Home › Education › Education: K-12
8th-graders must test in algebra
Governor blasted for last-minute school-board action
SACRAMENTO — California's Board of Education voted Wednesday to require all eighth-graders to be tested in algebra, acting upon a forceful, last-minute recommendation by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger.
The governor immediately applauded the board's action to make California the first state in the nation to require algebra at such an early level. He called algebra "the key that unlocks the world of science, innovation, engineering and technology."
Schwarzenegger fueled a political firestorm by issuing a letter asking for the mandate the night before Wednesday's state Board of Education meeting.
The Schwarzenegger-appointed board had been scheduled to consider adopting a new eighth-grade math test proposed by Superintendent of Public Instruction Jack O'Connell. Instead, it voted 8-1 to adopt Schwarzenegger's recommendation.
O'Connell, a Democrat, blasted Schwarzenegger during the nearly four-hour hearing, saying he had never seen such meddling by a governor at the last minute on a policy change that deserved rigorous public debate.
"The governor never took the time — or perhaps wasn't aware of it — the governor never took the time to weigh in until last night," on a policy that "will have significant impact on literally tens of thousands of students in our state," O'Connell said. The eighth-grade test O'Connell proposed would have measured some algebra standards, but not all.
Just half of California's eighth-graders currently take full algebra, up from about 34 percent four years ago. But O'Connell said only about 23 percent of those score as proficient or above on standardized tests, and the rate is lower for black, Latino and poor students.
About half of California's 6.1 million students are considered poor, and a quarter are still learning English.
Critics say pushing students into higher-level math too early could increase the dropout rate. Algebra I is a requirement to graduate from high school, but many students need remedial classes or a pre-algebra course first.
Ventura County educators agree, said Valerie Chrisman, the county's executive director of curriculum, instruction and continuous improvement.
She said she understood that people had concerns about instruction becoming too watered down, or that some kids might never learn algebra. But that wasn't what was being proposed.
An exact number of local students who take algebra by eighth grade wasn't available, but Chrisman said more and more are taking the subject. That's happened because of intervention programs for students, teacher training and other support.
But even if more resources were made available, Chrisman said some students wouldn't be prepared to learn algebra in middle school.
There needs to be a balance, she said, and school officials need to consider what is educationally sound, right for the student and keep expectations high.
But state board members agreed with Schwarzenegger's contention that the state superintendent's proposed exam could set up a two-tiered system that fast-tracked some students into regular algebra while allowing others to take a less rigorous general math test.
The governor and his supporters argued all students should be held to the same high standard.
"I think this is a bold, innovative way of setting that high expectation and then finding the resources to get there. Otherwise we're going to be sitting here in 10 years saying the same thing," board member David Lopez said.
The state will phase in the algebra requirement over the next three years.
Several of the more than 30 speakers who raised concerns about the test noted that California already has a shortage of qualified math and science teachers. Board members worried how the state could teach algebra to nearly 500,000 eighth-graders in such a short time without dramatically boosting education funding. California already is facing a $15.2 billion budget shortfall for the fiscal year that started July 1.
Still, Schwarzenegger's education secretary, Dave Long, said the governor would help find the billions of dollars it would cost to boost what he referred to as California's education "infrastructure." He did not say where the money would come from.
After the meeting, Long said Schwarzenegger has pledged to make the funding a priority.
During a conference call with reporters after the state board's vote, O'Connell said "a promise (on education funding) was made that he can't keep."
Jim Aschwanden was the lone board member to vote against the mandatory algebra test, which, he said, was an ill-thought-out plan "hatched over the past 48 hours."
"We have research that tells us it's a fantasy. Not all children are developmentally ready to take algebra in the eighth grade," said Aschwanden, the executive director of the California Agricultural Teachers' Association.
The state was under pressure from the U.S. Department of Education to change its current eighth-grade math test by Aug. 1 or face losing up to $4.1 million in funding.
— Star staff writer Cheri Carlson contributed to this report.




Posted by Poppa on July 10, 2008 at 8:35 a.m. (Suggest removal)
8 of the 9 people Arnold put on the State Board of Ed are Charter School owners or advocates. Arnold is working hard to get more charters because the owners of Charters then kick-back money to campaign committees he controls. If you want to know why Arnold did this follow the money!
Posted by aloparc on July 15, 2008 at 2:47 p.m. (Suggest removal)
One wonders how well CVUSD will perform under this new requirement given the fact that K-5 students will continue to use the grossly inferior Everyday Math program.
It is telling that CVUSD middle school teachers urged the board to adopt math programs that would transition students out of Everyday Math at the 4th grade. Unfortunately the upper grade teachers were largely ignored and the school board voted 4 to 1 to keep EM in K-5 classrooms.
EM and its discovery based teaching methods can leave students 2 years behind other students who use programs which teach math to mastery.
Posted by aloparc on July 15, 2008 at 3:05 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Consistently Charter schools are proving that they can do a better job of educating students than the regular public schools.
Charters accomplish far more academically and at a lower cost than the regular public schools.
If the state board members appointed by Arnold support charter schools, then I am pleased to have them serving at the state level.
No Charter school I am aware of is making money, since they must pay rent for their facilities. The use of the word kick back in the previous post seems to imply that charter school funding is being put back into Arnold's pocket; that is highly unlikely.
That the supporters of charter schools would also choose to financially support politicians that are in favor of this education model seems reasonable to me.
(Requires free registration.)
Article discussions on this site are to support community debates of issues related to our stories and editorials.
Discussions should not stray from the subject of the story or editorial.
We do not allow the following:
We reserve the right to delete threads and/or ban users for these or other reasons we deem necessary.
Opinions are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.