. We Americans forget how good we have it. People are starving in our own back yard and farmers & big business can only think about the almighty green dollar.

America is only as strong as it's people...

Posted by telcofolks on June 9, 2008 at 8:13 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Fighting obesity in poor neighborhoods... LOL





Article discussions on this site are to support community debates of issues related to our stories and editorials.

Discussions should not stray from the subject of the story or editorial.

We do not allow the following:

  • Posts that degrade others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation or disability.
  • Disparaging remarks, abusive language or obscene comments.
  • Threats, whether obvious or veiled.

We reserve the right to delete threads and/or ban users for these or other reasons we deem necessary.

Opinions are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Discuss this article
(Requires free registration.)

Username:

Password:
(Forgotten your password?)

Your Turn:

Please download the latest version of Adobe Flash Player, or enable JavaScript for your browser to view the video player.