Weather | Beachcam
Login | Contact Us | Staff | Site Map | Archives | Alerts | Electronic Edition | Subscribe to the paper

HomeNewsConejo Valley

Portion of Santa Susana site could be park by '09

Cleanup standards would be eased if the property is used as parkland


Download Podcast  Download this story as a podcast!
Order Photos

A thousand acres of the Santa Susana Field Laboratory may become parkland as early as 2009, Boeing Co. officials said Thursday.

The land, which sits on the southern border of the 2,850-acre facility in the hills south of Simi Valley, is a buffer zone and was not used for operations at the former nuclear and rocket engine test site.

Its use as parkland would require the determination by state regulators that the contaminated site is clean enough to be released for public use.

A week ago, Boeing announced its intention to transfer 2,400 acres of the field laboratory to the state after the property is cleaned. The land would be restricted to use as parkland, open space and recreational activities.

The announcement coincided with Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signing into law a bill, SB990, that prohibits the release of the field laboratory for any use unless it is cleaned to the strictest of cleanup standards.

However, the standards in the new law would be voided by an amendment carried by its author, Sen. Sheila Kuehl, D-Santa Monica, once Boeing Co. and the state strike a binding agreement on the land transfer.

The binding agreement would set standards agreed to by Boeing officials and two state regulatory agencies. The land would be cleaned to a level appropriate for residential use.

"In order for there to be a transfer to the state — a gift to the state — that condition, that standard in SB990 needs to be changed," said Steve Barker, president of Boeing Realty.

Activists have derided the agreement between the state and Boeing, and the proposed amendment, which would require the Legislature's vote.

"What they want to do is ignore the new law and do no additional cleanup whatsoever, and we won't let that happen," said Dan Hirsch of the nuclear watchdog group Committee to Bridge the Gap.

"We will deliver on what we promised," said Tom Gallacher, Boeing's director of environment, health and safety. That standard is stricter than what is required as open space.

Gallacher said it would be impossible for the company to clean the site to the level called for in Kuehl's bill, which is the level set for Environmental Protection Agency Superfund sites.

"Based on technology we cannot meet the standard for all isotopes," he said. "It makes it unachievable for us."

Environmental watchdogs disputed Boeing's assertions.

"These are EPA standards set across the country so there is no reason they couldn't meet them," said James Birkelund of the National Resources Defense Council.

Discussions about the future of the site began in earnest about 18 months ago, when it became clear that NASA would be wrapping up its operations at the field laboratory. The space agency owns 450 acres at the site, and the land transfer applies only to the acreage Boeing owns.

Conversations between Boeing and the state began earlier this year.

Additional pieces of the land would be released for park use as they are cleaned and given approval by the state.

Discussions

Posted by schlederdecopan on October 19, 2007 at 9:52 a.m. (Suggest removal)

There's another really good park to visit on your weekends with the kids....

one mile east of the Mission San Buenaventura on Main St., in the City of San Buenaventura, you'll find a beautiful sloping seven acres of grass and trees overlooking the Channel Islands.

Never mind the fact that renamed by the City, Cemetery Memorial Park is really St. Mary's/Protestant/Hebrew Cemeteries where still, to this day 3,000 County pioneers lay in desecrated graves.

Visit www.restorestmarys.org for details

Posted by SSFLwatcher on October 19, 2007 at 10:10 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Your article has the facts wrong, sorry.

The cleanup standards at SSFL will be voided if the governor and Boeing come up with ANY deal, not a deal regarding land transfer. They could agree to relable the site "nuclear waste land that will never be cleaned up," and it will void the standards.

Come on, can't you people do some real investigative reporting? Try doing your own research and not parroting whatever the Governor and Boeing tell you.

Posted by mclapressclub on October 19, 2007 at 10:55 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Note that the headline is wrong: it should be part of the lab, the so-called buffer zone, is what's being talked about here. The real laugher is the map that was online (and presumably in print)which shows some site north of the 118 Freeway, miles away from Rocketdyne. It's as if someone on LSD edited this article and supplied the art to an otherwise competent piece by my colleague. We try to avoid those mistakes covering the issue at www.EnviroReporter.com -- Michael Collins

Posted by mclapressclub on October 20, 2007 at 1:25 p.m. (Suggest removal)

The Star has amended their headline here to be accurate and changed the graphic to show Rocketdyne in the correct area. It is to be commended for that. Unfortunately, this is a graphic used before that incorrectly shows a big white area around the lab that is misleading: Rocketdyne directly borders Runkle Canyon on the west which is why it is thought that pollution emanating from the lab is going downhill into Runkle as asserted on www.StopRunkledyne.com. Regardless, kudos to the Star!



Discuss this article
(Requires free registration.)

Article discussions on this site are to support community debates of issues related to our stories and editorials.

Discussions should not stray from the subject of the story or editorial.

We do not allow the following:

  • Posts that degrade others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation or disability.
  • Disparaging remarks, abusive language or obscene comments.
  • Threats, whether obvious or veiled.

We reserve the right to delete threads and/or ban users for these or other reasons we deem necessary.

Opinions are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Username:

Password:
(Forgotten your password?)

Your Turn:

Loading videos... If you don't see them shortly, you may need to download the Flash Player.