Weather | Beachcam
Login | Contact Us | Staff | Site Map | Archives | Alerts | Electronic Edition | Subscribe to the paper

HomeCrime, Courts & Public SafetyCourts

Boy testifies about 911 call concerning ex-officer

Suspect accused of assaulting, imprisoning former girlfriend


Download Podcast  Download this story as a podcast!

Opening statements were made Friday in Ventura County Superior Court in the trial of a former Oxnard police officer accused of barricading himself in his Ventura home last year, imprisoning and assaulting his then-live-in girlfriend.

Afterward, the prosecution called its first witness, a 10-year-old boy who testified about an unrelated incident involving the defendant.

The witness, whose name is being withheld by The Star because he is a minor, testified about a 911 phone call he made in April. The boy said he made the call because he was told to do so by his mother, who is currently dating the defendant, Robert Perez Jr.

The boy said he had been asleep and when he woke up he heard "a banging on the table" as his mother and Perez argued.

He added that he later heard Perez say, "If you push me or shove me, I'll hurt you real bad."

The boy's testimony is being given because, prosecutors say, Perez has a propensity for violence.

He is charged with assault with a firearm, false imprisonment by violence, three counts of dissuading a witness from reporting a crime, battery and resisting arrest.

Perez surrendered to Ventura police about 7:20 p.m. on July 29, 2007, outside a home in the 10000 block of Candytuft Street.

He lived with his then-girlfriend, Denise Shadinger, and used a firearm to keep her from leaving, according to prosecutors. She is an Oxnard police officer, prosecutors said.

Accusations listed

Perez is accused of barricading himself in the residence with a handgun and an assault rifle after Ventura police responded to a report of a domestic dispute at the home more than four hours earlier.

During opening statements, prosecutor Andrea Tischler described Perez as someone who always needs to be in control of everything, and "this extends to the women he dates" and "the situations that he is placed in."

Perez's lawyer, Mark Pachowicz, urged jurors to wait to hear all the evidence and testimony before drawing any conclusions. He said Shadinger gave statements that weren't truthful and exaggerated what was going on, which, he said, resulted in the escalation of an incident where the SWAT team responded to the 911 call.

"Just because Miss Shadinger says it doesn't mean that it's true," said Pachowicz, adding that she told "half the story" to police.

Tischler told jurors that Perez and Shadinger owned a home together and said the July 29 incident was the second time she was assaulted by Perez. Tischler said the first time was on May 1, when Perez found a note at work and believed that Shadinger might be having an affair.

Tischler said Perez confronted Shadinger, and an argument ensued, followed by Perez punching and kicking Shadinger. She didn't report that incident but told friends of the assault, the prosecutor said.

Photographs of the alleged May 1 injuries were shown to jurors, who also heard the 911 calls of the July 29 situation to the dispatcher.

At one point in the tape, a voice identified as Shadinger's is heard saying to the dispatcher in a calm voice, "We are all right. We're fine."

Actions in house described

Tischler told jurors that Perez held Shadinger, who suffered very minor injuries, against her will for several hours. Shadinger at one point was cowering inside a closet, and Perez pointed a gun six to 12 inches from her head, the prosecutor said.

Perez also shattered a telephone, took away Shadinger's car keys and twice kept her from completing calls to 911, said Tischler, who added that Shadinger was allowed to leave at 2:30 p.m.

While the SWAT team surrounded the house, Perez drank seven beers and refused to come out of the house. Tischler said Perez heard what was going on outside through his police radio.

Tischler said Perez told police that he wanted to talk to his lawyer and a bail bondsman, and gave police instructions on how to arrest him. After he was arrested, Tischler said, Perez told officers that he could have "finished you up before when I had you in my sights."

Pachowicz told jurors there was a good reason his client didn't follow an officer's instructions as he was being arrested but didn't describe it.

Discussions

Posted by jgonzales80530 on July 20, 2008 at 10:15 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Police like this former-officer Perez are the reason why some community members do not trust the police. How do they make it on the force with such violent behaviors? And they are supposed to protect and serve us? Yeah right. Damn trigger-happy police.

Posted by Optimist on July 20, 2008 at 10:44 p.m. (Suggest removal)

You don't condem the entire department over one mans actions which haven't even been found to be true.

There's a lot of men and women who put it all on the line to protect the people. They had nothing to do with any of this nonsense. Are we going to fault them too?

Posted by alex.poet on July 21, 2008 at 1:09 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Don't forget about the Oxnard police shooting people in allies when they are unarmed.

I almost got hit by a cop yesterday, I came to a stop sign and about 15 feet before I reach the line a cop comes barreling around the corner making a left turn into my lane and then swerving to avoid me.

I'm sure there are plenty of nice Oxnard police officers out there. I've just never had the pleasure of ever meeting one.

Its like we are living with a militia.

Posted by janabanana71 on July 22, 2008 at 12:21 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Law enforcement as a whole is unfortunately riddled with marital affairs and alcoholism. This is mostly because of the type of work they're in, always having to have your guard up, long hours, etc. This is not an Oxnard PD thing, believe me. It happens in every police department across the country. So don't use this as another reason to bash a hard working police dept. That dept has over 150 employees and we are only hearing of but a few who are having "issues". They don't epitomize the entire dept or its ideals.

Posted by alex.poet on July 23, 2008 at 8:52 a.m. (Suggest removal)

They are only as strong as their weakest link.



Discuss this article
(Requires free registration.)

Article discussions on this site are to support community debates of issues related to our stories and editorials.

Discussions should not stray from the subject of the story or editorial.

We do not allow the following:

  • Posts that degrade others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation or disability.
  • Disparaging remarks, abusive language or obscene comments.
  • Threats, whether obvious or veiled.

We reserve the right to delete threads and/or ban users for these or other reasons we deem necessary.

Opinions are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Username:

Password:
(Forgotten your password?)

Your Turn:

Loading videos... If you don't see them shortly, you may need to download the Flash Player.