Weather | Beachcam
Login | Contact Us | Staff | Site Map | Archives | Alerts | Electronic Edition | Subscribe to the paper

HomeOpinionOpinion

Historical significance for today's world

Sixty-three years ago, Nazi Germany had overrun almost all of Europe and hammered England to the verge of bankruptcy and defeat. The Nazis had sunk more than 400 British ships in their convoys between England and America taking food and war materials.

At that time, the U.S. was in an isolationist, pacifist mood, and most Americans wanted nothing to do with the European or the Asian war.

Then, along came Pearl Harbor on Dec. 7, 1941 and, in outrage, Congress unanimously declared war on Japan, and the following day on Germany, who had not yet attacked us. It was a dicey thing. We had few allies. France was not an ally, as the Vichy government of France quickly aligned itself with its German occupiers. Germany was certainly not an ally as Adolf Hitler was intent on setting up a Thousand Year Reich in Europe. Japan was not an ally as it was well on its way to owning and controlling all of Asia.

Together, Japan and Germany had long-range plans of invading Canada and Mexico, as launching pads to get into the United States over our northern and southern borders, after they finished gaining control of Asia and Europe.

America's only allies then were England, Ireland, Scotland, Canada, Australia and Russia. That was about it. All of Europe, from Norway to Italy (except Russia in the east), was already under the Nazi heel.

The U.S. was certainly not prepared for war. It had drastically downgraded most of its military forces after World War I because of the Depression, so that at the outbreak of World War II, Army units were training with broomsticks because they didn't have guns, and cars with "tank" painted on the doors because they didn't have real tanks. A huge chunk of our Nay had just been sunk or damaged at Pear Harbor.

Britain had already gone bankrupt, saved only by the donation of $600 million in gold bullion in the Bank of England (that was actually the property of Belgium) given by Belgium to England to carry on the war when Belgium was overrun by Hitler (a little-known fact).

Actually, Belgium surrendered on one day because it was unable to oppose the German invasion, and the Germans bombed Brussels into rubble the next day just to prove they could.

Britain had already been holding out for two years in the face of staggering losses and the near decimation of its Royal Air Force in the Battle of Britain, and was saved from being overrun by Germany only because Hitler made the mistake of thinking the Brits were a relatively minor threat that could be dealt with later. Hitler first turned his attention to Russia in the late summer of 1940 at a time when England was on the verge of collapse.

Ironically, Russia saved America's rear by putting up a desperate fight for two years, until the U.S. got geared up to begin hammering away at Germany.

Russia lost something like 24 million people in the sieges of Stalingrad and Moscow alone — 90% of them from cold and starvation, mostly civilians, but also more than 1 million soldiers.

Had Russia surrendered, Hitler would have been able to focus his entire war effort against the Brits, then America. If that had happened, the Nazis could possibly have won the war.

All of this has been brought out to illustrate that turning points in history are often dicey things. Now, we find ourselves at another one of those key moments in history.

There is a very dangerous minority in Islam that either has, or wants, and may soon have, the ability to deliver small nuclear, biological, or chemical weapons, almost anywhere in the world.

The Jihads, the militant Muslims, are basically Nazis in Kaffiyahs — they believe that Islam, a radically conservative form of Wahhabi Islam, should own and control the Middle East first, then Europe, then the world. To them, all who do not bow to their will of thinking should be killed, enslaved or subjugated. They want to finish the Holocaust, destroy Israel and purge the world of Jews. This is their goal!

There is also a civil war raging in the Middle East — for the most part not a hot war, but a war of ideas. Islam is having its Inquisition and its Reformation, but it is not yet known which side will win — the Inquisitors, or the Reformationists.

If the Inquisition wins, then the Wahhabis, the Jihadis, will control the Middle East, the OPEC oil, and the US, European, and Asian economies.

The technoindustrial economies will be at the mercy of OPEC — not an OPEC dominated by the educated, rational Saudis of today, but an OPEC dominated by the Jihadis. Do you want gas in your car? Do you want heating oil next winter? Do you want the dollar to be worth anything? You had better hope the Jihad, the Muslim Inquisition, loses, and the Islamic Reformation wins.

If the Reformation movement wins, that is, the moderate Muslims who believe that Islam can respect and tolerate other religions, live in peace with the rest of the world, and move out of the 10th century into the 21st, then the troubles in the Middle East will eventually fade away. A moderate and prosperous Middle East will emerge.

We have to help the Reformation win, and to do that we have to fight the Inquisition, i.e., the Wahhabi movement, the Jihad, al Qaeda and the Islamic terrorist movements. We have to do it somewhere. We can't do it everywhere at once. We have created a focal point for the battle at a time and place of our choosing in Iraq . Not in New York, not in London, or Paris or Berlin, but in Iraq, where we are doing two important things.

1. We deposed Saddam Hussein. Whether Saddam was directly involved in the 9/11 terrorist attack or not, it is undisputed that he had been actively supporting the terrorist movement for decades.

