Weather | Beachcam
Login | Contact Us | Staff | Site Map | Archives | Alerts | Electronic Edition | Subscribe to the paper

HomeBreaking News

Camarillo rezones 45-acres for redevelopment

Correspondent

The Camarillo City Council voted unanimously Wednesday night to approve a zoning change for a 45-acre swath of centrally-located property within the city, which will allow property owners and developers to eventually implement a city-initiated, redevelopment strategy for the designated area.

The rezoning move brings the city one step closer to creating what officials call a "mixed-use village concept," known as the Camarillo Commons Strategic Plan, and adopted by the council last year.

Officials said the zoning change — from commercial planned development to mixed use — is part of a comprehensive redevelopment planning effort that would include a blend of commercial and residential land uses, plazas and green spaces, and interconnecting walkways that are pedestrian-friendly.

The rezoned property is referred to as the Commons. Until Wednesday night, it was zoned for commercial use only.

The vote was 4 0, with mayor and councilmember, Charlotte Craven, excusing herself from council discussion and from voting because of a "financial conflict of interest." Craven said that she and her husband own property adjacent to the proposed Commons mixed-use area, and that it was inappropriate for her to be present when the rezoning issue was addressed.

City officials describe the property as being south of Ponderosa Drive, east of Mobil Avenue, west of Arneill Road, and north of Daily Drive and the Raemere Street residential neighborhood. Currently, the area contains commercial buildings, offices, a church, a post office, a fire station and two of the city's oldest shopping centers.

When the area is redeveloped, something that officials said would take years to materialize, it would contain a mixture of businesses, retail stores, offices and residential housing. New development would have to be at least two-stories in height, with residential uses permitted above the first floor. Officials said the Commons would have architectural and streetscape design elements that would visually link it to Old Town.

The council also unanimously approved an environmental impact report that studied potential impacts related to the zoning change and the Commons development. Prepared by the city's community development department, the report said there would be minimal impact on noise, traffic and air quality.

Discussions

Posted by guerodrex on February 14, 2008 at 10:29 a.m. (Suggest removal)

mm-this will hardly turn into LA urban sprawl. This area is currently a wasteland of under maintained businesses. This will revitalize central Camarillo.

Posted by hotwildflower on February 14, 2008 at 11:30 a.m. (Suggest removal)

STOP BUILDING!!!

Posted by heregoes on February 14, 2008 at 2:36 p.m. (Suggest removal)

That is not new building, it is re-building. As far as my memory goes, they are not touching any "open" areas.

Also, it should bring construction jobs to the area for some time and make an under-maintained area much nicer.

Posted by Cat on February 14, 2008 at 2:57 p.m. (Suggest removal)

This'll be good because that area is looking dated and run-down. It'll be nice just as the newly-redesigned Ventura in Old Town is.

Posted by cowchip on February 14, 2008 at 6:18 p.m. (Suggest removal)

This will be a good turn for Camarillo. This particular area of town could definitely use a face lift. This is a wonderful place to live and we need to update the look of this area to keep up with the nice feel of the community. I just hope the planners will incorporate a way to preserve the fabulous trees that live there.

Posted by del on February 14, 2008 at 9:10 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Yes cowchip,

Hopefully, they will not cut the good trees down then plant worthless, ugly, good-for-nothing palm trees like they have here in Santa Paula.



Discuss this article
(Requires free registration.)

Article discussions on this site are to support community debates of issues related to our stories and editorials.

Discussions should not stray from the subject of the story or editorial.

We do not allow the following:

  • Posts that degrade others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation or disability.
  • Disparaging remarks, abusive language or obscene comments.
  • Threats, whether obvious or veiled.

We reserve the right to delete threads and/or ban users for these or other reasons we deem necessary.

Opinions are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Username:

Password:
(Forgotten your password?)

Your Turn:

Loading videos... If you don't see them shortly, you may need to download the Flash Player.