Weather | Beachcam
Login | Contact Us | Staff | Site Map | Archives | Alerts | Electronic Edition | Subscribe to the paper

HomeNewsLocal News

City not taking sides in funding suit

School construction money at center of dispute


Download Podcast  Download this story as a podcast!

The city of Oxnard appears to be changing its mind about what to do with $15.5 million in school construction funds the city manager previously said might go to a developer instead of the Oxnard School District.

"The city of Oxnard is not here to say that we are in favor of either party at this point," Mayor Tom Holden said during Tuesday's City Council meeting.

Councilman Tim Flynn said Wednesday that the city should not take sides in the dispute between the school district and developer D.R. Horton Los Angeles Holding Co. Inc. over money intended to build a school in the Seabridge development. The neighborhood is next to Channel Islands Harbor.

The district filed suit over the money June 11, listing the city of Oxnard and D.R. Horton as respondents.

Rick Miller, the district's superintendent, said Wednesday that Holden had framed the issue "appropriately, that this is an issue between the schools and the developer."

"I believe the court will give us a timely answer," he said. A hearing date has not been set.

School officials said they decided to sue after City Manager Ed Sotelo notified them in May that he intended to transfer $7 million in school construction funds for the Seabridge neighborhood to D.R. Horton and might hand over the entire $15.5 million paid in fees by homeowners in the upscale development.

The money, which is controlled by the city, is held in a community facilities district fund.

Sotelo is on vacation and could not be reached for comment.

Alan Holmberg, an assistant city attorney, said D.R. Horton's position is that it already has paid the school district $7 million under a separate impact mitigation agreement, and that the school money in the community facilities district fund should be given to the company.

D.R. Horton spokeswoman Jessica L. Hansen issued the following statement Tuesday: "We look forward to the opportunity to have the Oxnard School District lawsuit resolved by an impartial judge. In the meantime, D.R. Horton is fully committed to supporting the needs of the Oxnard School District by honoring its contractual obligations under the parties' existing agreement, which to date has included payment of over $6 million in impact fees."

Holden said Wednesday he first heard about the district's suit two weeks ago, and he did not know the basis for Sotelo's intention to hand over the money to D.R. Horton.

City Attorney Gary Gillig said he could not discuss any advice he might have given Sotelo about the matter, citing attorney-client privilege.

Councilman Tim Flynn said Wednesday that he had not been informed by Sotelo about the dispute and that this was something he and other council members should have been notified about.

Councilman John Zaragoza said he had no comment on the matter, and the two other council members did not respond to calls for comment.

If the district does not get the $15.5 million, it would be very difficult to build a school in the Seabridge area, said Yuri Calderon, the district's general counsel.

The district has an option to buy 6 acres within the development for the school, and the city has an option to buy 3 acres for sports and recreational facilities that would be shared with the district.

The current construction estimate for a school for 600 to 1,000 children at Seabridge is about $30 million, Calderon said.

Calderon contends the impact mitigation agreement has nothing to do with the community facilities district money.

Because the amounts payable by developers to school districts under impact mitigation agreements are limited by state law, it is not uncommon for community facilities districts to be created to cover the full cost of school construction, he said.

Discussions

Posted by ThePhantomKnows on July 24, 2008 at 3:44 p.m. (Suggest removal)

The story last Saturday was very clear. The city of Oxnard planned to take the money from the School District and give it to the Developer, $15.5 million dollars per the story. Then we hear the Mayor state at the last city council meeting the city is only the Trustees for the money. But the School District had to file a lawsuit to protect the interest of the children's future school site. It appears the Banker (City) is leaving the safe open, the doors unlock, and the alarm is turned off, and informing a third party of the situation. Luckly for the tax payers and the children; the Oxnard School District file a lawsuit so a bad problem can be corrected. And yet, City Council Members appear to be running for cover(no comment)and saying they knew nothing about this. Thank you VC Star for covering this story.

Posted by missudpat on July 28, 2008 at 8:35 a.m. (Suggest removal)

D R Horton has interesting accounting methods and a pattern for mischaracterizing such accounts. Horton may think that it has 'earned' the $15M that its 'due' when in reality, it only needs the funds for its dismal cash flow. In NJ, they mischaracterized their work force to avoid payroll taxes, PA mischaracterized upgrades to not pay transfer taxes, CA mischaracterized improvements to not pay transfer taxes, Fl claimed that utility (sewer and electric) development was the city's responsibility and that the escrow fund should be released....... As long as Horton lines its pockets with municipal or any other money, that corporations happy. The muni's and development residents are usually left holding the bag. Search the web for all the above story links: 'D R Horton New Jersey (Florida etc.) files suit'



Discuss this article
(Requires free registration.)

Article discussions on this site are to support community debates of issues related to our stories and editorials.

Discussions should not stray from the subject of the story or editorial.

We do not allow the following:

  • Posts that degrade others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation or disability.
  • Disparaging remarks, abusive language or obscene comments.
  • Threats, whether obvious or veiled.

We reserve the right to delete threads and/or ban users for these or other reasons we deem necessary.

Opinions are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Username:

Password:
(Forgotten your password?)

Your Turn:

Loading videos... If you don't see them shortly, you may need to download the Flash Player.