Home › Local Elections: 2007 › Ventura City Council
Colorful candidate wants council slot
AUDIO
Candidate Interviews Listen to the Star's Editorial Board interviews with Ventura City Council candidates. Bill Fulton » Lou Cunningham» Mike Gibson » Doug Halter » Jerry Martin » Carl Morehouse » Christy Weir » Carroll Dean Williams » | |
STORY TOOLS
More from Ventura City Council
Editor's note: This is another in a series of profiles of the nine candidates running for three Ventura City Council seats in the Nov. 6.
Perennial challenger Brian Lee Rencher, who has run unsuccessfully for Ventura City Council eight times, has built a reputation as an emphatic government watchdog.
The former stockbroker, who says he passed on a lucrative career to be a "people's servant," contends the city is in transition, and it's time to reinvent how public services are financed. He said he feels the city spends too much on consultants and needs to place a greater focus on core city services such as paving streets, adding parks, replacing aging infrastructure and ensuring adequate public safety.
The 47-year-old has cemented a reputation as one of Ventura's most vocal, persistent civic activists -- and one of its most colorful.
At a public forum this month, Rencher said he wasn't putting a lot of energy into campaigning this year.
"I have already won," he told the audience. "If you think the definition of that is winning a seat on the City Council, then you're wrong. It's serving the public.
"I don't need to be on the council," he continued. "I already set the issues. They (city staff) do the work. I don't need to be on the council. I get things done."
Rencher did not respond to interview requests for this article and could not be reached for comment.
But in past interviews he has cast himself as a candidate who truly wants local government to be transparent, responsive to the community, and fiscally responsible with people's hard-earned tax dollars.
Rencher said he's seen a narrow group of people at City Hall who make decisions that tend to benefit themselves. The public deserves objective decision-makers who are not beholden to special interests, he said.
In 2002, Rencher was ordered to serve two days in jail after refusing to leave the podium at a council meeting in which he accused city leaders of breaking the law. Opponents say his disruptive behavior weakens his credibility.
Two weeks ago, Rencher was excluded from a forum by the Downtown Ventura Organization and Westside Community Council because he did not fill out a questionnaire required of participating candidates.
Rencher said he was busy and did not have time to fill out questionnaires. Rencher protested his exclusion, saying it was unfair.
He turned to the audience, asking at one point, "Is this the way that I'm treated in this community, after everything I have given this community free?" Organizers did not let him participate, and he watched quietly from his seat.
Michael Faulconer, a local architect and former chair of the city Planning Commission and Design Review Committee, has known Rencher for years and contributed to his campaign. Faulconer said Rencher comes from "a place of deep knowledge." Rencher has a master's degree in business administration.
"We don't always agree, but he has always brought rational suggestions and thoughts," Faulconer said. "He is very emphatic and passionate about the city. I think he does mean well. And I really believe he has helped to shape policy and direction as a result of his research and presentations."
Two years ago, Rencher finished seventh in a three-seat race, with 8.1 percent of the vote. He now faces three well-known incumbents and five challengers.
In a candid conversation after a forum this month, the former homeless man talked about happiness he's found working part-time, living in a house and being in a committed and loving relationship.
He pledged a softer approach if elected.
One of his biggest frustrations over the years, he said, is the efforts of The Star and critics in the community who try to marginalize his years of community service and repeated campaigns because he had chosen to live outdoors.
He said he chose to forgo a traditional lifestyle so he could attend city meetings day and night and spend hours poring over city transactions. He often can be seen riding his 21-speed bike. He regularly wears all black and keeps a row of bracelets on his arm that stretch from his wrist nearly to his elbow.
"Being elected will enable me to serve the community in bigger ways more quickly, effectively and affordably," reads a piece of his campaign literature. "I have accomplished a lot over the years, but like you, I, too, can do more.




Posted by fpecar4525 on October 27, 2007 at 10:06 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Now there's a bad idea. Vote for the angry, delusional homeless guy for a better Ventura? What can people be thinking to cast a ballot for someone such as Rencher?
Posted by THX1138 on October 28, 2007 at 10:41 a.m. (Suggest removal)
FP: There is a difference between being frustrated/passionate vs. someone that's angry. And, to say he's "delusional", do you have anything to back up that accusation?
If you've actually taken the time to listen to his presentations; he often asks poignant questions which demonstrates he's done his homework.
IMO we need new blood on the city council and hope that they keep the fluff spending to a minimum.
Posted by fpecar4525 on October 28, 2007 at 1:40 p.m. (Suggest removal)
To:THX1138
Yup, he's delusional and also has a terrible anger management problem. The problems facing Ventura are too serious to risk putting someone like Rencher in office. He needs help but we don't need his rants and wild accusations and occasional correct analysis. Rencher has a problem in that he wants people to notice him and he will often play to the crowd. As I say, we can do much better than that and we deserve better than that.
Posted by DoctorDude on October 30, 2007 at 9:28 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I voted for the guy. We need a little spice around here.
Posted by samuelbosworth on October 31, 2007 at 6:20 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I totally agree with THX. I've known Brian for years (we don't talk now because of a confrontation in my house) and he's so tunnel visioned he can't see whats actually around him. Ok, so he "chooses" to sleep outdoors and yes he "chooses" to be the "Peoples whatever". The reason why its this way. He can't hold a job and hold an apartment is because he thinks everyone is stupid and he's smarter then everyone else. Who can deal with an attitude like that???
Posted by samuelbosworth on October 31, 2007 at 6:21 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I erred. It was fpecar that I agreed with. Sorry THX
Posted by thsomerville on November 1, 2007 at 12:51 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Funny, DoctorDude. This guy seems pretty passionate and dedicated. You have to give him credit for that. He does seem to have his heart in the right place, regardless of his past issues with homelessness, etc. When's the last time any of you attended (or even watched on TV) a City Council meeting, not to mention ran for office? He's pretty brave to run and perhaps his past gives him a different outlook that could help some people in this town. Who knows? Chances are he won't win, by I commend him for putting himself out there and participating above and beyond in our democratic system. Yeah Rencher!
(Requires free registration.)
Article discussions on this site are to support community debates of issues related to our stories and editorials.
Discussions should not stray from the subject of the story or editorial.
We do not allow the following:
We reserve the right to delete threads and/or ban users for these or other reasons we deem necessary.
Opinions are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.