Home › News › Other News
The Star cuts seven jobs
The Ventura County Star cut seven jobs today, marking the first time the company has laid off employees as it struggles with a difficult economy and shrinking ad revenue.
The newspaper cut two positions in operations and production, four in circulation and one clerical position in accounting.
Publisher George H. Cogswell III said the paper's senior management team has spent the past five months looking at any opportunities to reduce costs without taking away from The Star's newsroom and advertising staffs. The team looked for positions that could be eliminated through new technology or operating differently. The company this year budgeted for the equivalent of about 350 positions.
"This is a painstakingly detailed, heartstring-pulling process. We do not take it lightly," Cogswell said. "It is a course of action we would never hope to go down. Laying folks off ... is a very difficult business decision."
Affected employees were notified on Friday and Monday. Cogswell sent a note about the layoffs to all employees Monday afternoon.
The seven workers, who were not identified because of privacy issues, will receive a severance package that provides compensation based on length of employment and medical benefits for three months. The average time the employees worked for the company was less than five years. The individuals worked out with their managers whether they would finish out this week.
Most of the newspaper industry has been struggling with shrinking advertising revenue. Print advertising in the third quarter was down 9 percent from the year before, according to the Newspaper Association of America. Classified advertising was down 17 percent from the previous year.
E.W. Scripps Co., parent company of The Star, is in the process of splitting its operations into two companies — one that handles newspapers and broadcast television stations, and one that handles the company's online ventures and cable television franchises such as HGTV and Food Network.
According to preliminary fourth quarter results, Scripps estimated that total newspaper revenue was down 9.6 percent to $165 million. Advertising revenue at newspapers managed solely by the company — those not in joint-operating agreements — was down 12 percent from a year ago at $131 million.
Scripps' stock rose 40 cents Monday to close at $42.71.
"There's been a trickle-down effect from a pretty devastating real estate market," Cogswell said. It has affected several areas of advertising, with real estate, jobs and automotive listings hit the hardest.
Cogswell said advertising at The Star was down about 15 percent when comparing 2007 to 2006.
"I don't think we've seen the bottom yet," Cogswell said. "We need to prepare ourselves. Things could get worse before they get better."
Even with a small number of cuts, it is a painful process, particularly for papers that have had a long tradition of rewarding people for years of service, said Rick Edmonds, media business analyst with The Poynter Institute.
Papers are taking many different approaches to savings these days.
"The cost-cutting climate is so urgent, many things are being looked at," he said.
He said some papers have outsourced some functions either to another company across town or a call center in another country. Some have outsourced ad production work, others have outsourced their printing.
Edmonds noted it becomes a balance of cutting costs and still putting out a paper people want to read.
"There's some sense it's potentially dangerous to go too far with newsroom cuts," he said. And there's a similar incentive to protect advertising sales.
That doesn't mean that all papers are avoiding such cuts.
Last week, Tribune Co., now owned by billionare Sam Zell, announced it plans to cut about 400 to 500 jobs across the organization, including some newsroom jobs. The New York Times also announced last week it was cutting about 100 newsroom jobs.
At The Star, the first cost cuts that directly affected personnel were voluntary buyouts offered in April to 22 employees in various departments. Nine employees took the buyouts. The paper also outsourced its print advertising design department.
"There are no plans to further reduce the work force as it relates to our core product," Cogswell said.
He said the paper is creating target market opportunities with niche publications in print and online that will start to launch in the coming months and bring in new revenue. He wants to return the paper to a growing business and eventually adding jobs.




Posted by Equitable_Enforcer on February 18, 2008 at 6:06 p.m. (Suggest removal)
These are our friends and neighbors. Working in a newspaper is demanding and time sensitive, regardless of the job. I wish all of those who were laid off fair winds and trailing seas.
Posted by SF1943 on February 18, 2008 at 6:48 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Hopefully, the ones that have been axed are the ones that come up with your absolutely, absurd left wing editorals!
Posted by EagleEye on February 18, 2008 at 8:53 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Every time the Star Editorial Board sides with marijuana dealers, 14-year old hate motivated killers and liberal judges, it sticks a thumb in the eye of the conservative residents of this county. Wake up Star. You need more balance in your Editorial Board.
Posted by wdwinder on February 18, 2008 at 9:58 p.m. (Suggest removal)
God, lets hope they aren't the proofreaders.
Posted by uknow1 on February 18, 2008 at 10:34 p.m. (Suggest removal)
My two cents is that all of the religious "news" is actually causing a loss of readers. Sunday's "Arts & Living" front page was all christan religious based. I guess other posters are referring to a recent editorial that supported medicinal marijuana, the law (Prop 215) that the majority of voters passed in 1996. I support the law and religious diversity. Ventura proper is a small part of the Star's readership base. One should check out the various ethnicities in T.O. to see how limited of an appeal the Star has to non-christans and non-white people.
Posted by B8R_N4MD on February 18, 2008 at 10:44 p.m. (Suggest removal)
The Star also has lost one of its veteran reporters to retirement, Charles Levin. Even though some of his articles may have been controversial, they always seemed to be fair, unbiased and well written. It will take alot to fill his shoes.
Maybe if the Star didn't try to be a tabloid and just reported facts the readership would increase.
(Requires free registration.)
Article discussions on this site are to support community debates of issues related to our stories and editorials.
Discussions should not stray from the subject of the story or editorial.
We do not allow the following:
We reserve the right to delete threads and/or ban users for these or other reasons we deem necessary.
Opinions are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.