Weather | Beachcam
Login | Contact Us | Staff | Site Map | Archives | Alerts | Electronic Edition | Subscribe to the paper

HomeNewsCounty News

New '08 laws address kids, bicyclists, race jockeys

Cell phone use, cigarette sales, 'oldies' concerts are other topics


Download Podcast  Download this story as a podcast!

Blog



Timm Herdt blogs on politics and Ventura County in a presidential election year.
Read it now »

SACRAMENTO — As the new year begins in California and most of the 750 new laws enacted in 2007 take effect, there's good news for kids, pets, horse-racing jockeys and fans of old-fashioned rock 'n' roll.

For driving scofflaws, bicyclists without lights and retailers who have been lax about checking IDs of those who buy cigarettes, things change for the worse beginning today.

Minimum-wage workers also benefit today as the second phase of a 2006 law kicks in, lifting their pay to $8 an hour from $7.25.

And for everyone who has a cell phone and a driver's license, the countdown begins toward two significant laws that will kick in on July 1 — a ban on the use of cell phones while driving by those under 18, and a requirement that adults who talk on the phone while driving use hands-free phone equipment.

Here's a rundown of some of the laws that took effect at midnight:

Smoke-free cars: SB7 by Sen. Jenny Oropeza, D-Long Beach, makes it illegal to smoke in a car if there is a child inside. A violation is punishable by a fine of up to $100 for what is categorized as a secondary offense, which means an officer may not pull over a vehicle for the sole purpose of citing someone for violating this law.

A citation can be issued only if someone is pulled over for some other reason and found to have been smoking with a child present.

Advocates, including the American Lung Association, say the concentration of secondhand smoke inside a car can be 10 times greater than the level the Environmental Protection Agency considers hazardous to human health.

Pet protective orders: SB 353 by Sen. Sheila Kuehl, D-Santa Monica, allows a judge to include in a protective order issued in a domestic violence case the right of one party to retain possession of a pet and to forbid the other party to come near the animal.

Raises for jockeys: These diminutive athletes make most of their money when they collect a share of the prize money when their mounts finish first, second or third. But in races where their mounts finish out of the top three, they receive a minimum of just $33. AB649 by Assemblywoman Fiona Ma, D-San Francisco, raises that minimum by $10.

Truth in music: AB 702 by Assemblyman Anthony Portantino, D-Pasadena, prohibits performers from staging "oldies" concerts and billing themselves as the group that originally recorded the tunes unless at least one of the performers was a member of the group and has a legal right to use the group's name. Otherwise, the concert must be promoted as a "salute" or "tribute" to the original recording artists.

Traffic violators: Judges can no longer allow those convicted of very serious driving offenses, such as reckless driving and fleeing the scene of a traffic accident, to have those violations expunged from their records by attending traffic school. AB645 by Assemblyman Mike Feuer, D-Los Angeles, would require that those violations stay on the driver's record, which would result in having to pay higher insurance rates and also put them at risk for having their driver's licenses suspended if they commit future traffic infractions.

Illuminated bicyclists: AB478 by Assemblywoman Lois Wolk, D-Davis, requires bicyclists riding after dark on sidewalks in cities where bikes are permitted there to have functioning lights and reflectors. A previous law already required lights and reflectors for bicycles operating on streets after dark. The new law also allows bicyclists to wear reflectors on their shoes or ankles in lieu of having reflectors on the pedals.

Cigarette sales: Local police departments and other law enforcement agencies are now permitted to enforce laws against selling cigarettes to minors, a responsibility that was previously the exclusive purview of the state Department of Public Health. SB624 by Sen. Gil Cedillo, D-Los Angeles, also doubles the fines for a first violation, to between $400 and $600.

Domestic partners: AB 102 by Ma allows one or both partners, at the time of obtaining a registered domestic partnership or marriage license, to legally change their names by completing a form on the document. They may choose the last name of one of the partners, a name that combines their two last names or a hyphenated name.

