Weather | Beachcam
Login | Contact Us | Staff | Site Map | Archives | Alerts | Electronic Edition | Subscribe to the paper

HomeNewsCamarillo

Camarillo council OKs property rezoning

Move brings city closer to redevelopment plans

The Camarillo City Council voted unanimously Wednesday night to approve a zoning change for a 45-acre swath of centrally located property within the city, which will allow property owners and developers to implement a city-initiated redevelopment strategy for the area.

The rezoning move brings the city one step closer to what officials call a "mixed-use village concept" known as the Camarillo Commons Strategic Plan.

The plan was adopted by the council last year.

Officials said the zoning change — from commercial planned development to mixed use — is part of a comprehensive redevelopment planning effort that would include a blend of commercial and residential land uses, plazas and green spaces, and interconnecting walkways that are pedestrian-friendly.

The rezoned property is referred to as the Commons. Until Wednesday night, it was zoned for commercial use only.

The vote was 4 to 0, with Mayor Charlotte Craven excusing herself from council discussion and from voting because of a "financial conflict of interest."

Craven said she and her husband own property adjacent to the proposed mixed-use area and that it was inappropriate for her to be present when the rezoning issue was addressed.

City officials describe the property as being south of Ponderosa Drive, east of Mobil Avenue, west of Arneill Road, and north of Daily Drive and the Raemere Street residential neighborhood.

The area contains commercial buildings, offices, a church, a post office, a fire station and two of the city's oldest shopping centers.

When the area is fully redeveloped, something officials said would likely take several years, it will contain a mixture of businesses, retail stores, offices and residential housing.

New development would have to be at least two stories in height, with residential units permitted above the first floor.

The area would have architectural and streetscape design elements that would visually link it to Old Town, according to city officials.

The council also unanimously approved an environmental impact report that studied potential effects related to the zoning change and the Commons development.

Prepared by the city's community development department, the report said there would be no significant impact on noise, traffic or air quality.

Before the votes were cast, Gail Beltramo and Carl Cashin, who own separate properties within the designated Commons area, expressed unease about the zoning change.

"I'm not convinced that mixed-use development would be good for the area," said Cashin. He told the council he had concerns about potential traffic congestion and the possibility of unoccupied retail space.

"I'm concerned about the whole plan. And the environmental impact report is too technical," said Beltramo, a Camarillo resident for 45 years. Beltramo said she's also worried about the effect the zoning change would have on tenants.

Before gaining city approval, officials said, the Commons redevelopment plan was extensively studied, and included an economic and market analysis, a traffic study and public outreach meetings.

"Without a buy-in from property owners, this project will go nowhere," said Councilman Kevin Kildee.

He asked Cashin and Beltramo to keep an open mind about the possibilities the redevelopment plan would offer them and the city.

"We don't want an adversarial relationship. We want to make it a great area," said Councilwoman Jan McDonald.

Discussions

Posted by frank14 on February 15, 2008 at 6:05 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Great news. The old Ponderosa Shopping Center needs a remake.

Posted by igo2sara on February 28, 2008 at 7:26 p.m. (Suggest removal)

It could use an upgrade, I'll admit, but there are ways to update other then a complete tear down. The plan to move the Fire Station, Bowling Alley, and EVERYTHING ELSE, seems extreem. I hate the idea of crowded stores packed with apartments above them. I also hate the idea of a huge construction of a parking concrete structure in the middle of this mess. I love how they upgraded the Albertson's center. Most stores were able to stay where they were during construction. Old Town has been upgraded without sending store owners packing also. I feel bad for the store owners and property owners who would be forced to move. We will be losing some long-owned stores in the area, and trading our beutiful S P A C E, and convenient parking for a traffic jam. They plan on crowding the store/apts. as condensed. I'm not looking foward to it.



Discuss this article
(Requires free registration.)

Article discussions on this site are to support community debates of issues related to our stories and editorials.

Discussions should not stray from the subject of the story or editorial.

We do not allow the following:

  • Posts that degrade others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation or disability.
  • Disparaging remarks, abusive language or obscene comments.
  • Threats, whether obvious or veiled.

We reserve the right to delete threads and/or ban users for these or other reasons we deem necessary.

Opinions are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Username:

Password:
(Forgotten your password?)

Your Turn:

Loading videos... If you don't see them shortly, you may need to download the Flash Player.