Home › Opinion › Opinion
Editorial: Slam door on 'terror' prison
Guantanamo harms U.S. image
If Defense Secretary Robert Gates is any guide, it appears closing the prison camp at Guantanamo Bay will indeed be one of Barack Obama's first priorities when he becomes president next month.
Thursday, Mr. Gates ordered his aides to quickly begin updating plans for closing the controversial prison located on the southeastern tip of Cuba.
"He has asked his team for a proposal on how to shut it down, what will be required specifically to close it and move the detainees from that facility, and at the same time protect the American people from dangerous terrorists," said Geoff Morrell, the Pentagon press secretary
Count The Star as among those favoring the immediate closure of this so-called "war on terror" prison. Guantanamo has been so tainted in U.S. and world opinion and so damaging to the United States' reputation that it is simply not worth keeping open any longer.
The problem is what to do with the 250 or so prisoners who remain there. Among those held there are Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the alleged operational mastermind of the 9/11 attacks, and other alleged senior leaders of al-Qaida and other extremist groups.
Those who are cleared for release should be repatriated. The rest will have to be brought to mainland prisons, as politically unpopular as that will be. Those we can try in federal courts should be. Others could face courts-martial in the military justice system as called for in the Geneva Conventions.
One hopes that those trials will show that we just didn't go around the world snatching people for no reason. How the rest of the world feels about the process to date was neatly summed up to The Associated Press by Waleed Alshahari of the Yemeni embassy in Washington:
"If the U.S. government has any evidence against them, they would try them and put them in jail. But it has been obvious that they have nothing against them. That is why they have not faced trial." After seven years, you do have to wonder.
There is a legitimate concern about disclosing in open court the identify of CIA operatives, foreign agents working on our behalf, the cooperation of foreign governments and intelligence sources and methods.
In trying to do this, the Bush administration went overboard and stripped the prisoners of so many rights, they were basically facing kangaroo courts. Surely, the Justice Department — cleaned out of the sort of political hacks who produced the torture memos — and the House and Senate Judiciary and Intelligence committees can devise protections that will balance the competing interests.
The most difficult part of closing Guantanamo will be bringing prisoners to the mainland. Proponents of keeping Guantanamo open treat the move as if we're doing the detainees some kind of favor.
After they get a look at a mainland super-max prison, they may begin agitating to go back to Guantanamo.
Posted by horsespinner on December 22, 2008 at 10:55 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Lets give the inmates ankle radio tags and let them loose in Ventura. That would be kinder don't you think. We could even give them jobs as rental inspectors
Posted by ahajost on December 22, 2008 at 12:02 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Oh come on now...give it a break! This facility is Club Med compared to the prisons in the Middle East and other third world countries. The U.S. government has gone to great lengths (greater than most of us would have gone) to ensure that they receive proper medical care, are fed well and can practice their religion. I refuse to believe that these guys have done nothing to deserve their incarceration there - our military and civilian agencies simply have too many checks and balances to mistakenly pick up and hold someone indefinitely without cause. And I'm not going to b---- about their "constitutional" rights to a speedy trial in a time of war with these zealots if there is any chance of compromising our information collection assets and techniques.
Screw those countries who are critical of Guantanamo and our methods, they didn't lose 3,000 people in September 2001 and they certainly haven't sacrificed the blood and treasure that we have to try to curtail the terrorist threat posed by radical Islamists. And shame on the Star editorial board for having such a short memory and ignorance of the threat that is still imminent.
Posted by sokol_kiev on December 22, 2008 at 12:29 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Amen, Ahajost! I couldn't agree more with your post... very well stated!
Posted by mikeb6804 on December 22, 2008 at 6:13 p.m. (Suggest removal)
ahajost is right. Put them in one of our maximum security prisons and they'll be begging for Gitmo. If there have been any injustices done like holding prisoners without a trial, they are independent of the prison itself. And for sure, Gitmo is much better than some of the hellholes these characters come from.
Posted by bombero42 on December 22, 2008 at 8:31 p.m. (Suggest removal)
So, ahajost you refuse to believe they have done nothing. Then why were the majority of the 800+ who were there originally let loose? Some after many years in confinement.
It turned out we had nothing on most of them.
Many were turned in for the rewards given over there. Turned in by rival tribes.
Article discussions on this site are to support community debates of issues related to our stories and editorials.
Discussions should not stray from the subject of the story or editorial.
We do not allow the following:
- Posts that degrade others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation or disability.
- Disparaging remarks, abusive language or obscene comments.
- Threats, whether obvious or veiled.
We reserve the right to delete threads and/or ban users for these or other reasons we deem necessary.
Opinions are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.










There are 5 comments to this article.
Comments are found beneath the Yahoo! ad below.