2. We created a battle, a confrontation, a flash point, with Islamic terrorism in Iraq. We have focused the battle. We are killing bad people and the ones we get there we won't have to get here. We also have a good shot at creating a democratic, peaceful Iraq, which will be a catalyst for democratic change in the rest of the Middle East, and an outpost for a stabilizing American military presence in the Middle East for as long as it is needed.

World War II, the war with the Japanese and German Nazis, really began with a whimper" in 1928. It did not begin with Pearl Harbor. It began with the Japanese invasion of China. It was a war for 14 years before the U.S. joined it. It officially ended in 1945 and was followed by another decade of U.S. occupation in Germany and Japan to get those countries reconstructed and running on their own a gain, a 27-year war.

World War II cost the United States an amount equal to approximately a full years GDP —- adjusted for inflation, equal to about $12 trillion. World War II cost America more than 400,000 soldiers killed in action and nearly 100,000 still missing in action.

The Iraq war has, so far, cost the United States about $456 billion. It has also cost more than 3,800 American lives.

The cost of not fighting and winning World War II would have been unimaginably greater — a world dominated by Japanese Imperialism and German Nazism.

This is not a "60-Minute" TV show, or a two-hour movie in which everything comes out OK . The real world is riot like that. It is messy, uncertain and sometimes bloody and ugly. It always has been, and probably always will be.

The bottom line is that we wilt have to deal with Islamic terrorism until we defeat it, whenever that is. It will not go away if we ignore it.

If the U.S. can create a reasonably democratic and stable Iraq, then we have an ally, like England, In the Middle East, a platform, from which we can work to help modernize and moderate the Middle East. The history of the world is the clash between the forces of relative civility and civilization, and the barbarians clamoring at the gates to conquer the world.

The Iraq war is merely another battle in this ancient and never-ending war. Now, for the first time ever, the barbarians are about to get nuclear weapons, unless somebody prevents them from getting them.

We have four options:

1. We can defeat the Jihad now, before it gets nuclear weapons.

2 We can fight the Jihad later, after it gets nuclear weapons (which may be as early as next year, if Iran's progress on nuclear weapons is what Iran claims it is).

3. We can surrender to the Jihad and accept its dominance in the Middle East now; in Europe in the next few years or decades, and, ultimately, in America.

Or

4. We can stand down now, and pick up the fight later when the Jihad is more widespread and better armed, perhaps after the Jihad has dominated France and Germany and possibly most of the rest of Europe. It will, of course, be more dangerous, more expensive, and much bloodier.

If you oppose this war, I hope you like the idea that your children, or grandchildren, may live in an Islamic America under the Mullahs and the Sharia, an America that resembles Iran today.

The history of the world is the history of civilization clashes, cultural clashes. All wars are about ideas, ideas about what society and civilization should be like, and the most determined always win.

Those who are willing to be the most ruthless always win. The pacifists always lose because the anti-pacifists kill them.

Remember, perspective is every thing, and America's schools teach too little history for perspective to be clear.

The Cold War lasted from about 1947 at least until the Berlin Wall came down in 1989, 42 years!

Europe spent the first half of the 19th century fighting Napoleon, and from 1870 to 1945 fighting Germany!

World War II began in 1928, lasted 17 years, plus a 10-year occupation, and the U.S. still has troops in Germany and Japan. World War II resulted in the death of more than 50 million people, maybe more than 100 million people, depending on which estimates you accept.

The U.S. has taken more than 3,800 killed in action in Iraq. The U.S. took more than 4,000 killed in action on the morning of June 6, 1944, the first day of the Normandy Invasion to rid Europe of Nazi Imperialism.

In World War II, the U.S averaged 2,000 killed in action a week for four years. Most of the individual battles of World War II lost more Americans than the entire Iraq war has done so far.

The stakes are at least as high — a world dominated by representative governments with civil rights, human rights and personal freedoms or a world dominated by a radical Islamic Wahhabi movement, by the Jihad, under the Mullahs and the Sharia (Islamic law).

It's difficult to understand why the average American does not grasp this. They favor human rights, civil rights, liberty and freedom, but evidently not for Iraqis.

"Peace activists" always seem to demonstrate here in America, where it's safe.

Why don't we see peace activists demonstrating in Iran, Syria, Iraq, Sudan, North Korea, in the places that really need peace activism the most? I'll tell you why! They would be killed!

The liberal mentality is supposed to favor human rights, civil rights, democracy, multiculturalism, diversity, etc., but if the Jihad wins, wherever the Jihad wins, it is the end of civil rights, human rights, democracy, multiculturalism, diversity, etc.

Americans who oppose the liberation of Iraq are coming down on the side of their own worst enemy!

— Raymond S. Kraft is a writer living in Northern California who has studied the Middle Eastern culture and religion.

Discussions

Posted by laura_54321 on October 23, 2007 at 6:20 a.m. (Suggest removal)

This essay is based on flawed premises. First, the idea that Saddam was in some way alligned with the radicals we must defeat is in no way grounded in reality.
Second, the idea that we are "fighting them in a place of our choosing"- Iraq- is a construction of fantasy. We created a vacuum in Iraq where radicals could step in and start killing, which has in no way furthered the cause of human rights for Iraqis.
Yes, Islam is probably in the midst of reformation. And somehow we cannot grasp that our militarism is not inspiring people toward reform- it's burying people in fear and loss.
The author is not wrong in his assertion that the reformation deserves our support, nor is he wrong that the fundamentalists would craft a terrible world if left unchecked.
But the idea that we do it this way or we're isolationists is stupid and shallow.

