Weather | Beachcam
Login | Contact Us | Staff | Site Map | Archives | Alerts | Electronic Edition | Subscribe to the paper

HomeOpinionOpinion Columnists

Larsen: The president in waiting

Time for Gore to stop talking and start running


Download Podcast  Download this story as a podcast!

Al Gore must step out of his role as influential statesman, realize duty calls and enter the 2008 race for the presidency.

Gore has shown in recent years how determination can make a difference. And his determination could find no better outlet than helping this nation regain its world leadership role, especially in the face of this aging planet's most insidious threat: destruction by humanity's ever-growing burden on the environment.

Gore knows the danger well. His focus on this planet's fragile environment and how global climate change has been affecting it has created the awareness needed to understand the problem.

Gore has not been the sole messenger of this threat, merely the most visible. Many scientists, including biologist E.O. Wilson, have long warned of the dangers faced. Wilson, interviewed Friday on "Bill Moyers' Journal," put the danger into precise terms.

"This is the only planet we're ever going to have," he said. He called the natural environment that has taken hundreds of millions of years to create, "our greatest natural heritage. And we're throwing it away in a matter of a few decades."

Gore has been bringing this message to the masses through his film, "An Inconvenient Truth," and in his sponsorship of the 24-hour "Live Earth" concert that spanned the globe over the weekend.

But it takes more than a film and a worldwide concert to bring about solutions — it takes leadership to marshal the best talents and the most creative thinkers, things many nations have in abundance, to move from problems identified to solutions found.

As Gore told the "Live Earth" audience Saturday in Giants Stadium in East Rutherford, N.J.: "Times like these demand action."

But the need has gone far beyond asking people to do their part in cleaning up the environment, in reducing their carbon footprints, in creating an Earth that will sustain future generations.

The problem has grown so large in scope, it requires action on a national scale. Only the full force of government can bring about the necessary mobilization of technology, talent and incentive to address the problem. It requires a mobilization akin to the way this nation roused itself from isolationist slumber after Pearl Harbor. It requires implementing goals akin to President Kennedy's calling for this nation to send a man to the moon and return him safely, a feat accomplished in less than eight years.

Gore has earned the right to issue the challenge. But this is not merely a national problem. All nations must work in conjunction with each other to save planet Earth.

The next president must be, above all else, a statesman whose vision extends well beyond this nation's border, one who understands how to work with and not browbeat foreign leaders and one who will seek a consensus with other nations and not demand they slavishly bend to this nation's will.

It cannot be said too often: Saving the environment has become the greatest task facing this world today.

Yes, other issues large and small will face whomever becomes president and the foreign leaders with whom he or she will interact. External threats exist that require strong security measures. Poverty and hunger continue to be twin plagues in a world of plenty. The war in Iraq has destabilized much of the Middle East. And no one can predict what might happen — good or bad.

Yet, by failing to focus a lion's share of attention and efforts on restoring and protecting the environment, people run the risk of something far worse than a terrorist attack, an impoverished nation, upheaval in the Middle East — they run the risk of losing all life.

Yes, money, lots of it, will need to be spent to repair man's damage to this planet. But it does bring a return.

Species that thrive in an ecosystem provide services to humanity such as pollination and water purification. Wilson told Moyers on Friday the true value of these services:

"We get from nature scot-free, so long as we don't screw it up and destroy it, approximately the same amount of services, as far as you can measure them in dollars, we ourselves produce each year. It was about $30 trillion a year."

By damaging the ecosystem, Wilson said, humanity brings about the conditions that destroy valuable species, weakening an ecosystem and making it less likely to rebound after a disaster.

Humanity has been damaging the ecosystem and placed itself in a life-and-death struggle. Action must begin now.

On stage Saturday in New Jersey, Gore asked audience members to commit themselves to a seven-point pledge that includes urging a moratorium on new coal-powered plants and an increased effort to find more renewable energy.

"I would like to ask each and every one of you to answer the call," he said.

Gore has issued his call. Will he heed the nation's call?

— Richard Larsen is a deputy opinion page editor at The Star. His e-mail address is rlarsen@VenturaCountyStar.com.

Discussions

Posted by WH on July 10, 2007 at 9:03 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Al Gore Just demonstrated what a LIAR he is once again. This last weekend he claimed two billion watched Live Earth and he still stands by those numbers.

Well, TV rating systems tell us that 4 million watched in the US on NBC, The BBC claimed 3.1 Million in the UK, MSN said 10 million watched on the internet, and less than 500,000 actually attended the concerts.

That adds up to less than 1% of the supposed worldwide audience.

So where, in the rest of the world, were the other 1,982,500,000 participants that Al Gore still says attended??

Al Gore is lying through his teeth again, taking you all for idiots, and hyping his GW scam for profit (he owns a Carbon Offset trading company).

And you want this charlatan as Ptresident????

Posted by Franbill on July 10, 2007 at 9:21 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Al Gore is like your common cold. He comes, he runs his course and goes away without any lasting side effects. No need to treat this slight problem with harshness or kindness. He pops up every so often, knocks on our psyche, demands us to go 'green' (a sublime idea if you ask me) and takes his leave. The man has declared he has fallen out of love with politics, so let us respect his wishes. Besides, he has a huge challenge as it is with a recalcitrant, pill-popping, freeway-swerving, mug shot-photogenic Junior.

Posted by allblacks on July 10, 2007 at 4:12 p.m. (Suggest removal)

ken1000, the article is about Gore, not Bush. You have probably had more than one chance to complain about Bush. Stick to the topic. Defend Gore if you want, but don't default to the typical Bush lied bit.

Posted by mikeb6804 on July 10, 2007 at 8:12 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Al Gore is a first class snake oil salesman and ultra liberal Richard Larsen will never figure it out. What will make me the happiest is the sight of Mr. Larsen and his yellow VW bug with daisies painted all over (I'm sure he has one!) disappearing over the hill for the last time.

Posted by Franbill on July 10, 2007 at 9 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Richard Larsen is one of a few brave and passionate writers in a difficult era. He is, actually, quite delightfully readable. He lends some gravitas and smarts to my Tuesday Star.

So no, the minute he goes, out goes the multitude of us who hanker for responsible and thought-eliciting journalism.

I may not approve of his president-in-waiting, Al Gore, but that's my personal opinion. Larsen has my ear and my attention. He has the moxie and aggressive determination to make the paper responsible, balanced and interesting.

Yes - I'd like to keep my "Tuesdays with Larsen" the way it is, thank you very much.

Posted by brewski on July 11, 2007 at 4:53 p.m. (Suggest removal)

I agree with Richard Larson's characterization of Al Gore, his accomplishments and the challenges that lay ahead for him and for our country. There is simply no one more qualified to lead our country.

I would also like to correct "WH" who states that Al Gore owns a carbon offset trading company. In fact he doesn't. His company is called Generation Investment Management LLP and is based in London. The company gives investment advice, but does not own any stock of the companies it recommends. By repeating this myth "WH" shows that his comments are emotional and not informed.



Discuss this article
(Requires free registration.)

Article discussions on this site are to support community debates of issues related to our stories and editorials.

Discussions should not stray from the subject of the story or editorial.

We do not allow the following:

  • Posts that degrade others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation or disability.
  • Disparaging remarks, abusive language or obscene comments.
  • Threats, whether obvious or veiled.

We reserve the right to delete threads and/or ban users for these or other reasons we deem necessary.

Opinions are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Username:

Password:
(Forgotten your password?)

Your Turn:

Loading videos... If you don't see them shortly, you may need to download the Flash Player.