Weather | Beachcam
Login | Contact Us | Staff | Site Map | Archives | Alerts | Electronic Edition | Subscribe to the paper

HomeBusinessBusiness

Lenders tout foreclosure rescue plan

Local economists argue a 30-day freeze will only stall the process

Project Lifeline

Participating lenders: Bank of America, Chase, Citigroup, Countrywide Financial Corp., Washington Mutual and Wells Fargo.

Eligibility: All home loans that are 90 days delinquent and that are not in active bankruptcy, in active foreclosure with a sale date less than 30 days away, where the homeowner has indicated a desire to give up the home, an investment property or a vacant property.

Process:

• Call your mortgage lender.

• Tell your lender that you have received their letter, you wish to stay in your home and you are willing to seek counseling.

• Provide updated financial information.

• If appropriate, a pending foreclosure may be paused for up to 30 days while a review takes place and a new payment plan is created.

• If the homeowner follows the new plan for three months, the loan will be formally modified.

Source: Hope Now alliance

WASHINGTON — Six major lenders, worried about the deepening mortgage crisis, said Tuesday that they would grant a 30-day freeze on many foreclosures to consider delinquent borrowers' pleas for lower monthly payments.

Standing with bank representatives, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said Project Lifeline is needed because the 2-year-old mortgage mess is still threatening to separate many Americans from their homes.

"The worst isn't over," Paulson said. In fact, "the worst is just beginning."

Paulson, along with Housing and Urban Development Secretary Alphonso Jackson, held a news conference to call attention to the program. They urged other lenders to participate and borrowers to step up.

"If someone is willing to make a call, to reach out, (then) there's a chance they can save their home," Paulson said.

Jackson called Project Lifeline a "responsible, timely effort" to curb the foreclosures that have been unnerving financial markets and weighing down the U.S. economy.

The six lenders — Calabasas-based Countrywide Financial Corp., Bank of America Corp., Citigroup Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co., Wells Fargo & Co. and Washington Mutual Inc. — have designed the program to help any homeowner in trouble, not just subprime borrowers.

They have agreed to immediately send letters to homeowners more than 90 days delinquent on their house payments. The letter would spell out the procedures for borrowers to "pause" the foreclosure process.

The homeowner would have 10 days to respond and provide additional financial information. The lender could use that information to consider new payment options. In some cases, foreclosures would go forward, but in others, lower payments might be worked out.

The lenders could not say how many people might get new loan terms, but reported that "hundreds of thousands" of homeowners are at least 90 days delinquent in their payments.

Not everyone was optimistic.

Extending the foreclosures by a month is not going to help — it's simply going to stall the process, said Somnath Basu, professor of finance at California Lutheran University in Thousand Oaks.

"It's sort of like putting your head in the sand," he said.

Borrowers' problems are not so shallow that their troubles are going to go away in a month, he said.

When participating lenders reduce interest rates for troubled borrowers, Basu said he believes that it would penalize the lenders' depositors with higher fees.

"If they reduce the loan rate, they go out of business — it would be like suicide for them," he said.

Most likely, the lenders would be compensated through a government subsidy, which would mean another cost imposed on taxpayers, to people who did nothing wrong, Basu said.

Mary Coffin, executive vice president of loan servicing for Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, countered his assertion.

"There's no government funding whatsoever," she said during a conference call Tuesday.

Modifications possible

Although Project Lifeline is new, large servicers such as Wells Fargo are constantly looking at modifications, she said.

"This is not new monies or new programs," she said. "We always have had the capability to modify an interest rate."

Today, phones at Wells Fargo have been ringing off the hook because of inquiries about Project Lifeline, she said. Wells Fargo will launch Project Lifeline next week.

Basu said he thinks that helping those who made bad decisions is sending the wrong message about financial literacy.

"I really think we need to sort of take the shot," he said. "Let's turn around, and next time, start thinking downstream so it doesn't happen again."

The government shouldn't bail people out for making bad decisions, said Peggy Crawford, professor of finance at Pepperdine University in Malibu. But if there was some element of fraud or misunderstanding during the underwriting process, those duped borrowers should be helped, she said.

The program could buy some time for good borrowers who got into an adjustable-rate mortgages without understanding the implications of a reset, she said.

"The real question is whether subprime borrowers, even with 30 days, will be able to adjust the mortgage to the point where they'll afford them," Crawford said.

The six lenders involved in the effort account for about half of the U.S. mortgage market. They are members of the Hope Now alliance of lenders, trade groups and counselors. The group was formed last year to identify struggling borrowers and help them find ways to avoid foreclosure.

Paulson has opposed calls for a mandated, across-the-board moratorium on foreclosures. But in December, he negotiated a deal to freeze rates for five years on some subprime loans. He now wants lenders to go further by lowering loan terms for the long term, even on some mortgages not rated as subprime.

Floyd Robinson, who heads Bank of America's mortgage business, said the program relies upon borrowers stepping forward to develop workout plans.

"Homeowners can only take advantage of this program by taking action; they must respond when they hear from us," he said.

Many Democrats and public interest groups have been critical of the Bush administration for not doing more sooner to address problems tied to the subprime lending practices that flourished between 2002 and 2005.

During that time, many lenders offered mortgages to borrowers with spotty credit histories or irregular income. Typically, the loans offered low initial interest rates to hold down the monthly cost. But over time, the rates ratcheted up.

Over the past two years, millions of loans have been resetting to much higher rates, making it impossible for some homeowners to keep up. As a result, foreclosures have soared, driving down home prices as properties sit vacant. In 2007, home values fell nationwide for the first time since the Great Depression.

The Federal Reserve estimates that about 2 million more homeowners will face rising monthly payments over the next two years as their loans reset to higher interest rates.

