Home › Opinion › Opinion
Editorial: Turn the tap for water use
Cheaper and safer for all
STORY TOOLS
More from Opinion
Bottled water has become as ubiquitous as cell phones, as fashionable as a Fendi handbag and as much of a guzzler of oil, 1.5 million barrels yearly, as it takes to refine enough gasoline to power 100,000 cars for a year.
Americans are the biggest consumers of bottled water, 37 billion bottles' worth in 2005, according to Food & Water Watch, an environmental group based in Washington, D.C. Growth has been steady and rapid — 6.4 billion gallons of bottled water in 2004, 7.2 billion gallons in 2005 and 8.3 billion gallons in 2006. The latter figure works out to 26 gallons for every man, woman and child in the states.
What drives this near obsession?
The International Bottled Water Association, in its frequently asked questions section of its Web site, says, "Bottled water is a great beverage choice for hydration and refreshment because of its consistent safety, quality, good taste and convenience."
Food & Water Watch disagrees. In its June report, "Take Back the Tap," the environmental group argues that tap water is just as safe and as clean. It has launched a campaign urging people to return to the tap for two main reasons: environmental effects and cost concerns.
Besides the 1.5 million barrels of oil used, worldwide bottling of water uses about 2.7 million tons of plastic a year. The group cites a 2006 Earth Policy Institute that the bottled-water industry in Britain dumps 30,000 tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere annually. Though the International Bottled Water Association claims water bottles are among the most recycled of all packaging, the Earth Policy Institute says 86 percent of empty plastic bottles end up in the garbage. In addition, shipping bottled water to retail outlets adds to pollution caused by fossil-fuel engines.
In the face of global climate change, cutting back on the use of bottled water would seem to be a no-brainer. But Americans have a love-hate relationship with tap water. A 2003 Gallup survey commissioned by the Environmental Protection Agency found that 33 percent of respondents drank bottled water for health and safety concerns. Another study by the Natural Resources Defense Council found 47 percent of respondents cite health and safety problems with tap water as a reason to drink bottled water.
Is tap water safe?
The EPA requires that water systems serving more than 1 million residents must test 300 water samples per month. For utilities that serve 3 million people or more, 480 samples monthly are required.
But tap water could be made even safer with full enforcement of the Clean Water Act, Food and & Watch says. And there must be an investment in maintenance and renewal of municipal water and sewage treatment plants, storage and distribution. Most primary water pipes and sewers beneath city streets date back to the years following World War II, the 1920s or the late 1800s.
A 2007 bill in Congress would provide $14 billion in federal loan guarantees over four years to cover improvements in water and sewer systems. But that comes to be a drop in the bucket. Food & Water Watch says communities are $22 billion short annually of needed funding. And, the EPA, Government Accountability Office and the nonprofit Water Infrastructure Network estimate $300 billion to $500 billion would be needed over 20 years to improve water and sewer infrastructure.
Congress should create a clean water trust fund to help communities improve infrastructure. The EPA needs to increase funding for oversight of drinking water and should fully enforce the Clean Water Act.
Consumers and pocketbooks
Still not convinced? How about looking at the cost of tap water versus bottled water?
Say you drink eight, 8-ounce glasses of water a day, one of those recommendations people follow but may not be necessary. In a year, you would guzzle 182.5 gallons of water. Food & Water Watch estimates that the cost of bottled water runs from 89 cents to $8.26 a gallon. You would be paying anywhere from $162.43 to $1,507.45 a year to quench your thirst. By contrast, the "Take Back the Tap" report says, tap water averages 2 cents a gallon, which means those 182.5 gallons of water would cost you $3.65 a year.
Water is one of those necessities of life. Properly managed, it can be a lasting, renewable and inexpensive natural resource.
The choice is yours, bottled water or tap. Before you decide, take a week to try the tap and compare — taste, convenience and savings.




Posted by Tom_Johnston on July 18, 2007 at 5:33 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I don't drink tap water much. Its ok to brush teeth and cook with, but I don't like the taste of it here in Ventura. Out here on the East End, the water is very hard and just doesn't taste all that good. I'm not even remotely concerned with health or safety, I'm pretty sure the water is safe to use, just unpleasant.
On the other hand, I put in a reverse osmosis unit I bought at Costco and maintain it via on-line purchases with "Watts Premier" a company that specializes in water treatment options. Reverse osmosis is a purification system that many bottled water companies use to make their product, often using plain city tap water as the source. The water I get from this simple system tastes better to me and that is what I drink. I use a combination of reusable and disposable water bottles and refill them.
It's easy and cheap. Google "Watts Premier" if this option interests you. They also have ultra-violet light sterilization options if you have health concerns.
Posted by Tom on July 18, 2007 at 9:46 a.m. (Suggest removal)
If you are paying $1.50 per billing unit of water (or 748 gallons) then the cost is .002 cents not .02 cents. That is .37 cents a year for the tap water. However if you have an Reverse Osmosis system that you are filling your bottles from, then you need to multiply it by 3. An R/O system uses three gallons of water to make one gallon of R/O water. That's still only $1.11 a year. Pretty cheap.
(Requires free registration.)
Article discussions on this site are to support community debates of issues related to our stories and editorials.
Discussions should not stray from the subject of the story or editorial.
We do not allow the following:
We reserve the right to delete threads and/or ban users for these or other reasons we deem necessary.
Opinions are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.