Weather | Beachcam
Login | Contact Us | Staff | Site Map | Archives | Alerts | Electronic Edition | Subscribe to the paper

HomeOpinionOpinion

Ground Zero debacle demands a private developer

In olden days, Americans needed just 13 and a half months to erect the Empire State Building, four and a half years to build Hoover Dam, and six years, four months to install the Transcontinental Railroad.

Yet, this Independence Day, six years, nine months, and three weeks have elapsed since Sept. 11, 2001, and Ground Zero remains an 80-foot-deep embarrassment for the United States.

The government functionaries who fathered this fiasco should yield and assign private developer Larry Silverstein to arrange what already should have occurred: the Twin Towers' return to America's skyline.

The lethargy at Ground Zero became painfully clear in Tuesday's report on the 16-acre site where al-Qaida murdered 2,750 innocents:

— Overall construction costs and schedules cannot be determined due to 15 pending "essential decisions." Until then, "we are not going to set new dates until we know exactly where this project stands," said the report's author, executive director Chris Ward of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, the agency that controls the site.

— Signature elements such as the Freedom Tower and September 11 memorial will be incomplete 10 years after the attacks.

— Reported cost overruns are at least $1.23 billion, and rising rapidly.

Right across from this shambles, real-estate magnate Larry Silverstein produced 7 World Trade Center, an elegant, 52-story high-rise that glistens by day and glows by night. Opened just four years and eight months after 9/11, it is this spot's only sign of hope.

The difference? Silverstein manages this project with limited government interference. Conversely, 19 bureaucracies — from Manhattan to Albany to Trenton to Washington — wrestle him at Ground Zero.

"For years, every public official yelled and screamed that no private developer should or could build on sacred ground' — that the Port Authority could do it more quickly and cheaply. Well, look how that turned out," a Manhattan real-estate executive close to the Ground Zero saga told me.

Silverstein signed a 99-year lease on the WTC just seven weeks before Islamofascists demolished it. Nevertheless, politicians and pen pushers boss him around. So, they should make him this deal:

— You bought it. You build it. You earn the rent from your tenants. We collect property taxes from you and commercial and sales taxes from them.

— If you beat a mutually agreeable deadline, we pay you a bonus that increases the sooner you finish. Miss it, and you pay a penalty that grows the longer you delay.

— Finally, restore the Twin Towers. Public enthusiasm for this effort will propel its completion. And it's the right thing to do.

Such blueprints already exist. Twin Towers II — proposed by structural designer Kenneth Gardner and the late Herbert Belton, an original WTC architect — mirrors the sorely missed high rises. Its buildings comprise a 300-room hotel, 800 condominiums, 2 million square feet of retail, and 8 million square feet of offices. These 1,450-foot, safety-enhanced structures fit around the Freedom Towers' foundation and feature 121 floors — 11 more than in their 1,360-foot predecessors. (Visit http;//www.wtc2011.com.)

The gaping chasm that is Ground Zero screams national paralysis. Nothing more convincingly would signal to friends and foes alike the defiance of our Founding Fathers than to see the Twin Towers back where they belong — taller, stronger and prouder than ever.

— Deroy Murdock writes for Scripps Howard News Service.

Discussions

Posted by hemlock1262 on July 4, 2008 at 5:30 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Excellent idea, Deroy. Nothing like turning places of national significance over to your capitalist friends. While we're at it, let's give the Grand Canyon to someone with the vision to fill it in and pave it for parking.

And Mount Rushmore, too -- by golly, we could chisel in a blank face, and lease the area to those who want themselves holographically projected onto it!

And the Golden Gate Bridge -- we could wrap it in that advertising stuff you see on cars!

And the White House! What the heck are we doing with all that vacant space? Billboards, baby! What more competitive location for a fine, upstanding American capitalist to promote his goods than in front of the White House? I mean, it's not like you can look in there or anything. Just wasted real estate, gosh darn it.

And Gettysburg! Why is all that prime Pennsylvania real estate being left vacant? Gettysburg Estates! Emancipation Condos! Shop at the Blue and the Gray Mall! Yee-haw!

And hey Deroy -- good job not mentioning the fact that it is Silverstein who rejected the plan to rebuild the WTC.



Discuss this article
(Requires free registration.)

Article discussions on this site are to support community debates of issues related to our stories and editorials.

Discussions should not stray from the subject of the story or editorial.

We do not allow the following:

  • Posts that degrade others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation or disability.
  • Disparaging remarks, abusive language or obscene comments.
  • Threats, whether obvious or veiled.

We reserve the right to delete threads and/or ban users for these or other reasons we deem necessary.

Opinions are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Username:

Password:
(Forgotten your password?)

Your Turn:

Loading videos... If you don't see them shortly, you may need to download the Flash Player.