Home › News › Local News
Residents concerned about chemicals
They want strawberry farm banned from using fumigant
Chuck Kirman / Star staff Kathleen Neprud holds her grandson Branden Gill, 4, while talking with neighbor Leo Montero in Neprud's backyard, which abuts a strawberry field.
Anchored in soil, the plastic tarps stretched over vast fields by strawberry farmers are supposed to capture pesticide emissions and make people feel safe.
But in one midtown Ventura neighborhood, the recent sight of tarps being applied on a field some 30 yards from homes triggered suspicion and worry.
Residents on Channel Drive, fearful of being exposed to farm chemicals, filed a challenge Friday to the county's authorization of the use of the soil fumigant chloropicrin on the 45-acre field that borders their homes and is within three blocks of Blanche Reynolds School.
The Ventura County Agricultural Commissioner's Office said the use of chloropicrin a popular replacement for methyl bromide is perfectly legal and the farmer is following the law.
No notification required
Growers say soil fumigants are the most efficient way of killing off pests and generating the greatest crop yield.
But that's little reassurance to resident Kathleen Neprud, a part-time art teacher who cares for her grandson at home three days a week. She said chloropicrin, which was used as tear gas in World War I, would put residents, including the elderly and schoolchildren, at risk.
Unlike methyl bromide, the use of chloropicrin requires neither public notification nor a buffer zone.
"Unless you recognize what all that plastic means, how would you know the dangers that are there?" Neprud said. "This feels like a steamroller."
But Susan Johnson, deputy agricultural commissioner, said the residents have nothing to fear.
"If we believed the residents were in any danger, we would not issue a permit. Period," she said.
"We are sympathetic to the residents' concerns, but we cannot simply say no to farmers who have a right to farm their land."
Farmer is frustrated, too
For decades, row crops such as lettuce, broccoli and celery have been planted on the field, which sits between Highway 101 and the railroad tracks behind Channel Drive.
The farmer, Edgar Terry of Terry Farms, said he would be happy to grow something else or go organic, but his lease payment on the land is increasing 8 percent to $2,600 an acre on July 1.
He estimates that over the past eight years, the compounded annual rent on his cropland has gone up by 20 percent.
The economic pressures to stay in business force him to rely on chemicals.
"I have to be able to find crops that justify those land rents," he said. "Unfortunately, row crops won't do it anymore."
In use for decades
Chloropicrin has benefited crop owners since the 1920s. Its popularity has surged now that the more toxic methyl bromide is being phased out internationally, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Ventura County strawberry growers also face strict caps on emissions from chloropicrin and other chemicals at the beginning of 2008, the state announced Friday. They might have to resort to pulling thousands of acres out of production to meet the new smog targets.
The colorless, nonflammable liquid is injected into the soil through a drip system buried 3 to 4 inches underground to destroy pests and get the soil ready for planting. The plastic tarp is sealed on top to trap emissions.
Terry said he will hire a professional soil fumigator to apply a blend of chloropicrin and telone over a period of several days sometime in the next two weeks, unless his permit is revoked.
His crews would oversee the process. Strawberries would be planted in June.
"We are doing every possible thing we can to make sure there is no drift," Terry said. "I understand the neighbors' concerns. I have kids, too."
The Pesticide Action Network, a nonprofit organization based in San Francisco, believes chloropicrin to be a dangerous pesticide and says exposure poses health risks, including gastrointestinal problems, eye and skin irritation, blurred vision and dizziness.
A 'bad actor' chemical
"It's a 'bad actor' chemical that we would like to see phased out and banned," spokeswoman Stephenie Hendricks said.
In 2005, about 360 residents in the Salinas area were exposed to chloropicrin when it was improperly applied to a nearby strawberry field. Many suffered watery eyes and sore throats.
Leo Montero, who has three children living at his Channel Drive home, said prevailing winds often blow off the ocean toward the homes, and passing trains stir up dust and dirt from the field that circulate into their yards.
"I will challenge anyone when it comes to my kids' lives," Montero said.
The Agricultural Commissioner's Office has 10 days to issue a written decision on the neighbors' challenge.
Rampant mistrust
According to Johnson, some 20,000 acres are fumigated each year in Ventura County. "It is simply impossible for us to notify everyone near every field," Johnson said.
Even if the office did require notification, she said, it likely wouldn't be beneficial because mistrust of agriculture is rampant.
"There is nothing we could say that they would believe," she said.
In the future, the office hopes to have a Web site to post notices of fumigation. Ventura-area growers already have implemented safety techniques not required by the state, such as using the tarps.
"Our hope," Johnson said, "is that people will coexist with farming or help to take the land out of farming."






Posted by shaver_one on May 21, 2007 at 12:31 p.m. (Suggest removal)
You moved in next to a farm...knowing full-well that it was a farm.
Without chemical treatments, there would be no farm.
If there is no farming allowed on that land, it will be replaced with housing or industry. Do you want your neighborhood overrun with Urban Sprawl, looking like L.A.? Can you imagine the b----ing if industry moved in?
Posted by Ventura22 on May 21, 2007 at 4:49 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Some of those homes have been there since the 1960's or earlier folks. It seems like they are a little past the stage of "moving in and making demands". They most likely weren't using such highly toxic gases back in those days. I'll bet Mr. Terry doesn't live near this field and won't have to put his family at risk. I'd trust the farmers statements if they lived ajacent to their crops; downwind. He is not looking out for the best interests of the community around his fields. He's only interested in making as much money as he can by using chemicals to force a crop to grow where nature would dictate otherwise. Perhaps he should move-in to one of those homes in question; maybe then we could grant him some level of credibility.
Not all farms use such dangerous chemicals either. You can't expect the average resident to be able to make the assumption that they all use chemicals as toxic as this genie in a bottle. This is a BAD chemical and everyone that lives/works near it should be concerned; regardless of what business the user is operating under; ag or industrial. The residents are well justified in challenging this farmer who wants to start using this chemical. He should be required to put up gas detectors & alarms around the perimeter to check for leaks. The same measures should be in-place that the law would require of any other type of business that wants to use this stuff and make him go through the hazardous materials permit and plan review process.
Posted by JepsonVash on May 21, 2007 at 11:59 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I can't believe that all those people are crying about the government using miniscule amounts of glyphosate on noxious weeds, but not about all the chloropicrin wafting through town. 'Poisoning our environment' indeed.
Posted by InformedCitizen on June 5, 2007 at 10:04 p.m. (Suggest removal)
It does not matter whether residents live downwind, upwind, or ON TOP OF the farm because if you READ the article, you would realize that the fumigants would not be administered by spraying, they would be injected into the ground through a drip line system, enclosed in a plastic covering. This is the same principle as fumigating a house. If you want to stop farmers from fumigating crops, stop people from fumigating their homes too.
One thing I do NOT understand for the life of me is how the people of Ventura can pass S.O.A.R and similar acts to "save" farmland, and then turn around and tell the farmer that no, he CANT farm. He can't use his fumigants and pesticides anymore. Small farmers can't afford to grow organic because without administering pesticides they lose a significant amount of their crop and because of this loss, the price of the food in grocery stores must go up. People DO NOT care where their food comes from, they care about price. I doubt that even you carry an apple up to a store manager just to ask where and how the fruit was grown.
Pesticides have been in use since 2500 BC...GET OVER IT
(Requires free registration.)
Article discussions on this site are to support community debates of issues related to our stories and editorials.
Discussions should not stray from the subject of the story or editorial.
We do not allow the following:
We reserve the right to delete threads and/or ban users for these or other reasons we deem necessary.
Opinions are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.