Home › News › Local News
Group will seek to limit building heights
Meeting set tonight in Ventura to discuss planned initiative
A group of Ventura residents, fearful that structures taller than two stories would ruin views of the hillsides, has created a political action committee and plans to ask voters to establish maximum building heights.
Members of Ventura Citizens Organized for Responsible Development, or VCORD, say city leaders have repeatedly ignored their concerns. The group says too many tall buildings threaten to dull Ventura's character.
The group will hold a town-hall meeting tonight to introduce its initiative, the first step in what is likely to be a monthslong effort to qualify a measure for the ballot. The 7 p.m. meeting will be at the Unitarian Universalist Church, 5654 Ralston St.
"We are in danger of losing our sense of place," said co-founder Camille Harris, a midtown resident spurred to action when a three-story complex was approved in her neighborhood of mostly single-story bungalows.
The group's goal is to form a "view resources" committee and limit building heights citywide to 26 feet, except in the downtown, most of the Victoria Avenue corridor, around the city's two hospitals, and in areas designated for heavy commercial or manufacturing use, Harris said.
"We exempted every part of town where we could imagine (creation of) a decent job," she said.
Opponents, however, say such an initiative would be drastic and unnecessary.
City planners are drafting zoning rules that would reduce building height limits from six stories to three along most of Thompson Boulevard and East Main Street. Portions of Thompson near Sanjon Road would be limited to two stories, said Kaiser Ringwala, assistant director of community development.
Those standards could go to the City Council for adoption in the fall.
Ventura Mayor Carl Morehouse said three stories is appropriate along Thompson and Main and higher in the Five Points area to revitalize the corridors. Ballot measures have blocked development of farmland and hillsides, he said, and the city's 20-year growth blueprint identifies Main and Thompson for intensified development.
VCORD plans to collect feedback tonight and submit a formal initiative to the City Clerk's Office next week. City Attorney Bob Boehm would have two weeks to certify it. The group then would have to publish it in a local newspaper and collect signatures of 7,000 registered voters, or 10 percent of the city's roughly 70,000 voters. The deadline to make the November ballot would be May 18, according to the City Clerk's Office.
A special election would require signatures of 15 percent of registered voters, or 10,500.




Posted by Equitable_Enforcer on April 19, 2007 at 8:28 a.m. (Suggest removal)
VCORD has the right approach. From the Planning Commission to the City Council and even the City Manager, self interest does come before the welfare of our citizens. "They" know what is good for us. Citizens from three mature neighborhoods around the Citrus Walk project which is on Henderson Rd. just off of Kimball, worked with The Olson Co. for some three years to ensure that the project blended with the surrounding community and that interests of the home owners were protected.
After having made it through Planning and the City Council --- Mr. Cole comes on board and, along with his rural planning czarina, Anne Dagle (since resigned, reportedly to "help" Louisiana recover from Katrina), torpedoes most of the agreement. Back to the drawing board. I won't go into details here, but an example of his arrogance is where the neighborhood was against any alleys in the new project because of the potential for criminal activity. Cole pushed for and got his alleys.
I should mention --- many those on the perimeter of the project lost their view of the mountains. Within nothing but single family homes on three sides and the 126 on the other, we now have condos in the middle.
Moreover, the VCORD course is designed to facilitate the type of community harmony that would contribute to an overall reduction in crime --- while attracting the right types of industry.
(Requires free registration.)
Article discussions on this site are to support community debates of issues related to our stories and editorials.
Discussions should not stray from the subject of the story or editorial.
We do not allow the following:
We reserve the right to delete threads and/or ban users for these or other reasons we deem necessary.
Opinions are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.