Weather | Beachcam
Login | Contact Us | Staff | Site Map | Archives | Alerts | Electronic Edition | Subscribe to the paper

HomeNewsLocal News

Dogs and cats safe from knife


Download Podcast  Download this story as a podcast!

SACRAMENTO — The Legislature's customary agenda of healthcare, education, public safety and other human affairs was interrupted Wednesday by this year's issue that mattered most to the masses: the sex lives of dogs and cats.

The Capitol doors opened extra early, an overflow room was provided to accommodate spectators and extra security was on hand for an 8 a.m. committee hearing that would determine the fate of AB1684 — a bill supporters called the California Healthy Pets Act, and opponents labeled the Pet Extinction Act.

In the end, the bill was put on hold until next year. The bill's author, Assemblyman Lloyd Levine, D-Van Nuys, made the decision after it became apparent that members of the Senate Local Government Committee were prepared to vote it down.

The bill called for the mandatory spaying or neutering of all dogs and cats, with certain exceptions for breeders of purebreds, police dogs, guide dogs for people with disabilities and for everyday pet owners who simply wanted the family pet to produce just one litter before being sterilized.

The list of organizations supporting the bill ran 10 pages, from the Alpha Canine Society to Underdog Rescue. The list of opponents was nine pages long, from the Airedale Terrier Club of America to the Yorkshire Terrier Club of Los Angeles. Opponents also weighed in with petitions containing 10,000 signatures and enough faxes to break the committee chairwoman's fax machine.

In the two days leading to the hearing, the bill had brought TV celebrity Bob Barker to the Capitol to lobby on its behalf, followed by a protest appearance by a descendant of TV's Lassie and the actor who played Timmy, Jon Provost, the dog's faithful companion.

In the end, Lassie won the day.

William Hemby, lobbyist for a pet owners' group called PetPac, attributed the bill's defeat to a true grass-roots uprising the likes of which he's never seen in 30 years as a lobbyist.

"We put together thousands and thousands of pet owners," Hemby said. "It's never been done before in the history of the state."

He said they were motivated by the fear that such a law, if aggressively enforced, could have dried up the supply of puppies and kittens and ended pet ownership as it exists today.

"Our members were equating this to Prohibition," he said. "People just don't like to be told what to do with their dogs and cats."

Levine argued that, thanks to education and the proliferation of low-cost spay and neuter clinics, 70 percent of pets in California today are sterile.

He said only a mandate could reach the remaining 30 percent and thus relieve the financial and emotional burden of having to exterminate tens of thousands of unwanted cats and dogs each year.

Barker, who spoke at a Capitol news conference Monday to promote the bill, said a mandate will be needed if California is to end the suffering and slaughter.

"Our country, if it's to be civilized, must protect all living things," he said.

Discussions

Posted by andreacavanaugh on July 12, 2007 at 7:05 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Millions, not tens of thousands, of dogs and cats are killed every year - 450,000 each year in California alone. The owners of the 30 percent of unaltered pets are 100 percent of the problem.

This bill wasn't about creating a 'nanny state,' it was an extreme solution to an unbelievably cruel situation that wouldn't be necessary if people would take responsibility for their animals. Lassie may have 'won the day,' but millions of unwanted dogs and cats will continue to lose their lives. Please spay and neuter your pets!

Posted by LiChDom on July 12, 2007 at 10:46 a.m. (Suggest removal)

My only concern is government again deciding what is best for us. I personally do not know one person with a cat or dog that did not have their animals neutured. I think continuing education is important.

Also what happens if the dog or cat isn't neutured or the owner can't afford it? Will the animal be taken away and put in the pound? If the required neuturing is rolled into the license procedure, how many people will get their dogs and cats licensed? Will they have to go door to door to check to see if the household pets are neutured? This is an added burden on an already overburdened Animal Control Department.

All of my animals are from various shelters, which of course, require that they be neutured before you can pick them up and bring them home. Even dog parks usually require that male dogs be neutured before they're allowed in.

Again, education is important. But there will always be people who skirt the issue and will just not bother to have it done. They also probably don't take their animals to the vets. Law or not, it will not change that.

Posted by uknow1 on July 12, 2007 at 5:23 p.m. (Suggest removal)

my only concern are all of the domestic pets that will continued to be killed in this state, what a shame...

Posted by BeaHappi on July 12, 2007 at 5:49 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Andrea - well said and I totally agree with you. One only needs to visit a shelter one time to know that breeding is out of control. There are far too many unwanted pets and people discard them as if they are rubbish.

If people did the right thing then perhaps the government wouldn't have to decide what is best for us.

Posted by skycop57 on July 12, 2007 at 6:36 p.m. (Suggest removal)

you have to license your dogs and we do go door to door checking that they are licensed. The number of unlicensed dogs is amazing but worst is the number of unaltered dogs.



Discuss this article
(Requires free registration.)

Article discussions on this site are to support community debates of issues related to our stories and editorials.

Discussions should not stray from the subject of the story or editorial.

We do not allow the following:

  • Posts that degrade others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation or disability.
  • Disparaging remarks, abusive language or obscene comments.
  • Threats, whether obvious or veiled.

We reserve the right to delete threads and/or ban users for these or other reasons we deem necessary.

Opinions are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Username:

Password:
(Forgotten your password?)

Your Turn:

Loading videos... If you don't see them shortly, you may need to download the Flash Player.