Posted by rjlebeck on October 23, 2007 at 8:18 a.m. (Suggest removal)

What I oppose is the occupation of Iraq, not it's liberation. Kraft massages and distorts history as way of minimizing the death and the losses in Iraq. If the threat in Iraq from the terrorists is as serious and as dire as the one posed by Hitler and the Axis powers in WWII, why is the United States the only country fighting the threat militarily?

The jihadists will never say uncle. They will always resolve to kill Americans and the Jews. We will always have enemies in this world and we must be constantly vigilant and determined to strike our enemies when they mean to do us harm.

What is discomforting is Kraft's willingness to topple nations and regimes in the pursuit of eradicating an ideological threat. His is a dangerous and reckless committment to fighting a war with an enemy that has no real army and no country to defend. Apparently Kraft has no qualms in having another 500,000 U.S. troops die to protect us from a threat that doesn't yet exist.

If America wanted to fight terrorism it would do so by engaging and cooperating with the nation-states of our friends and enemies alike to advance political and social reform in countries where such hatred for the west grows like a cancer. We will never win this war with another precision bomb or night-time raid that only serves to create more orphans and widows and more future terrorists.

We might also consider developing alternative fuels to extricate us from the dangerous reliance on Mid-East oil. This is a challenge that is lost on most Americans who seem to prefer dead soldiers to an empty gas tank.

How will we know when this war is won? When Playboy bunnies are safe to strip tease in Baghdad or Mecca? When democracies only elect leaders that will do our bidding?

It was a mistake from the very beginning to bestow status to the terrorists by trumpeting a global war. They are a despicable lot and should be fought with cunning and decisive action but we should never have allowed them the status of a soldier and the legitamacy of an armed combatant. They are criminals and should be brought to justice. No less, no more.

Posted by sslocal on October 23, 2007 at 10:41 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Complaining about the venue does not fix it. Arguing about the method does not fix it either.

The article is right about the fact that they will do their very best to force us to except Islam or die trying to resist. I don't agree with the method either but I will leave it up to the people that know more about asymmetrical warfare than I to take care of.

laura: Saddam was paying 25K to suicide bombers families. I would call that support of terrorism.

rjlebeck: Your kidding right? Have you noticed France burning? Have you read about Euro women being raped by Muslim men because they dressed a certain way? About authors being killed because of what they wrote? About riots over some cartoon images? Please, Europe is bogged down in its liberal outlook on the world and will do nothing to help either itself or us until it is to late.
You might also want to think about the people running to be the next POTUS. A number of them want our country to be just like Europe.

Will we force our women wear the burka? Will we bow to Mecca 5 times a day? Make your choice.

Posted by rjlebeck on October 23, 2007 at 4:01 p.m. (Suggest removal)

sslocal,

If you need a fix, I got one for you. It will cost a damn sight fewer lives than the one Mr. Kraft is proposing.

Free Kurdistan. Now!

We have a real problem in case nobody was noticing. Turkish troops are poised to launch military incursions into Iraq to attack PKK terrorist strongholds. why, after all this time has there been no diplomatic track between the Turks and the Kurds? The war appears to be spreading and it is the continuing American presence itself that is fueling most of the unrest.

So Saddam paid 25K to the murderer's family. That's probably a better benefit package than the one given to Blackwater employees.

The French will always be the French. We Americans should be a little more confident of who we are as a nation and not fear a woman in a burka or someone who bows to Mecca five times a day. In America there is not a law that I know of that bans the amount of skin you can cover or the amount of clothes you can wear on a hot summer day. We are also free, each according to his creed, to worship God. We, as Americans, should never fear liberty.

We just need to be smarter and stop selling off the country to the highest bidder.

And it would also help if we stopped electing stupid and greedy presidents, and stubborn leaders.

Posted by sslocal on October 23, 2007 at 6:59 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Hey, I'm with you. I have stated before that I am no fan of this war. We never should have gone in. I would favor a more restrained approch.
I don't understand your Blackwater comment. No matter, they will be gone soon.
It's not just France. The whole of Europe seem to be infected.
You rant all you want, yes you are ranting, but it will not change how "they" feel about us. Leaving Iraq will not fix it.
In fact, I will even buy you a beer if the next POTUS removes the military from Iraq and we suffer no more attacks for say 2 years afterwords.



Discuss this article
(Requires free registration.)

Article discussions on this site are to support community debates of issues related to our stories and editorials.

Discussions should not stray from the subject of the story or editorial.

We do not allow the following:

  • Posts that degrade others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation or disability.
  • Disparaging remarks, abusive language or obscene comments.
  • Threats, whether obvious or veiled.

We reserve the right to delete threads and/or ban users for these or other reasons we deem necessary.

Opinions are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Username:

Password:
(Forgotten your password?)

Your Turn:

Loading videos... If you don't see them shortly, you may need to download the Flash Player.