Home › News › Conejo Valley
Foy heads state group that seeks less government
Healthcare reform is a target for new chapter
As politicians in Sacramento worked Monday to hammer out a healthcare plan, a group of anti-big government activists vowed to do everything they could to stop it.
"I don't like what is coming out of Sacramento," said Ventura County Supervisor Peter Foy. "Do I know what is good for me, or the government?"
At a news conference near Los Robles Hospital & Medical Center, Foy announced he is the state chairman for the new California chapter of Americans for Prosperity, a nonprofit group that advocates for free markets and less government.
The healthcare reform plan approved by the Assembly on Monday, which would assess employers anywhere from 1 percent to 6.5 percent of payroll to cover uninsured workers, is a prime target for the group that has chapters in 20 other states.
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and Assembly Speaker Fabian Nuñez, D-Los Angeles, have said the plan will insure as much as 70 percent of uninsured Californians while helping to pump billions into the state's healthcare system.
But opponents at Monday's rally found the cost of the $14.4 billion plan staggering as the state is already grappling with a projected $14 billion deficit.
"We want to know where that money is going to come from," said David Spady, state director for the group.
"It's irresponsible to debate a proposal with that price tag."
In Sacramento, Assemblywoman Patty Berg, D-Eureka, said the funding for the healthcare package is designed to stand separate from the state budget.
"Our new healthcare system will stand on its own two feet," she said.
Spady and Foy said if there were less government interference and more companies competing with each other, the price of healthcare would drop. More government is not the answer, they said.
A spokeswoman for the group, which also fights other big-government issues in other states, said health insurance should be more like car insurance — covering catastrophic events but leaving it up to the individual to pay for general maintenance.
Foy said the group, which has a $500,000 budget in California, will start to take on other issues around the state in the future.
If the healthcare initiative makes it through the Senate, it will still have to be voted on in a referendum.
Though Monday's news conference was planned and the media was invited, the group did not ask the hospital if it could hold the event there. Minutes before it was scheduled to start, hospital officials politely asked members to hold the meeting on a nearby public sidewalk.
Tom Lucas, who owns Performance Nursery in Moorpark, was one of the roughly 15 people who showed up to watch the announcement.
He said if the initiative passes, he could pay an additional $150,000 in taxes and said he supports what the group is doing to fight the proposal.
"We can't support the state in a runaway situation," he said.
— The Associated Press contributed to this report.




Posted by KatieTeague on December 18, 2007 at 7:40 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I'm confused. Shouldn't this be the work of our assembly or senate representative?
Posted by shaver_one on December 18, 2007 at 10:16 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Foy is a 'Free Market' Neocon. Who'd a thunk it?
I'm glad that Sacramento is talking about health care. But, I have to vote no on this plan. Their funding scheme is way out of whack.
Raise the tax on a specifically targeted group of people, in this case tobacco users, to fund the entire program. What happens to the funding should a significant number of Californians decide to quit smoking? A $14.4 billion albatross with no money.
Are you prepared to spend nine dollars for your Starbucks. How about three dollars for your 99-cent iPod download?
If Sacramento wouold simply take the profit-motive out of health care, every Californian would be able to afford to purchase (I said purchase) adequate insurance.
But, remember: JUST BECAUSE YOU HAVE HEALTH INSURANCE DOES NOT MEAN YOU HAVE HEALTH COVERAGE.
shaverone.blog.com
tagword: Healthcaree
Posted by Poppa on December 18, 2007 at 2:16 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Peter Foy is a health insurance broker. Most of these brokers make their money by getting kick backs from the companies they set their clients up with. For example, Kaiser tends to kick back 1% of the total cost to the broker, Healthnet does the same thing. They also have very cozy relationships with the insurers like Blue Cross. Don't believe me? Call Health Net and ask them if they make direct payments to health insurance brokers. Most of these brokers make more money as the cost of your health insurance increases. It looks like Foy is trying to protect his wallet at the expense of Californians who do not have healthcare.
Posted by BillyBob on December 19, 2007 at 11:38 p.m. (Suggest removal)
How about less Foy in Government!!!
(Requires free registration.)
Article discussions on this site are to support community debates of issues related to our stories and editorials.
Discussions should not stray from the subject of the story or editorial.
We do not allow the following:
We reserve the right to delete threads and/or ban users for these or other reasons we deem necessary.
Opinions are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.