Phthalates: AB 1108 by Ma prohibits the use of phthalates, a chemical used to give added flexibility to plastics, in toys or other products designed for use by children 3 years old or younger.

Certificate of still birth: SB 850, by Sen. Abel Maldonado, R-Santa Maria, and Lou Correa, D-Santa Ana, requires county registrars to provide a certificate of still birth to parents who have lost a fetus beyond the 20th week of gestation.

Gift cards: SB 250 by Sen. Ellen Corbett, D-Santa Rosa, allows consumers to redeem for cash gift cards with less than $10 value remaining.

Kangaroo parts: SB 880 by Sen. Ron Calderon, D-Montebello, repeals an existing state prohibition on the importation into California of products containing kangaroo parts.

High school exam: AB 347 by Assemblyman Pedro Nava, D-Santa Barbara, requires school districts to provide up to two years of additional instruction to any 12th-grader who has not yet passed the high school exit exam. The law implements an agreement that was part of the settlement of a lawsuit filed against the state.

Discussions

Posted by rangr_rick on January 1, 2008 at 1:15 a.m. (Suggest removal)

It appears that these "very important" laws were passed by lawmakers with a "D" following their names.

Posted by Nosmo_King on January 1, 2008 at 8:15 a.m. (Suggest removal)

How long does it take to ride a horse around a racetrack?

Posted by Face on January 1, 2008 at 8:59 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Now 60% of our students will be hanging be hanging around high school for another 2 years? Do you really want 16 yo Sussie hanging around with a shaving 21 yo man.. legally at school?

Posted by imp9824 on January 1, 2008 at 9:33 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Face99- Where are you getting your numbers? You are claiming that 60% of students do not pass the high school exit exam; this is completely false. The schools in the Conejo Valley have more than a 96% pass rate at the end of their 12th grade year. Additionally, according to the CDE website, over 80% of county 10th graders passed the CAHSEE on their first attempt.

Plus, schools would have to offer the additional instruction, students would not be required to attend. Besides, how many of the students not able to pass the Exit Exam really want to stick around for up to two additional years?

Anyone wishing to view the real data can view it here: http://cahsee.cde.ca.gov/

Posted by AnnaWhaat on January 1, 2008 at 4:53 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Face99 ,My guess, And I am assumming that those that have enough credits to graduate will not be attending school full time for an extra two years. They may enroll in homeschool, but they will be given more chances to take the exit exam. AND of course the state will probably be recieving more money with more enrollments.
Happy New Year everyone ! I hope its a great year for everyone!!!!!

Posted by smithjc on January 1, 2008 at 8:22 p.m. (Suggest removal)

i really love the bicycle one. the law mandating lights and reflectors has been on the books since i was a child (and that's longer ago than i care to think about or mention). for them to add sidewalks is redundant, as sidewalks, by definition are a portion of the highway (sec 555 cvc), and the previous law requires bicycles ridden on the highways to be equipped with certain things, including lights and reflectors.

it's nice to know that the legislature has nothing better to do than pass the same laws again. although, i guess it's better than those whack jobs creating new stuff.

Posted by VoiceOf_Reason on January 2, 2008 at 10:56 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Why not implement exit exams (promotionary exams) from Grammar School to Middle School, and then again from Middle School to High School? Isn't waiting until the end of the 12th grade to see if our children are educated a little too late? Seems a bit bassackwards to me. How are these children advancing from grade to grade and then by the 12th grade misteriously not able to pass the exam?



Discuss this article
(Requires free registration.)

Article discussions on this site are to support community debates of issues related to our stories and editorials.

Discussions should not stray from the subject of the story or editorial.

We do not allow the following:

  • Posts that degrade others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation or disability.
  • Disparaging remarks, abusive language or obscene comments.
  • Threats, whether obvious or veiled.

We reserve the right to delete threads and/or ban users for these or other reasons we deem necessary.

Opinions are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Username:

Password:
(Forgotten your password?)

Your Turn:

Loading videos... If you don't see them shortly, you may need to download the Flash Player.