Home › News › Other News
Aging inmates add to state prison strain, taxpayer costs
Photo by Rich Pedroncelli
AP
An inmate wheels himself through a checkpoint at the California Medical Facility in Vacaville.
Photo by Rich Pedroncelli
AP
Ron Anderson of Victorville is serving time at California Medical Facility in Vacaville for involuntary manslaughter. Aging inmates cost two to three times as much to incarcerate as younger prisoners.
VACAVILLE — Louis Rodriguez, a lifelong thief, is costing California taxpayers a lot of money.
So are others like him, aging criminals locked away for life or extended sentences who require expensive, ongoing medical treatment.
The state's expanding prison population and the increasing average age of its inmates appear to be key factors behind one of the most contentious issues facing California lawmakers. They are at odds over whether to approve $7 billion to build medical units for a prison healthcare system that has been ruled unconstitutional.
The money has been ordered by a federal court receiver who has been placed in charge of medical care in the state's 33 adult prisons.
Rodriguez is among those requiring pricey care.
He is serving a life sentence after being convicted of a "third strike" for stealing candy and cheese from a Los Angeles County grocery store. The conviction in 2000 followed another petty theft and a string of robberies 30 years ago.
The 66-year-old inmate is in the California Medical Facility in Vacaville, coping with the final stages of terminal liver disease. Parole officials rejected his petition for compassionate release, so he most likely will spend the rest of his days in the prison hospice.
"For people who are old and feeble, hopefully we'll be left to die in peace," Rodriguez said. "I'm waiting for that phone call that says you can go home to die. That's all I got left."
Compassionate release
Aging inmates cost two to three times as much to incarcerate as younger prisoners, an average $98,000 to $138,000 a year.
From 1980 to 2007, the average age of California inmates increased from 27 to 37.
The prisons hold more than 22,000 inmates older than 50, or about 13 percent of the overall adult inmate population. In 1998, the number was 9,820, or 6 percent of the prison population.
Prison authorities say inmates age faster than the general population because of stress, a history of drug use, poor medical care throughout their lives and other factors. A 50-year-old inmate can have the physical and mental condition of someone 10 years older.
At the end of 2007, California housed 4,805 inmates 60 and older, or about 3 percent of the prison population. A decade ago, that number was 1,951, or just more than 1 percent of all prisoners.
Prison populations nationwide also are aging.
The number of inmates 55 and older in state and federal prisons increased from 44,200, or 3.3 percent of the population in 2000, to 80,200, or 5.3 percent in 2006, according to the most recent statistics available from the U.S. Justice Department.
The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation expects its older-than-60 population to increase 80 percent by 2012.
That rise is due in part to tougher sentencing laws passed in recent years that send convicts away for longer stretches.
Some advocates say the state could save money by giving compassionate release to older, infirm inmates. A year ago, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger said he was open to releasing "the old, feeble and sick who pose no threat to the public."
The corrections department estimates that paroling all nonviolent offenders 55 or older, sick or not, would trim the prison population by about 1,000 and save about $20 million annually.
"We are paying the most amount of money to incarcerate those people who are the least risk to public safety," said Heidi Strupp, an advocate with the San Francisco-based group Legal Services for Prisoners with Children.
Juvenile facility conversion
A proposal by state Senate Democrats would use existing compassionate-release laws to free more ailing inmates. Caring for a severely disabled inmate can cost the state $1 million a year or more, said state Sen. Mike Machado, D-Linden, chairman of a subcommittee that oversees prison spending.
The proposal would limit the releases to nonviolent offenders who have not committed sex crimes or serious offenses.
The debate over how to care for ill inmates is connected to three lawsuits related to overcrowding in state prisons.
The 33 prisons house about 159,000 inmates but have a capacity of just about 100,000. An additional 11,000 inmates are in fire camps or private prisons. Plaintiffs claim the crowding has led to poor medical, mental health and disability care for inmates.
If a settlement isn't reached, a special panel of three federal judges could order a prison population cap or other steps leading to the release of thousands of inmates.
The receiver appointed to oversee prison healthcare wants the $7 billion to build medical units for roughly 6 percent of the inmate population, or about 10,000 beds.
"Given the aging population in corrections and their healthcare status, we essentially need to build long-term housing for people who need long-term care," receiver J. Clark Kelso told a state budget subcommittee this spring.
Kelso has proposed shutting down the Ventura Youth Correctional Facility on Wright Road in Camarillo and replacing it with a hospital for 1,500 adult inmates with physical and psychological problems.
Some actions to deal with aging prisoners are being considered independent of any court orders.
California corrections officials are turning the surplus El Paso de Robles juvenile correctional facility in San Luis Obispo County into a low-security prison for 1,000 nonviolent men older than 50.
The conversion is starting this month.
Other attempts to ease the strain on older inmates are under way in the Legislature, but some of the steps could add to the already high cost of incarceration.
'Prison nursing homes'
A bill by Sen. Sheila Kuehl, D-Santa Monica, would grant privileges such as easier work and bunk assignments to inmates older than 55. They also would get first call for meals and would not be required to drop to the floor during security alarms.
Prison employees would be trained to deal with inmates who may no longer be able to hear commands or might act out because of dementia. Older inmates would receive identification cards and ombudsmen to help with their complaints.
The bill stalled in the Senate Appropriations Committee, leaving its fate uncertain because Kuehl is termed out of the Legislature after this year.
Ultimately, the answer may be supervised release programs for most elderly inmates and minimum-security "prison nursing homes" with specially trained staffs for the most frail, said Jonathan Turley, founder and director of the Project for Older Prisoners, an advocacy group.
Federal studies show that less than 5 percent of inmates 55 and older are likely to commit new crimes after their release. By comparison, about 70 percent of California inmates overall return to prison.





Posted by THX1138 on July 6, 2008 at 11:05 a.m. (Suggest removal)
If the feeble are released, who's going to care for them? Sure some may have family that will pick up the bill, but a fair amount will transition over to county programs. Once again they're covered by the taxpayers.
Isn't it ironic how many of the poor in this country go without basic healthcare, yet inmates/criminals get it free..[?!]
The 3-strikes law really needs to be re-thought...
Posted by YapYap on July 8, 2008 at 1:40 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Prisoners have to pay for the health care they receive, just like anyone else. They're not better off in prison because the prisons are severely overcrowded and the medical staff is seriously understaffed and incapable to properly treat all the inmates that require treatment.
It's high time to fix the seriously flawed (not to mention corrupt) Parole Board so that we can start paroling and granting compassionate releases to those who deserve it instead of just locking everyone up indefinitely while the costs spiral out of control. We simply can't afford the current way the CDCR and Parole Board operate, folks. Let's face the facts and get realistic.
Besides, the current living conditions of the California inmate population violates both the US Constitution and the international human rights treaties the US signed and must honor. It's downright outrageous and something needs to be done about this NOW!
Posted by ironwoman on July 8, 2008 at 7:51 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I wonder what crimes these aging inmates committed. I wonder who their vicitims are and if they received constitutional care before they were victimized. I wonder how many law-abiding elderly people right now are in the hospital dying and don't have any health insurance.
Let's weigh this out...take care of law-abiding citizens first or convicted felons?
And no YAP YAP, prisoners do not pay for their medical care...TAXPAYERS do.
(Requires free registration.)
Article discussions on this site are to support community debates of issues related to our stories and editorials.
Discussions should not stray from the subject of the story or editorial.
We do not allow the following:
We reserve the right to delete threads and/or ban users for these or other reasons we deem necessary.
Opinions are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.