Weather | Beachcam
Login | Contact Us | Staff | Site Map | Archives | Alerts | Electronic Edition | Subscribe to the paper

HomeOpinionOpinion Columnists

Moraga: Born in East L.A., really

Deportation miscue almost turns to tragedy


Download Podcast  Download this story as a podcast!

In the 1980s comedy "Born in East L.A.," Cheech Marin is asked who is the president of the United States? He responds, "That cowboy guy, the guy from Death Valley Days,' John Wayne." The Duke versus the Gipper — Ronald Reagan. Easy mistake.

So Marin's character is deported to Mexico, even though he was born in East L.A. and speaks little Spanish.

The comedy then follows his antics as he tries unsuccessfully to sneak back into the U.S.

Just a comedy. Not real life. That would never happen in today's cyberconnected society where everybody's personal data are available to federal and law-enforcement officials at the click of a computer mouse.

Well, the family of Pedro Guzman have a different story to tell you.

Like Marin's character, Guzman was also born in East L.A. But unlike Marin's character, Guzman's family says Pedro is developmentally disabled.

Guzman's troubles began when he was arrested for vandalism and trespassing in Lancaster. While in custody at the Los Angeles County jail, officials, apparently, failed to check on his background and any prior arrests. For some bizarre reason, those officials decided he was an undocumented immigrant and not a U.S. citizen.

After serving about 20 days in jail, he was transferred to an immigration center in Santa Ana where he, apparently, signed a document stating he was a Mexican citizen, according to a story in the L.A. Weekly.

Shortly thereafter, Guzman was shipped off to Tijuana, a Mexican city he had only visited once as a teenager. He arrived there May 11, managed to call his family to tell them where he was, but then the line went dead and for the next three months he appeared to have dropped off the face of this Earth.

During this time, his mother, Maria Carbajal of Lancaster traveled to Tijuana and elsewhere in Baja California to conduct her own search for her son.

For his part, Guzman tried unsuccessfully to re-enter the U.S., being turned away at the border because he didn't have the proper paperwork. He was eventually told by one border guard to "stop playing games."

During the next few months, Guzman lived on the streets, ate out of trash cans and bathed in rivers while his family continued their search on weekends. The American Civil Liberties Union became involved and filed a complaint asking the Department of Homeland Security to get involved and conduct its own search for Guzman.

That complaint was denied by a U.S. District judge.

So the family search went on until this past Sunday, when Guzman was finally stopped and held after trying to cross the border into Calexico from Mexicali, about 100 miles east of Tijuana.

At that point, officials finally figured out he was a U.S. citizen and, of all things, held him on a probation violation for missing a hearing in July — at the same time he was trying to get back to the U.S.

Guzman was taken to the Los Angeles County jail, transferred to the Lancaster and then ordered by a judge to be released to his family Tuesday.

It took 89 days before this man without a country was finally allowed home.

Family members said they have been unable to communicate with him because he is still in a state of shock, stuttering and fearful.

"He left complete, but they took half of my son," Carbajal said at the press conference held this week. "That is the government's fault. They are guilty."

ACLU attorneys vowed to continue their case against the government for unlawful deportation and violation of civil rights.

Mark Rosenbaum, the ACLU's legal director, was livid at the press conference at the organization's headquarters in Los Angeles, calling the action by the federal government nothing short of racial profiling.

"This government deported Pedro Guzman because of his skin color, did not examine or review his documents stating that he was born in California because of his skin color, did not bother to comfort this family when he was found because of his skin color," Rosenbaum was quoted in the L.A. Weekly.

Guzman's case raises troubling questions.

Are the rights of certain U.S. citizens to due process threatened in all the frenzy by some to stop illegal immigration at any cost?

Shouldn't the U.S. government take a more proactive role in finding its own citizens in foreign countries after they have been illegally deported?

Who will be the next Pedro Guzman?

Protecting our borders from a foreign threat like al-Qaida is one thing. Preventing American citizens from re-entering their home country is an entirely different matter.

Unlike the movie "Born in East L.A.," this was not an entertaining comedy, just a comedy of errors.

— Frank Moraga is The Star's director of diversity and general manager of Mi Estrella, The Star's bilingual weekly newspaper. He can be reached at fmoraga@VenturaCountyStar.com.

Discussions

Posted by msavalla on August 10, 2007 at 10:51 a.m. (Suggest removal)

It is truly sad that this citizen was inadvertantly deported. How many times has this happened? Not many I bet. Where do you get that the government "prevented American Citizens from reentering their home." Maybe we should tatoo all citizens so we would know who belongs and who doesn't. Maybe a National ID card would help. But then someone would leave it at home and still be deported. What a terrible imperfect world we live in.

Posted by nannyfo1 on August 10, 2007 at 2:33 p.m. (Suggest removal)

So here are a couple of lessons learned.

First, don't vandalize or trespass. This will keep you out of the hands of the police.

Second, don't sign anything stating you are not a citizen if you are.

Third, if you have a family member incapable of the first two lessons, don't let him or her out of your sight.

Why is the family not taking FULL responsibility for what happened? Either Pedro has the capacity to be responsible for his actions or he doesn't. If he lacks the capacity to understand what he is signing or that it is against the law to vandalize, why wasn't the family keeping an eye on him?

This article was written to fit this liberal template- Everyone is a victim and it is the governments fault.

Posted by Freedom1 on August 11, 2007 at 5:48 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Couldn't agree with you more "nannyfo1." Same questions I had. If Mr. Moraga was truly an unbiased journalist, he would have asked these same quesions before he wrote his editorial. But we all know that he's not, so his editorial and his conclusions were expected.



Discuss this article
(Requires free registration.)

Article discussions on this site are to support community debates of issues related to our stories and editorials.

Discussions should not stray from the subject of the story or editorial.

We do not allow the following:

  • Posts that degrade others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation or disability.
  • Disparaging remarks, abusive language or obscene comments.
  • Threats, whether obvious or veiled.

We reserve the right to delete threads and/or ban users for these or other reasons we deem necessary.

Opinions are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Username:

Password:
(Forgotten your password?)

Your Turn:

Loading videos... If you don't see them shortly, you may need to download the Flash Player.