Weather | Beachcam
Login | Contact Us | Staff | Site Map | Archives | Alerts | Electronic Edition | Subscribe to the paper

HomeOpinionOpinion

REAL ID too expensive

Michael Chertoff, secretary of homeland security, has been busy trying to sell the virtues of the REAL ID Act of 2005 to the American people. A REAL ID-compliant driver's license is promoted as the ultimate proof of your identity. All you need to do to get one is to prove who you are. Sounds a little circular, doesn't it?

The gold standard for such proof has long been a birth certificate, on which driver's licenses and passports are based. What proof of identity is needed to get a birth certificate? Swear you are who you say you are. The security of REAL ID seems to be based on Homeland Security's confidence that terrorists won't lie.

In California, birth records are available on the Internet for every California birth from 1905 to 2000. These records provide the information needed to apply for an authorized certified copy of an individual's birth certificate, provided you claim to be that individual or a parent, child, grandparent, grandchild, sibling, spouse or domestic partner of that individual. In Ventura County, a birth certificate can be obtained from the County Recorder for less than $15 in person, via mail or via the Internet.

Chertoff claims a REAL ID driver's license, valid for four years, will cost about $8. For this sum, the DMV is required to take your photograph and compare it to two large national databases of photographs to ensure you have neither been rejected for a REAL ID card nor already been issued one elsewhere; to verify that the birth certificate and other documentation you provide is valid, presumably by contacting the appropriate county recorder; and provide you with a plastic card with an imbedded radio-frequency identification chip.

Presumably this $8 does not include county costs to verify a birth certificate for every U.S. citizen who wishes a driver's license or identity card. Any genealogist can confirm that many counties do not have digital records, requiring a manual search for birth records.

REAL ID may protect your identity from being used by others to board an aircraft or enter a federal building, but it will do little to protect your credit rating from thieves. To the contrary, the embedded RFID chip will contain identifying information of use to thieves who need only pass within a few feet of you with a relatively inexpensive RFID reader.

Although the goals of REAL ID have merit, providing the desired level of security will require a more serious effort involving biometrics and probably DNA. REAL ID is far too expensive for what it provides, and it assumes a federal authority to spend state and county budgets.

— Nick Fotheringham lives in Thousand Oaks.

Discussions

Posted by shaver_one on January 21, 2008 at 11:16 a.m. (Suggest removal)

An imbedded RFID chip...
Sounds like Big Brother, to me.
Next, they'll be suggesting that every new born be implanted with a RFID chip.
No thanks. I'll walk.

Posted by guinzuz on January 30, 2008 at 6:41 a.m. (Suggest removal)

You need to check your facts...RFID chips were explicitly rejected in the DHS Real ID final rulemaking and was never even proposed back in March 2006 in the notice of proposed rulemaking.

If you're going to publish an opinion about a regulation, perhaps you should first actually READ the regulation!

Posted by nick2fot on February 13, 2008 at 3:56 p.m. (Suggest removal)

The final rule, published in the Federal Register on Jan. 29 (Vol. 73, No. 19), does not prohibit RFID chips as a means of meeting the requirement for ISO/IEC 15438:2006(E) technology. It simply allows other options, such as the PDF417 bar code, which presents its own set of security concerns. Since the rule is to take effect May 11, RFID will likely still be a "common, machine-readable technology" at that time.

Posted by guinzuz on February 23, 2008 at 5:10 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Actually the final Regulations call for the PD417 bar code as the required "machine-readable technology". States are free to use other technologies such as RFID if they choose. 46 States already use the PF417 bar code. This is not exactly a shocking requirement.



Discuss this article
(Requires free registration.)

Article discussions on this site are to support community debates of issues related to our stories and editorials.

Discussions should not stray from the subject of the story or editorial.

We do not allow the following:

  • Posts that degrade others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation or disability.
  • Disparaging remarks, abusive language or obscene comments.
  • Threats, whether obvious or veiled.

We reserve the right to delete threads and/or ban users for these or other reasons we deem necessary.

Opinions are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Username:

Password:
(Forgotten your password?)

Your Turn:

Loading videos... If you don't see them shortly, you may need to download the Flash Player.