Weather | Beachcam
Login | Contact Us | Staff | Site Map | Archives | Alerts | Electronic Edition | Subscribe to the paper

HomeCrime, Courts & Public SafetyCourts

Judge to resolve murder-case immunity deal


Download Podcast  Download this story as a podcast!

A judge will try next month to untangle an apparent immunity deal that prosecutors gave a defendant who was initially arrested in a 2006 Ventura murder case. The man later became a key prosecution witness and later was rearrested and charged in the case.

If Superior Court Judge Edward Brodie decides that murder suspect Peter Rodriguez was given immunity from prosecution for the January 2006 stabbing of John Orrantia, 28, of Ventura, Rodriguez could be set free.

Brodie, who described the murder case as having "many twists and turns," set a hearing on the immunity issue for Aug. 12.

Appearing frustrated at times, Brodie said at a hearing Tuesday that he could only guess what prosecutors promised Rodriguez in exchange for his cooperation and testimony against co-defendant Gustavio Tapia.

"What is the scope of that immunity, I do not know. Everybody wants me to make a decision based on nothing," he said. "There are many kinds of immunity. The people (prosecutors) have a burden to try and tell me what this immunity was."

On Tuesday, Brodie said he's presided over many cases, and this was the first where immunity was given but no written agreement exists.

Rodriguez's attorney, Martin Zaehringer, told the judge that he wants charges against Rodriguez dismissed.

But Tapia's lawyer, Ron Bamieh, contends his client is not guilty and that it was Tapia's longtime friend, Rodriguez, who fatally stabbed Orrantia on Jan. 15, 2006. His brother, Orlando Orrantia, was wounded in the attack.

Charges against Rodriguez were dropped. He was rearrested in March, county records indicate.

Senior Deputy District Attorney Stacy Ratner told the judge that Rodriguez initially claimed to be 10 feet away from the stabbing and was a witness. After he was cross-examined at the preliminary hearing, prosecutors began to doubt his testimony, Ratner said.

After Rodriguez testified against Tapia, prosecutors moved him and his family to San Diego under a witness protection program.

At a hearing this year, Ratner gave Bamieh a copy of an agreement that did not contain any signatures. In the agreement, Rodriguez was given immunity from prosecution for assault with a deadly weapon, according to Ratner.

Discussions

Posted by JesusMalverde on July 9, 2008 at 6:26 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Was it necessary to write in the paper what city the family was moved to? Couldn't you just have said that they were moved away and leave out the area? I hope nothing happens to them.

Posted by Sneed_Hearn on July 9, 2008 at 10:24 a.m. (Suggest removal)

I thought that was pretty cold too, Jesus.

Posted by sirdvsdsw on July 9, 2008 at 10:57 a.m. (Suggest removal)

LMAO!!!!! I think the Star should let everyone know about D.U.I. check points. Date, time, and location would be great.

Posted by MiMi08 on July 9, 2008 at 9:40 p.m. (Suggest removal)

I agree with Jesus, I can't believe that you editors would put people's families in danger by putting their location in the paper! Knowing that they are in the Witness Protection Program!That is wrong and ignorant on your behalf. Hey I guess a story is more important than a life to you people. Stick to the story and the basics next time and less on little details like those that might get people in trouble! REMEMBER THEY ARE IN THE WITNESS PROTECTION PROGRAM FOR A REASON!

Posted by SUNNY on July 10, 2008 at 10:23 a.m. (Suggest removal)

I hope they didn't give enough info. (like what city) that they'll be found!!! DUH!



Discuss this article
(Requires free registration.)

Article discussions on this site are to support community debates of issues related to our stories and editorials.

Discussions should not stray from the subject of the story or editorial.

We do not allow the following:

  • Posts that degrade others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation or disability.
  • Disparaging remarks, abusive language or obscene comments.
  • Threats, whether obvious or veiled.

We reserve the right to delete threads and/or ban users for these or other reasons we deem necessary.

Opinions are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Username:

Password:
(Forgotten your password?)

Your Turn:

Loading videos... If you don't see them shortly, you may need to download the Flash Player.