Critics say the voluntary plans backed by the White House are too limited to have much of an effect on an enormous problem. For example, the Center for Responsible Lending in Washington says that in the third quarter of 2007, lenders initiated about 213,000 foreclosures on subprime loans, but offered meaningful loan "modifications" on only 28,000.

Efforts called inadequate

John Taylor, president of the National Community Reinvestment Coalition, dismissed the Hope Now efforts as inadequate. "Borrowers need help now, not just more hope," he said. "Almost weekly announcements about small successes and minor program modifications confirm the program is not working."

Taylor's group, composed of more than 600 community-based organizations, says it wants the federal government to purchase, at a discount, the mortgages held in securitized pools. Once the government holds the loan portfolio, it could reduce all of the loan terms "in a meaningful way to create long-term affordability," the group said.

Although Paulson endorses the voluntary efforts that the White House has been promoting, he acknowledged that the problems are profound. "None of these efforts are a silver bullet that will undo the excesses of the past years," he said.

— Star staff writer Jenni Mintz contributed to this report.

On the Net: http://hopenow.com

Discussions

Posted by SmashyCrashy on February 13, 2008 at 1:11 a.m. (Suggest removal)

This foreclosure plan is just marketing trying to get borrowers to contact their servicers so the servicers can see who can be saved and who can be foreclosed on. There is nothing new to this plan.

Posted by freethought on February 13, 2008 at 6:47 a.m. (Suggest removal)

"Extending the foreclosures by a month is not going to help — it's simply going to stall the process, said Somnath Basu, professor of finance at California Lutheran University in Thousand Oaks."

Precisely!

Posted by vspagnuolo on February 13, 2008 at 8:44 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Wow Smashy Crashy perfect name.
I have been reading your posts over the last few months on the real estate situation and it is clear that with your negative posts and doomsday preditions you don't own any real estate , typical !

Posted by tsu.lee on February 13, 2008 at 9:09 a.m. (Suggest removal)

I find it funny that the Professors that study Econ. say it is a bad idea but the people that control the money think this is a great thing.

IF a person got a mortgage at the high (near 700K) the median family would need an APR of near 0% to afford the payments.
30year loan no interest 700K - $1944.45/monthly
30year loan no interest 600K - $1666.67/monthly
30year loan no interest 500K - $1388.89/monthly
So what are they going to do cut the rate to market and add to the principal every month? Are they going to "FORGIVE" a few hundred K so they can afford their albatross?

Posted by tsu.lee on February 13, 2008 at 9:56 a.m. (Suggest removal)

oh just for comparison
freddie mac has the average 30year fixed for Jan 07 at 5.76%
http://www.freddiemac.com/pmms/pmms30...

according to Bank Rate your monthly would be
700K - $4089.46
600K - $3505.25
500K - $2921.04
400K - $2336.83
300K - $1752.62
The median family that bought a single family home near the high would need their loan cut in half to be able to afford the loan with interest.

Posted by tsu.lee on February 13, 2008 at 10:56 a.m. (Suggest removal)

ooppss that should read
freddie mac has the average 30year fixed for Jan 08 at 5.76%
Jan 07 was 6.22%

Posted by windeecity on February 13, 2008 at 1:26 p.m. (Suggest removal)

My husband and I worked very hard to stay afloat in 2007. We had made several attempts to contact Countrywide & HSBC last spring but since we were not late yet they did not even return our calls. We were trying to be proactive and get a jump start on what we knew was the inevitable. Our second mortgage went out of control (14%) but we made every effort to stay current and we did. We tapped out our savings to keep current and that was a mistake!

So now they are coming forward is what I am hearing? This is almost laughable! It's a bit late now and so ironic. But I was laid off in September and we went from BAD to WORSE and now 5 months behind.

We just received the Notice of Default from Countrywide last week. It’s just too late that and a shame no one could have contacted us last Spring when we cried out for help.

And to make matters worse…we started to look for rent and the Property Managements are tacking on an additional 500-1000.00 on security deposits because of our credit report. Ugh! So after paying a 3800.00 mortgage they are worried we can’t pay 1800.00?
Oh Give Me A Break Already!

Posted by Fred on February 13, 2008 at 6:24 p.m. (Suggest removal)

tsu.lee
Thanks, that info is really helpful and provides important detail to understanding how severe the correction must be in order to afford a house (I would guess 25-30% decrease from currently levels is about right)

windeecity,
I am not sure what your post means? 30 days would have done exactly what for you except keep you in misery another 30 days, you have saved 5 months rent by not paying your mortgage. The extra 500-1000 does not seem unreasonable as you have recently walked away from a large financial responsibility. You need to be given a break from what ??? (seems like you have gotten a lot of breaks recently)

Fred

Posted by windeecity on February 14, 2008 at 11:14 a.m. (Suggest removal)

My post was explaining the fact that these lenders would not even consider talking to us PRIOR to this mess.
I agree with your "except keep you in misery another 30 days" comment, but the facts with our situation is that we really did try and now being treated like we are some sort of rejects. The lifeline program is some sort of diverted tactic so people won't think these lenders are not such scoundrels.



Discuss this article
(Requires free registration.)

Article discussions on this site are to support community debates of issues related to our stories and editorials.

Discussions should not stray from the subject of the story or editorial.

We do not allow the following:

  • Posts that degrade others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation or disability.
  • Disparaging remarks, abusive language or obscene comments.
  • Threats, whether obvious or veiled.

We reserve the right to delete threads and/or ban users for these or other reasons we deem necessary.

Opinions are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Username:

Password:
(Forgotten your password?)

Your Turn:

Loading videos... If you don't see them shortly, you may need to download the Flash Player.