Weather | Beachcam
Login | Contact Us | Staff | Site Map | Archives | Alerts | Electronic Edition | Subscribe to the paper

HomeNewsOther News

County steps in to pay for T.O. foster home


Download Podcast  Download this story as a podcast!

The County of Ventura will pay to keep a foster home in Thousand Oaks open until November, in the hopes that a new nonprofit will step forward to run it.

Interface Children Family Services has run the program for the past 10 years, relying on state funding and private fundraising. It's an apartment building where as many as eight teenagers live semi-independently as they prepare for their 18th birthday and their release from the foster care system.

Earlier this month, Interface told the county it would shut the program down on Sept. 15, because it couldn't afford to keep it running. The state pays Interface $3,863 per month for each child in the program, and Interface says its actual costs are much higher.

On Friday, the County Board of Supervisors voted 4-1 to pay Interface up to $15,452 to keep the home open for an additional two months.

That will give Interface time to look for another nonprofit to take over, or, if one can't be found, to look for foster homes for the four teenagers who live there now.

Erik Sternad, Interface's executive director, said two nonprofits have expressed interest in running the program.

With some changes, it would be possible to run the program on the money the state provides, Sternad said. For example, if seven children lived there instead of only four, it would probably break even.

It's hard to keep the program full, because not every foster child is right for it, he said. They must be able to live on their own, hold down a job, and stay in school and out of trouble.

Supervisor Peter Foy was the lone "no" vote. He said he was worried the program could become an open-ended obligation for the county, and he also didn't want to set a precedent that could encourage other nonprofits to ask the county for money.

"I'm not saying we shouldn't care for these kids, but are there other ways that they can be taken care of, programs that work better, financially?" Foy said.

The rest of the board said the urgency of the children's situation outweighed the financial concerns.

"These are our kids — we are literally, economically, financially, morally, ethically the parents of these kids," Supervisor Steve Bennett said. "If the state cut every dollar for foster kids, we'd have no choice but to fund it ourselves. ... That's frustrating, but it's the reality of this job."

Discussions
Discuss this article
(Requires free registration.)

Article discussions on this site are to support community debates of issues related to our stories and editorials.

Discussions should not stray from the subject of the story or editorial.

We do not allow the following:

  • Posts that degrade others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation or disability.
  • Disparaging remarks, abusive language or obscene comments.
  • Threats, whether obvious or veiled.

We reserve the right to delete threads and/or ban users for these or other reasons we deem necessary.

Opinions are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Username:

Password:
(Forgotten your password?)

Your Turn:

Loading videos... If you don't see them shortly, you may need to download the Flash Player.