Weather | Beachcam
Login | Contact Us | Staff | Site Map | Archives | Alerts | Electronic Edition | Subscribe to the paper

HomeNewsOther News

City Council may oppose proposed LNG terminal

The Oxnard City Council wants staff members to draft a resolution opposing a proposed liquefied natural gas terminal that could be located offshore from Ventura County.

The council members told the staff on Tuesday to draft the resolution so they could review it and decide whether to go on record opposing the offshore facility. If it passes, Councilman John Zaragoza said Wednesday, he would like the resolution to go to federal and state regulatory agencies and to Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger.

The governor could have the final say on the proposed LNG terminal.

Officials said the law gives the U.S. secretary of transportation the authority to license an offshore facility such as an LNG terminal. They also said the secretary of transportation may not issue a license without the OK of the governor.

The council expects to receive a draft resolution at its July 13 meeting.

Two liquefied natural gas deep-water port facilities are being proposed. Potential sites include off Oxnard, Malibu, Ventura and Santa Barbara shores.

Recently, Malibu adopted a resolution opposed to an offshore LNG terminal, citing environmental and health issues.

Critics also say the LNG process is too dangerous, fraught with the potential for catastrophic consequences in the event of a spill, which could emit a large, extremely flammable vapor cloud.

The company says the proposed facility would deliver more than 200 billion cubic feet of natural gas annually to California, enough to provide 25 percent of the state's residential energy needs. Officials estimated it could save Southern California $54 billion a year through lower natural gas prices.

Company representatives say liquefied natural gas has an impeccable safety record, adding that vessels carrying gas have made more than 21,000 voyages around the world without any major incidents. There are liquefied natural gas plants in Massachusetts, Maryland, Georgia and Louisiana.

Discussions
Discuss this article
(Requires free registration.)

Article discussions on this site are to support community debates of issues related to our stories and editorials.

Discussions should not stray from the subject of the story or editorial.

We do not allow the following:

  • Posts that degrade others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation or disability.
  • Disparaging remarks, abusive language or obscene comments.
  • Threats, whether obvious or veiled.

We reserve the right to delete threads and/or ban users for these or other reasons we deem necessary.

Opinions are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Username:

Password:
(Forgotten your password?)

Your Turn:

Loading videos... If you don't see them shortly, you may need to download the Flash Player.