Weather | Beachcam
Login | Contact Us | Staff | Site Map | Archives | Alerts | Electronic Edition | Subscribe to the paper

HomeNewsCounty News

Rice compares terrorism war to communism fight


Download Podcast  Download this story as a podcast!
Jason Redmond / Star staff
At the Reagan Library in Simi Valley, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, left, greets fifth-graders from Immaculate Conception school in Los Angeles.

Jason Redmond / Star staff At the Reagan Library in Simi Valley, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, left, greets fifth-graders from Immaculate Conception school in Los Angeles.

Order Photos

In a discussion with her Australian counterpart, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice compared President Reagan's fight against communism to the current war on terrorism, calling both generational struggles.

"I would hope what we would all be remembered for is having understood that struggle, having engaged in that struggle," Rice said Wednesday. "President Bush has mobilized this country for that fight."

Rice and Australian Minister of Foreign Affairs Alexander Downer were guest speakers at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library and Museum in Simi Valley. The discussion, called "Dialogue on Freedom," included media and audience questions.

The talk was marked by solidarity in diplomatic goals.

Rice and Downer, whose country has 1,500 troops stationed in Iraq and Afghanistan, spent an hour talking to an audience of about 450 people. They discussed trying to bring the war in Iraq to a successful conclusion.

Rice praised Australia for engaging Tehran ahead of next week's talks between the United States and Iran. That meeting in Baghdad is designed to get the Islamic republic to cooperate in quelling Iraq's sectarian violence.

"We have the really very strong support of Australia," Rice said. "Because Australia has diplomatic relations, it's been able to deliver those messages directly."

Downer said he has stressed to Iran that it should commit to stability in Iraq during the talks, set to begin Monday.

"I've made the point to the Iranians that they need to think about their long-term strategic interest in Iraq," Downer said. "They don't want to see the collapse of the present government."

Rice started the discussion at the library with a short speech.

"Things are changing in international policy. ... If you recognize that threats must be confronted, good things do happen," Rice said. "They happen not just because of the strength of the United States, but the strength of our friends and our alliances."

Rice and Downer started the day with a closed-door meeting in a room adjacent to the late president's office. Former first lady Nancy Reagan still keeps an office in the quarters.

Both praised Nancy Reagan, who sat in the first row of the audience.

Recalling Reagan's famous Cold War call to the Soviet Union to tear down the Berlin Wall, Rice said that seemingly impossible changes in world politics were feasible, given courage and steadfastness.

"If you look back on history, many events that seemed impossible at the time, in retrospect, seem inevitable," Rice said. "Did anyone ever believe that the wall would come down? And indeed it did."

The two often remarked on the countries' longstanding friendship. To maintain that level of trust and sincerity "involves standing by your ally, not only when it is convenient, but also when it is inconvenient," Downer said.

He said Australia backed the United States in the war in Iraq because "not only is the United States the bedrock of foreign policy, we also did it because it was the right thing to do."

Downer continued, drawing parallels between past presidents and Bush. He said Bush shows courage, a quality also exhibited by Reagan. He recalled the time that Reagan labeled the Soviet Union an "evil empire."

"That seemed to be an unpopular view at the time, but he's the man who won the Cold War," Downer said.

He also mentioned President Truman's low approval ratings toward the end of his presidency.

"The Korean War was unpopular," he said. "But he made decisions for the medium and long-term, which I think were enormously important."

Rice traced international politics and the United States' relations with Australia from World War I, the Korean War, to the fall of the Soviet Union in 1989. But the war on terrorism was the top issue in their discussion.

"I get up every day and I recognize that we are still in danger, because the terrorists only have to be right once," Rice said. "We have to be right 100 percent of the time, and that's not fair fighting."

Downer, at Rice's invitation, is making a short visit to California. They were later to visit U.S. Marines at Camp Pendleton. They plan to visit Northern California's Silicon Valley today before Downer returns to Australia.

Wire services contributed to this report.

Discussions

Posted by cslaurie on May 24, 2007 at 7:28 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Let's see fight against communism equals war on terror.

Seems like the commies are doing just fine if China is any example. They are dismantling our manufacturing and now farming base. Cuba is alive and well and we are actively seeking trade with Vietnam. There are more but you get the point.

I object to this blatant spin coming out of Washington. Now if we get out of Iraq, Al-queda will move in - funny they weren't there before. I quess Iraqis love other flavors of Arabs....

Posted by shaver_one on May 24, 2007 at 9:24 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Sorry, Condi.
What you folks will be remembered for is attacking a sovereign country that did not attack the US, had no intensions of attacking the US, did not have the means to attack the US, resulting in a much more dangerous world for us to live in.
Thank you VERY MUCH, Condi.

(I would, again, call for the defunding of the Iraq War, but the Democrats in Congress have proved they're made of jelly.)

http://shaverone.blog.com

Posted by hillhoppy on May 28, 2007 at 2:33 p.m. (Suggest removal)

You ask for a defunding of the war - Have you ever thought what ramifications that possiblity might have on our soldiers that are still out there in Iraq? When the General on the ground out there is saying that they need more troops and more funding! Yes, I agree this war has taken way to long. If everyone looks back though to where it all began, Yes we were attacked in New York, by Al Quaida members, has that slipped everyones mind. That is how all of this began and I didn't see too many people disagreeing with the start of the war back then. No one can call the future of a war - it goes as is does and you compensate in areas where needed. No one planned for it to take as long as it has been. Everyone says that Bush is finishing his father's war, or it about the texas gold, if that was the case then he would have stopped it after Sadaam was executed and as far as the oil goes, if thats what hes out there for I'd definately say he's loosing his a**! I'm not a supporter of the president by any means, but He should be given credit as far as he has been more straight out - as far as doing as he says. I'm sorry I got side tracked - main point I'm trying to say as who cares what comparison Rice was trying to make - bottom line is we have troops fighting in a war over seas and we as Americans need to do what ever we can to help bring them home safely, I don't think defunding the war is in any way going to help bring them home safely!!!! Yes, I do have had family members over there in the beginning and have some over there now. Right now some of the soldiers fears are Bush not getting the funding needed to ensure their safe return, within reason! Most of all people you need to support out soldiers and stop bickering over the BS!
As far as them finding something for us to fear, I don't believe it was congress' idea to have terrorists strike the twin towers. So my fear was put in my by the terrorists! Unless you are one to think that those actions were part of another "conspiracy theory", which wouldn't surprise me any, with all the ignorant people who no everything about nothing in todays society!



Discuss this article
(Requires free registration.)

Article discussions on this site are to support community debates of issues related to our stories and editorials.

Discussions should not stray from the subject of the story or editorial.

We do not allow the following:

  • Posts that degrade others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation or disability.
  • Disparaging remarks, abusive language or obscene comments.
  • Threats, whether obvious or veiled.

We reserve the right to delete threads and/or ban users for these or other reasons we deem necessary.

Opinions are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Username:

Password:
(Forgotten your password?)

Your Turn:

Loading videos... If you don't see them shortly, you may need to download the Flash Player.