Weather | Beachcam
Login | Contact Us | Staff | Site Map | Archives | Alerts | Electronic Edition | Subscribe to the paper

HomeNewsCounty News

Contract under review

County workers express mixed feelings


Download Podcast  Download this story as a podcast!

Union members had mixed reviews Wednesday of the contract proposal that their leaders negotiated this week with the county of Ventura.

The Service Employees International Union is the county's largest union, representing close to 4,000 workers. On Tuesday, SEIU negotiators reached a tentative contract agreement with the county to give workers an across-the-board salary increase of 7.5 percent over the next two years and two months, along with an increase in funding of retirement benefits and a $24 per month increase in the county's contribution to workers' healthcare premiums. The increase will keep most county workers paying no out-of-pocket premiums.

The agreement still must be approved by both the Ventura County Board of Supervisors and the union membership. Members will vote by mail over the next two weeks, and the Board of Supervisors is likely to vote on it in September.

On Wednesday night, about 200 union members gathered at the Unitarian Universalist Church in Ventura to hear their leadership explain the details of the proposed contract.

The deal was the result of "a hard push" and "some drama at the bargaining table" over the past week, said Sandy Stewart, the director of the SEIU's Ventura County region.

Last week, county negotiators were ready to walk away from the table after four months, Stewart said.

The sides were separated by half a percent in salary, and a union vote on whether to authorize a strike was set for Wednesday. But on Tuesday afternoon, the county proposed an additional 0.5 percent raise in 2008, and union negotiators agreed, averting the need for a strike vote.

Union members still met on Wednesday, but they gathered to debate the proposed contract rather than whether to strike.

The workers who spoke during the meeting were split fairly evenly on the contract. Some said negotiators should have held out for a 10 percent raise over two years, while others said 7.5 percent was a good deal, since the county's early offers were about 3 percent.

"I think it's really good, for what they started from," David Escamilla, a Human Services Agency employee, said after the meeting.

Ena Carcamo, another Human Services Agency worker, said she's "half-and-half" on the proposal. "I'm leaning toward voting against it," she said. "I think we can do better."

However, Carcamo said, she would not be willing to strike if the union can't do any better than the current deal. Like many county workers, she can't spare the lost pay.

The lack of support for a strike was one reason the SEIU team agreed to the deal this week, Stewart said.

"We've been listening to the workers, and what we heard was, there was a lot of workers who weren't going to be supportive of a strike," Stewart told the members.

Many workers said they were frustrated with the lack of participation by union members. The SEIU held a series of rallies to pressure the county to offer more pay, and none drew more than a couple of hundred people, out of nearly 4,000 members.

Ballots on the tentative contract agreement will be mailed Monday to SEIU members, who will have 10 days to vote.

John Nicoll, the county's chief deputy executive officer and its lead labor negotiator, said the county is happy with the proposed contract. "I think it's good for all of us, and it's a balanced agreement," he said.

Nicoll now must start negotiating with a new union that represents 134 county engineers and appraisers. They voted last month to break off from the SEIU and negotiate for their own labor agreements. Those talks are set to begin soon, Nicoll said.

Discussions

Posted by stephanie.ramirez on July 26, 2007 at 9:35 a.m. (Suggest removal)

I AM A MEMBER OF SEIU 998, I'M PERSONALLY GLAD WE DON'T HAVE TO GO ON STRIKE! I'M ALSO GLAD WE FINALLY CAME TO AN AGREEMENT!

Posted by greek1967 on July 26, 2007 at 10:52 a.m. (Suggest removal)

I am also relieved that we have an agreement thanks to the SEIU negotiation team for all of their efforts and hard work. Our membership needs to realize that we can have an impact on negotiations if we chose. A small sacrifice of personal time is well worth the end result of a great contract!

Posted by 805grl on July 26, 2007 at 12:39 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Im part of SEIU also. Im glad there is no strike I cannot afford it. I think this deal is better then what we were getting ...I think we should take it!

Posted by Tom_Johnston on July 26, 2007 at 6:41 p.m. (Suggest removal)

I am also an SEIU member in the County's employ.

On the whole this is a decent contract. There is money in most places that matter, wages, health benefits, retirement and a few others. Of course everyone would want more, but this is still a good contract. Kudos to the Team!

Whole classes of member will enjoy some sort of holiday benefit when they never did before.

By contrast though, members should look at the deal that was negotiated between Catholic Healthcare West/St. John's and the SEIU members of UHW (United Health Workers). Now THAT is a deal!

Same SEIU, but the UHW members seem to be more tuned in and on fire to take on the issues and back up their negotiators. An important difference I hope the Ventura County members of 721 (formerly 998) take to heart over the next 2+ years.

Posted by BillyBob on July 28, 2007 at 8:48 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Employee says "I'm leaning toward voting against it,I think we can do better." Then states that she is not willing to strike. If you aren't willing to strike, there is no "we".

This seems like a fair offer, and based on the small sampling of SEIU members here it looks like it will pass.

Posted by ebrockway on July 30, 2007 at 4:19 p.m. (Suggest removal)

It doesn't keep up with housing costs but it will stave off having to leave the area for a while at least. 15 years with the County is hard to leave, but keeping a roof over our heads was getting harder.



Discuss this article
(Requires free registration.)

Article discussions on this site are to support community debates of issues related to our stories and editorials.

Discussions should not stray from the subject of the story or editorial.

We do not allow the following:

  • Posts that degrade others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation or disability.
  • Disparaging remarks, abusive language or obscene comments.
  • Threats, whether obvious or veiled.

We reserve the right to delete threads and/or ban users for these or other reasons we deem necessary.

Opinions are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Username:

Password:
(Forgotten your password?)

Your Turn:

Loading videos... If you don't see them shortly, you may need to download the Flash Player.