Weather | Beachcam
Login | Contact Us | Staff | Site Map | Archives | Alerts | Electronic Edition | Subscribe to the paper

HomeNewsCounty News

Matilija Dam removal OK'd

Senate sends bill to Bush for signature


Download Podcast  Download this story as a podcast!
Order Photos

WASHINGTON — Ventura County has finally won approval from Congress to tear down the Matilija Dam near Ojai.

The Senate voted 81-12 on Monday to authorize spending $144.5 million for the dam removal and restoration of the Ventura River.

The project was included in a $23 billion package that contains scores of water- and flood-control projects across the country. The bill is now headed to President Bush for his signature.

Bush has threatened to veto the legislation, citing the huge expense of the projects, but Democratic and Republican leaders predicted the Senate and the House would both be able to override a veto.

An aide to Rep. Lois Capps, D-Santa Barbara, noted the House passed the bill in August by a 381-40 vote and said the congresswoman's office feels confident that Bush's threat of a veto "is just talk."

Even if Bush signs the bill into law, funding for the Matilija Dam project is not guaranteed.

The bill doesn't provide money for the dam removal; it merely authorizes Congress to spend federal money on the project. The actual funding would be subject to an annual appropriation by Congress.

Still, getting the federal government's approval is a necessary hurdle that must be cleared before the dam removal can begin.

County Supervisor Steve Bennett says the project has strong support in Congress and actual funding will eventually be forthcoming.

"It wouldn't be in the water bill right now if there wasn't good support," Bennett said. "I think there will be challenges; some years you may get a little less than you hope; the timing may be stretched out a little longer than we would like. But I feel confident there will be funding after authorization."

The project has been a long time coming. It has been talked about for at least a decade, and it has been six years since the county signed an agreement with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to conduct a feasibility study.

The county appeared close to winning approval for the Matilija Dam removal last year when the House and the Senate passed a water bill that included the project. However, the bill died before negotiators for the chambers could resolve differences in the two versions.

Matilija Dam was built more than five decades ago and is now considered obsolete, with 95 percent of its water capacity choked by 6 million cubic yards of sediment.

The dam removal project is currently in the design phase. Actual removal of the dam is slated from 2010 to 2012, said Sue Hughes, Ventura County's legislative analyst.

Total cost of the project is projected at $144.5 million. The federal government's share is projected at $89.7 million. Local agencies would have to pick up the rest of the project costs.

The county already has received $7 million in state grants for design work, the construction of wells near Foster Park in Ventura and the removal of arundo from the watershed. Arundo is a nonnative, highly invasive weed that is destroying native habitat.

The state funding came from voter-approved bonds.

Discussions

Posted by sunnbear on September 25, 2007 at 8:44 a.m. (Suggest removal)

I say, "It's about time! Tear that sucker down!" Let's get the water flowing and get the Steelhead back!

Posted by smithjc on September 26, 2007 at 3:22 a.m. (Suggest removal)

how about dredging out the silt and using it for water storage again, like it was intended? the current lack of rain points out the need for adequate water storage.

Posted by smithjc on September 26, 2007 at 8:09 p.m. (Suggest removal)

while there would be a lot of dredging, my understanding is that, as a part of the dam removal process, they have to take all the silt, scrape it up and move elsewhere anyway.

so, if they do it now and start using the dam, all they need do is keep up with an occasional dredging to keep it cleared. even if they didn't continue the maintenance on it, which should have been done all along, the "next 2 or 3 el ninos" is still around a thirty year additional useful life.

Posted by Ventuckey on September 27, 2007 at 7:22 a.m. (Suggest removal)

smithjc,
There is a lot of information on the internet if you are interested about the dam.

The dam was constructed in 1947 and deemed obsolete and condemed in 1964.

In 1941, the Corps of Engineers Study concluded that Matilija would not provide adequate benefits to be cost effective for flood control & water supply before it was even constructed!

Excluding sediment, it only holds 3,800 acre-feet of water. Compared to Casitas which holds 254,000 acre-feet.

I'm glad we're doing the right thing be tearing that sucker down and restoreing the natural habitat. The benefits to our local beaches and tourism are huge. Imagine, sandy beaches in ventura again!

Posted by joefox on September 27, 2007 at 3:08 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Oh well another tree hugger will just shut down the whole area because of some 3 legged steel head frog from arroyo grande that was breed with a half bread condor! Human life before Wildlife! Just like the hot springs "private"

Posted by Ambz on October 1, 2007 at 1:06 p.m. (Suggest removal)

We all know no matter which way anything goes here in Ojai there will ALWAYS be a tree hugger chaining themselves to a tree or a rock in the creek bed. Just tear it down and lets be happy!



Discuss this article
(Requires free registration.)

Article discussions on this site are to support community debates of issues related to our stories and editorials.

Discussions should not stray from the subject of the story or editorial.

We do not allow the following:

  • Posts that degrade others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation or disability.
  • Disparaging remarks, abusive language or obscene comments.
  • Threats, whether obvious or veiled.

We reserve the right to delete threads and/or ban users for these or other reasons we deem necessary.

Opinions are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Username:

Password:
(Forgotten your password?)

Your Turn:

Loading videos... If you don't see them shortly, you may need to download the Flash Player.