Weather | Beachcam
Login | Contact Us | Staff | Site Map | Archives | Alerts | Electronic Edition | Subscribe to the paper

HomeNewsConejo Valley

Group to focus on Rancho Potrero uses

Specific plan to be developed for 316 acres near T.O.


Download Podcast  Download this story as a podcast!

The golf course idea has been abandoned.

Keeping Rancho Potrero's rolling hills with the ocean view open space is still part of the plan. But what about picnic areas on the 316-acre site, just outside Thousand Oaks? Or maybe an outdoor classroom?

Those are some of the ideas for the property on the south side of Lynn Road in the Dos Vientos area, between Via Las Brisas and Rancho Dos Vientos Drive.

Refining the concepts for the picturesque parkland will fall to a focus group that will convene next month.

The group includes representatives from each of the Dos Vientos homeowners associations, the neighboring equestrian center, the Conejo Open Space Trails Advisory Committee, the general equestrian community, the owners of the adjacent property, the National Parks Service and a former City Council member.

"We'll work with them to come up with the specifics of how will this work," said Jim Friedl, general manager of the Conejo Recreation and Park District. "We look at this focus group as refining the concept plan to have more specifics rather than a gray blob on a page."

The refined ideas will be worked into a specific plan, which outlines what can be put in a certain area.

Community members and the boards for the Park District and Conejo Open Space Conservation Agency will have a chance to provide input on the specific plan before it heads to Thousand Oaks' Planning Commission and City Council.

Any necessary environmental reviews would also be conducted at the site.

The culmination of the work that begins next month will be an effort to annex the property into the city and Park District's jurisdiction.

"We're hoping to have it annexed by the end of the year," Friedl said.

There was an effort to annex the property in 2003, but it didn't pan out. The proposed zoning at the time was too broad and would have allowed for a host of uses on the scenic land.

The specific plan will help nail down what would be allowed on the property.

"It's an important project," said Mark Towne, deputy director of the city's Department of Community Development. "We've come a long way, and this is really the last major step in this process."

The effort to develop a specific plan started in 2005 with the Conejo Open Space Conservation Agency, a joint powers agency created by an agreement between the city of Thousand Oaks and the Park District.

A total of 640 acres there were purchased in 1993, with the city putting in $1 million, the Park District $1.9 million, and the Mountains Recreation and Conservation Authority contributing $1.4 million.

The National Park Service bought 314 acres, buying out the conservation authority.

Discussions

Posted by SUEBABY on May 29, 2007 at 9:10 a.m. (Suggest removal)

GAAAAAAH! Why, why, WHY do we insist on putting crap on every available scrap of land?!?!?!?! Get it together, council members; open space is precious... and rapidly dwindling! Why not try this: Put nothing there - no picnic areas, no outdoor classrooms - and leave at least a LITTLE space for the natural beauty that makes (has made, anyway) this area so desirable???

Posted by kelley.t.m on May 31, 2007 at 8:09 a.m. (Suggest removal)

I agree. Leave it bare and let it live the way its supposed to live.

Reminds me of all the silliness about putting something on every single side of the Civic Arts Plaza.



Discuss this article
(Requires free registration.)

Article discussions on this site are to support community debates of issues related to our stories and editorials.

Discussions should not stray from the subject of the story or editorial.

We do not allow the following:

  • Posts that degrade others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation or disability.
  • Disparaging remarks, abusive language or obscene comments.
  • Threats, whether obvious or veiled.

We reserve the right to delete threads and/or ban users for these or other reasons we deem necessary.

Opinions are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Username:

Password:
(Forgotten your password?)

Your Turn:

Loading videos... If you don't see them shortly, you may need to download the Flash Player.