Weather | Beachcam
Login | Contact Us | Staff | Site Map | Archives | Alerts | Electronic Edition | Subscribe to the paper

HomeOpinionOpinion

Park District will lose funds

The Conejo Recreation & Park District board asks everyone who cares about recreation in Thousand Oaks — from youth sports participants and parents to high school athletes to cyclists to people who enjoy open space — to join us in opposing Measure B.

Your Park District board reviewed the potential impacts on our parks and recreational opportunities if Measure B passes. We did not need to look at the independent analysis prepared for the city for too long before realizing it will deprive the Park District of much-needed revenue. Measure B's detrimental effects on recreation and parks resulted in the board unanimously adopting a resolution opposing this proposed new law.

The loss of that new revenue will translate into reduced services, limit creation of the few remaining planned parks and play fields, constrain open-space funding and limit our ability to offer outstanding recreation programs that Conejo Valley residents have enjoyed and come to rely on for more than 45 years.

According to the independent analysis, Measure B could deprive the Park District of $330,000 each year in property-tax revenue, a major source of our annual operating budget. We could also forego $1.3 million in park dedication ("Quimby Fees") money that is used to acquire parkland and open space and to improve existing parks.

Other park districts that have faced similar financial cutbacks have cut staffing and program offerings or reduced watering days of their parks. The result of such measures is that our gorgeous park turf turns brown and becomes unkempt. Picture our young athletes running and playing all over long, brown grass. Not a pretty sight.

Other local agencies would also be detrimentally impacted if Measure B passes. The history of financial cooperation between the city of Thousand Oaks, the Conejo Valley Unified School District and the Park District would be jeopardized by the passage of Measure B as each agency would necessarily focus on its own core mission in an environment of dwindling resources.

Multiagency cooperation has helped create amenities such as the high-school pools, tracks, fields and theaters, the Teen Center, Senior Center, Brimhall Library, equestrian center, parks, athletic fields, open-space trails and has funded open-space purchases. Under financial stress, each agency must first fulfill its core mission while the maintenance and enhancement of these and other community assets atrophy. Make no mistake: Measure B will put additional financial stress on your local government agencies in the years ahead.

If you care about your local parks and the wide range of recreational opportunities in the Conejo Valley, please join me and the other members of the Conejo Recreation & Park District in opposing Measure B.

— George Lange of Thousand Oaks is chairman of the Conejo Recreation & Park District board of directors.

Discussions

Posted by hrwmnw on April 21, 2008 at 8:06 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Again more of the "sky is falling" arguements! If you read closely, the word used is always "COULD" in the arguments to vote against Measure B. There is no 100% proof that any of the cuts, deterioration or losses would or will come from the passage of it. The people of Thousand Oaks will approve smart and useful developements (remember this is only for projects over 100,000 square feet). Don't be fooled or let the boogie man stories or mailers affect your decision. Make it based on what is best for the entire city and not what is best for the bureaucrats or elected officals and who donates to them. In any case, if Mr. Lange was really concerned about the parks and recreation, Measure B should be passed since of course we won't be able to use the parks if it isn't. There "could" be all that bad air produced by the extra traffic we'll have! Let's get real and decide on what's best for the quality of life in TO.

Oh and remember...of course there "could" be an earthquake or you "could" get in a car accident tomorrow too, so don't take a chance and leave your house or go anywhere! Needless to say you do what you can to be safe and protect yourself best you can but you would not and shouldn't make all decisions in life if something "could" be. That's reality!

Vote "Yes" on Measure B.



Discuss this article
(Requires free registration.)

Article discussions on this site are to support community debates of issues related to our stories and editorials.

Discussions should not stray from the subject of the story or editorial.

We do not allow the following:

  • Posts that degrade others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation or disability.
  • Disparaging remarks, abusive language or obscene comments.
  • Threats, whether obvious or veiled.

We reserve the right to delete threads and/or ban users for these or other reasons we deem necessary.

Opinions are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Username:

Password:
(Forgotten your password?)

Your Turn:

Loading videos... If you don't see them shortly, you may need to download the Flash Player.