Home › Elections › Elections Opinion
Final debates told us little about the candidates
Iowans, they're all yours
ELECTIONS '08

Check out our one stop for all the information and news you need to be ready for to cast your vote.
Election Central »
Elections stories » Star endorsements »
STORY TOOLS
More from Elections Opinion
Pity the poor folks in Iowa. After the final debates, first among the Republican presidential candidates and then the Democratic contenders, before Iowans vote, the undecideds must be tempted to choose "None of the above."
Fair or not, the Iowa caucuses on the night of Jan. 3 will whisk out of the picture some of the candidates who have been running nonstop for a year. Two Democrats and two Republicans will leave Iowa for the New Hampshire primary boosted by the results, even if their triumph ultimately proves to be a last hurrah as voters in other states weigh in.
The last two debates, hosted by the Des Moines Register and Iowa Public Television, were painfully dreary, omitting questions about the war in Iraq, foreign policy and immigration. They elicited sound bites, prompting the weary candidates to utter the bland, do-no-harm platitudes that campaign rallies encourage.
There was almost no give-and-take among the candidates and no follow-up. The debates were held during the day, when most people are not at home. Less than a month before Iowans go to their caucus meetings, we learned nothing new.
Republicans would push for more tax cuts, paid for by unspecified spending cuts, and, with a few exceptions, such as Ron Paul of Texas, follow President Bush's policy on Iraq.
Democrats would raise taxes on corporations and the wealthy, get out of Iraq, make American foreign policy credible and spend more on healthcare and education.
The rest of us may be jealous that Iowans get to have the first vote — or contemptuous that such a serious decision that impacts us all starts in the county fairs of a small state. But as the long, long courtship of the Hawkeye State by the candidates comes to an end, we have gratitude to Iowans, who have lived with this process so the rest of us could go on about our own lives.
All the candidates have expressed their thanks to the people of Iowa for letting them into their living rooms, for shaking their hands and going to their rallies and, as Sen. Joseph Biden, D-Del., said, for taking the process seriously and treating all the candidates with respect.
It has been tempting to criticize the contenders, all of whom have put their egos on display, inviting us to probe their lives, decisions, choices, family life, foibles and mistakes. But at the same time, we have to be grateful to them all for caring deeply about this country.
Everybody in America seems to want change. We haven't learned yet how the candidates specifically would deliver change in pragmatic, workable ways. But Iowans pushed and prodded as much as they could to try to force the candidates to tell us. As Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., said, Iowans did the best they could to take the candidates out for test drives.
Asked about their New Year's resolutions, the Democrats, again, were egregiously predictable. Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, of New York, would exercise more and spend more time with her family and rebuild the confidence and optimism of Americans. Former Sen. John Edwards, of North Carolina, would remember that every night a child goes to bed hungry, a family goes to the emergency room and a father loses his job.
Sen. Chris Dodd, of Connecticut, wants optimism and that Iowans vote for him. New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson vows to lose weight and stay positive. Biden vows to remember that life can change in a second and treat his family well. Obama resolves to be a better father and husband and not be timid.
Republicans were asked for their resolutions for each other. Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee urged them to be more careful in what they say. Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney said they should all have a spirited campaign and then elect a Republican. One-time Sen. Fred Thompson of Tennessee resolved to be a better man, husband and father. Rep. Tom Tancredo of Colorado wondered how Huckabee is going to convince Americans he's the one.
Ron Paul urged everyone to obey the Constitution and guard civil liberties. Rep. Duncan Hunter of California urged everyone to buy American goods. Rudolph Giuliani, the former mayor of New York, urged everyone to realize they are lucky to be Americans. Sen. John McCain of Arizona urged everyone to raise the level of dialogue and civility.
With America in holiday mode, we leave Iowans to ponder their choices. As we do every four years, we salute, as Obama said, their core decency and generosity of spirit.
And we wish them wisdom Jan. 3, despite the tedium of the debates.
— Ann McFeatters has covered the White House and national politics since 1986. E-mail her at amcfeatters@nationalpress.com.




Posted by mikeb6804 on December 17, 2007 at 6:39 a.m. (Suggest removal)
The debates were non-events attended by a flock of non-candidates --- both parties.
Posted by cassandra on December 17, 2007 at 10:09 a.m. (Suggest removal)
A look at the best of the bunch--http://www.smirkingchimp.com/n...
Posted by cassandra on December 17, 2007 at 10:26 a.m. (Suggest removal)
oops.I'll try again for a hot link.
http://www.smirkingchimp.com/node/11602
Posted by GuideDog on December 17, 2007 at 10:29 a.m. (Suggest removal)
The philosophy of most of the leading candidates has been "better safe than sorry" so they do not venture out too far from the pack on their positions or they avoid details or even discussion of "third rail" of topics like the current health care disaster. Heard much about national security planning for disasters like Katrina or the next huge earthquake to hit California? What real detailed discussion has there been on the looming disaster in medicare and social security that national demographics is only beginning to cause? What real solutions have been put forward regarding the outsourcing of America - manufacturing and services?
Answer: Next to nothing!
Is anybody there? Does anybody care?
Posted by cassandra on December 17, 2007 at 10:45 a.m. (Suggest removal)
more along the same lines from the top NYTimes Columnist:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/17/opi...
Posted by del on December 17, 2007 at 12:51 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"Iowans, they're all yours"
Yeah, you folks keep 'em. We need to find some replacements with a backbone and no corporate ties.
Posted by sslocal on December 17, 2007 at 2:38 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Good luck with that one del. Anymore it seems they all have ties to the corparate world.
(Requires free registration.)
Article discussions on this site are to support community debates of issues related to our stories and editorials.
Discussions should not stray from the subject of the story or editorial.
We do not allow the following:
We reserve the right to delete threads and/or ban users for these or other reasons we deem necessary.
Opinions are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.